Ценности в нравственном измерении права: полемика с А.В. Поляковым в трудах П.П. Серкова - взгляд Петербургской школы

Nikolay M.  Kropachev; Vladislav V. Arkhipov

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2023.402

Authors

Nikolay M. Kropachev St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
Vladislav V. Arkhipov St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.402

Abstract

The article presents a general characterization of three monographs by professor Peter Pavlovich Serkov — “Legal relationship (Morality of modern legal regulation)”, “Legal relationship (Theory and practice of modern legal policy). Part one: legal doctrine and measures of legal policy” and “Legal relationship (Theory and practice of modern legal policy). Part Two: Generalization of legal experiences of ascent to human, society and state” — and the analysis of some key provisions of the first of these monographs is presented, taking into account the polemics with the Petersburg school of philosophy of law, represented by A. V. Polyakov’s communicative approach to law, which is expressed on the pages of these monographs. The authors emphasize that the problem of the correlation between law and morality is a key problem of both legal theory and legal practice. This issue is particularly relevant in light of the goals and objectives defined by the Fundamentals of State Policy on Preservation and Strengthening of Traditional Russian Spiritual and Moral Values, approved by Presidential Decree No. 809 of 09.11.2022. Moral and ethical values should be taken into account in the processes of creating legal rules, applying legal rules, interpreting the law precisely because the value aspect in the law, expressed in its moral dimension, is an integral part of the law itself or a necessary condition for its existence and functioning — this idea unites the works of both professor P. P. Serkov and professor A. V. Polyakov. And, moreover, despite the criticism targeted at A. V. Polyakov as presented in the monograph of P. P. Serkov, in view of the authors of this article, one can see more similarities between the positions of the authors than differences — this applies to the general methodology and individual provisions, relating, first of all, to the ideas about the importance of morality (morality) for the legal system, the subject of law, the principle of mutual legal recognition.

Keywords:

law, morality, ethics, values, theory of law, philosophy of law, communicative theory of law

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Архипов, Владислав В. 2005. «Предисловие переводчика. Г. Л. А. Харт. Позитивизм и разграничение права и морали». Правоведение 5 (262): 102–104.

Булыгин, Евгений В. 2016a. «Мое видение рациональности права». Евгений Викторович Булыгин. Избранные работы по теории и философии права, 11–17. СПб.: Алеф-Пресс.

Булыгин, Евгений В. 2016b. «Что такое правовой позитивизм?» Евгений Викторович Булыгин. Избранные работы по теории и философии права, 28–41. СПб.: Алеф-Пресс.

Кропачев, Николай М., Владислав В. Архипов. 2023. «Традиционные духовно-нравственные ценности в контексте цифровой трансформации общества: теоретико-правовые аспекты». Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право 2 (14): 294–306.

Максимов, Сергей И. 2016. «Концепция правовой реальности». Постклассическая онтология права, 23–59. СПб.: Алетейя.

Поляков, Андрей В. 2004. Общая теория права: проблемы интерпретации в контексте коммуникативного подхода. СПб.: Изд. дом С.-Петерб. ун-та.

Поляков, Андрей В. 2016. «Права человека и суверенитет государства». Постклассическая онтология права, 295–324. СПб.: Алетейя.

Поляков, Андрей В., Елена В. Тимошина. 2017. Общая теория права. СПб.: Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет.

Поляков, Андрей В. 2021. «Принцип взаимного правового признания: российская философско-правовая традиция и коммуникативный подход к праву». Труды Института государства и права РАН 6 (16): 39–101.

Поляков, Андрей В. 2023. «Постклассическая юриспруденция, эволюционна теория и нейронауки(исповедь коммуникативиста)». Постклассические исследования права: перспективы научно-практической программы, 29–157. СПб.: Алетейя.

Серков, Петр П. 2020. Правоотношение (Нравственность современного правового регулирования). М.: Норма.

Серков, Петр П. 2023a. Правоотношение (Теория и практика современной правовой политики). В 2 ч. Ч. 1: Правовая доктрина и меры правовой политики. М.: Норма.

Серков, Петр П. 2023b. Правоотношение (Теория и практика современной правовой политики). В 2 ч. Ч. 2: Обобщение юридических опытов восхождения к человеку, обществу и государству. М.: Норма.

Синюков, Владимир Н. 2020. «Предисловие. Глазами теоретика правового регулирования (В. Н. Синюков)». Правоотношение (Нравственность современного правового регулирования), 7–15. М.: Норма.

References

Arkhipov, Vladislav V. 2005. “Introduction of the translator. H. L. A. Hart. Positivism and separation of law and morals”. Pravovedenie 5 (262): 102–104. (In Russian)

Bulygin, Evgenii V. 2016a. “My view of rationality of law”. Evgenii Viktorovich Bulygin. Izbrannye raboty po teorii i filosofii prava, 11–17. St. Petersburg, Alef-Press. (In Russian)

Bulygin, Evgenii V. 2016b. “What is legal positivism?” Evgenii Viktorovich Bulygin. Izbrannye raboty po teorii i filosofii prava, 28–41. St. Petersburg, Alef-Press. (In Russian)

Kropachev, Nikolai M., Vladislav V. Arkhipov. 2023. “Traditional spiritual and moral values in the context of digital transformation of society: Aspects of legal theory”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 2 (14): 294–306. (In Russian)

Maksimov, Sergei I. 2016. “The concept of legal reality”. Postklassicheskaia ontologiia prava, 23–59. St. Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ. (In Russian)

Poliakov, Andrei V. 2004. General theory of law: The problems of interpretation in the context of the communicative approach. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press. (In Russian)

Poliakov, Andrei V. 2016. “Human rights and state sovereignty”. Postklassicheskaia ontologiia prava, 295–324. St. Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ. (In Russian)

Poliakov, Andrei V., Elena V. Timoshina. 2017. General theory of law. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press. (In Russian)

Poliakov, Andrei V. 2021. “The principle of mutual legal recognition: Russian philosophical and legal tradition and communicative approach to law”. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN 6 (16): 39–101. (In Russian)

Poliakov, Andrei V. 2023. “Postclassic jurisprudence, evolution theory and neuroscience (confession of a communication scholar)”. Postklassicheskie issledovaniia prava: perspektivy nauchno-prakticheskoi programmy, 29–157. St. Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ. (In Russian)

Serkov, Petr P. 2020. Legal relationship (Morality of the modern legal regulation). Moscow, Norma Publ. (In Russian)

Serkov, Petr P. 2023a. Legal relationship (Theory and practice of modern legal policy). In 2 parts, part 1: Legal doctrine and the measures of legal policy. Moscow, Norma Publ. (In Russian)

Serkov, Petr P. 2023b. Legal relationship (Theory and practice of modern legal policy). In 2 parts, part 2: Generalization of the legal experience of ascent to human, society and state. Moscow, Norma Publ. (In Russian)

Siniukov, Vladimir N. 2020. “Foreword. Through the eyes of the theorist of legal regulation (V. N. Siniukov)”. Legal relationship (Morality of modern legal regulation), 7–15. Moscow, Norma Publ. (In Russian)