Preventing violations of mandatory requirements: New qualities of preventive visit

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.304

Abstract

One of the guidelines for the reform of the sphere of state control in Russia has become the priority of preventing violations of mandatory requirements in relation to the conduct of control activities. At the same time, the types of preventive measures in terms of content and
consequences for controlled persons differ significantly, and the legislator linked the implementation of prevention with the organization and implementation of control measures. In this regard, a preventive visit stands out, which has become a popular tool for preventing
violations of mandatory requirements. The result of changes in legislation on state control,
including the establishment of features of the organization and implementation of prevention,
was a qualitative transformation of the preventive visit. At the moment, there is a tendency to replace control measures with a preventive visit, which makes it possible to use the potential for preventing violations of mandatory requirements not only as measures preceding control measures, but also as measures replacing such measures, including on the initiative of controlled persons. The indicated approach made it possible to reduce the administrative burden on controlled persons and create conditions for the effective distribution of resources of state control bodies. At the same time, the convergence of the qualitative characteristics of
a preventive visit with state control measures requires a revision of the system of guarantees for the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of controlled persons, so that within the framework of preventive measures that are carried out instead of control measures, the standard of protection of the rights of controlled persons is not reduced.

Keywords:

control, supervision, control activities, administrative reform, state control, balance interests, constitutional principles, prevention, preventive visit

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Бахрах, Демьян Н. 1972. «Административное принуждение в СССР, его виды и основные тенденции развития». Автореф. дис. … д-ра юрид. наук, Всесоюзный научно-исследовательский институт советского законодательства.

Бахрах, Демьян Н. 2000. Административное право России. М.: Норма; Инфра-М.

Дмитрикова, Екатерина А., Альберт А. Трофимов, Анастасия А. Карицкая. 2023. «Поиск оптимальной модели контрольно-надзорной деятельности: опыт России и Китая». Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право 3: 786–803.

Еропкин, Михаил И. 1963. О классификации мер административного принуждения. Вопросы административного права на современном этапе. М.: Юрид. лит.

Зырянов, Сергей М. 2010. Административный надзор. М.: Юриспруденция.

Кононов, Павел И. 2013. Проблемы административного права и процесса. Киров: Аверс.

Кононов, Павел И. 2023. Актуальные проблемы административного права. М.: Кнорус.

Кропачев, Николай М., Екатерина А. Дмитрикова, Марина Ю. Лаврикова, Александр А. Соловьев. 2023. «Риск-ориентированный подход при организации контроля (надзора) в образовании». Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право 2: 307–317. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.202

Мартынов, Алексей В. 2010. Проблемы правового регулирования административного надзора в России. Административно-процессуальное исследование. М.: Nota Bene.

Ноздрачев, Александр Ф., ред. 2012. Правовое регулирование государственного контроля. М.: Ин-т законодательства и сравнительного правоведения при Правительстве РФ; Анкил.

Попов, Лев Л., Марина С. Студеникина, ред. 2008. Административное право. М.: Норма.

Попова, Вера И., Марина С. Студеникина, ред. 1988. Советское административное право. М.: Юрид. лит.

References

Bakhrakh, Demyan N. 1972. “Administrative coercion in the USSR, its types and main development trends”. Abstract of Dr. Sci. Thesis in Law, Vsesoiuznyi nauchno-issledovatel’skii institut sovetskogo zakonodatel’stva. (In Russian)

Bakhrakh, Demyan N. 2000. Administrative law of Russia. Moscow, Norma Publ.; Infra-M Publ. (In Russian)

Dmitrikova, Ekaterina A., Albert A. Trofimov, Anastasia A. Karitskaya. 2023. “Search for the optimal model of control and supervisory activities: The experience of Russia and China”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 3: 786–803. (In Russian)

Eropkin, Mikhail I. 1963. On the classification of administrative coercion measures. Questions of administrative law at the present stage. Moscow, Iuridicheskaia literatura Publ. (In Russian)

Kononov, Pavel I. 2013. Problems of administrative law and process. Kirov, Avers Publ. (In Russian)

Kononov, Pavel I. 2023. Actual problems of administrative law. Moscow, Knorus Publ. (In Russian)

Kropachev, Nikolay M., Ekaterina A. Dmitrikova, Marina Yu. Lavrikova, Alexandr A. Soloviev. 2023. “Riskoriented approach in state control (supervision) in the field of education”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 2: 307–317. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.202 (In Russian)

Martynov, Aleksei V. 2010. Problems of legal regulation of administrative supervision in Russia. Administrative and procedural research. Moscow, Nota Bene Publ. (In Russian)

Nozdrachev, Alexander F., ed. 2012. Legal regulation of state control. Moscow, Institut zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniia pri Pravitel’stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii Publ.; Ankil Publ. (In Russian)

Popov, Lev L., Marina S. Studenikina, eds. 2008. Administrative law. Moscow, Norma Publ. (In Russian)

Popova, Vera I., Marina S. Studenikina, eds. 1988. Soviet administrative law. Moscow, Iuridicheskaia literature Publ. (In Russian)

Zyrianov, Sergei M. 2010. Administrative supervision. Moscow, Iurisprudentsiia Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2024-10-14

How to Cite

Dmitrikova, E. A. (2024). Preventing violations of mandatory requirements: New qualities of preventive visit. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 15(3), 604–616. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.304

Issue

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research