Computer games in legal research: On the prerequisites of the regulation model

Authors

  • Vladislav V. Arkhipov St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4566-1454
  • Anton A. Vasiliev Altai State University, 61, pr. Lenina, Barnaul, 656049, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3122-531X
  • Nikolai Yu. Andreev State Academic University for the Humanities, 26, per. Maronovsky, Moscow, 119049, Russian Federation
  • Yulia V. Pechatnova Altai State University, 61, pr. Lenina, Barnaul, 656049, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3091-990X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.101

Abstract

Games in general and computer games in particular have long been a subject of research in legal research starting from the focus on the analogy between law and games (known inter alia from the works by A. Ross). However, by the beginning of the 21st century computer games and, above all, multiplayer computer games (virtual worlds) became an independent subject of legal research, both because of the interest in private legal problems and based on the methodological premise in the spirit of L. Lessig, according to which the study of the legal dimension of multiplayer game worlds, just as it was earlier with the Internet, can provide new knowledge about the law in general. Computer games are a commercially successful type of media, reflecting the acute problems of “digital law” and one of the significant theoretical and legal problems of determining the reasonable limits of law intervention in “non-serious” or “virtual” relationships. To understand the peculiarities of computer games, including for the purposes of legal research and improvement of the model of legal regulation, a broad interdisciplinary view that takes into account the approaches developed in media studies (M. McLuhan, L. Manovich et al.) and in studies of games as such (J. Huizinga and R. Caillois et al.). As a result, computer games can be considered as a kind of new media the qualities of which are reflected in their main legal qualifications — as the results of intellectual activity, information, means of communication and, actually, games. These qualities can be considered as basic for the development of the model of regulation of computer games and the game industry, taking into account the balance of interests of developers, publishers and the game community, as well as taking into account national interests.

Keywords:

computer games, videogames, mediaphilosophy, legal regulation, intellectual property, digital law, virtual worlds, metaverses

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Архипов, Владислав В. 2019. «Действие правовых норм в цифровом медиапространстве и семантические пределы права». Правоведение 63 (1): 8–27.

Гринь (Котенко), Елена С. 2012. «Мультимедийный продукт как объект авторских прав». Дис. … канд. юрид. наук, Московская государственная юридическая академия имени О. Е. Кутафина.

Гринь (Котенко), Елена С. 2013. Авторские права на мультимедийный продукт. М.: Проспект.

Дмитрик, Николай А. 2022. «Люди в своем праве: от правоспособности к идентичности и обратно». Закон 3: 16–31.

Очеретяный, Константин А. 2015. «Тело как медиа: опыт реконструкции». Дис. … канд. филос. наук, Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет.

Рожкова, Марина А. 2022. «Виртуальная реальность и метавселенная: предмет правового исследования». Закон.ру. Дата обращения 25 октября, 2022. https://zakon.ru/blog/2022/01/12/virtualnaya_realnost_i_metavselennaya_predmet_pravovogo_issledovaniya__virtual_reality_and_metaverse.

Савельев, Александр И. 2014a. «Правовая природа виртуальных объектов, приобретаемых за реальные деньги в многопользовательских играх». Вестник гражданского права 1: 127–150.

Савельев, Александр И. 2014b. Электронная коммерция в России и за рубежом: правовое регулирование. М.: Статут.

Савчук, Валерий В. 2014. Медиафилософия. Приступ реальности. СПб.: Издательство Русской христианской гуманитарной академии.

Хёйзинга, Йохан. 1997. Homo Ludens. Статьи по истории культуры. М.: Прогресс-Традиция.

Югай, Инга И. 2007. «Компьютерная игра как вид художественной практики». Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета имени А. И. Герцена 37: 367–372.

Bartle, Richard. 2004. “Pitfalls of virtual property”. Mud.co.uk. Дата обращения 25 октября, 2022. https://mud.co.uk/richard/povp.pdf.

Caillois, Roger. 2001. Man, play and games. Urbana; Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Castronova, Edward. 2004. “The right to play”. New York Law School Law Review 1: 185–210.

Consalvo, Mia. 2009. “There is no magic circle”. Games and Culture 4: 408–417.

Duranske, Benjamin T. 2008. Virtual law. Navigating the legal landscape of virtual worlds. Chicago; Illinois: ABA Publ., American Bar Association.

Fairfield, Joshua. 2005. “Virtual property”. Articles by Maurer Faculty 1787. Дата обращения 25 октября,2022. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/1787.

Fairfield, Joshua. 2009. “The magic circle”. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law 1: 823–840.

Fairfield, Joshua. 2022. “Tokenized: The Law of Non-Fungible Tokens and Unique Digital Property”. Indiana Law Journal 4: 1261–1313.

Galloway, Alexander. 2011. “What is new media? Ten years after ‘The language of new media’”. Criticism 3: 377–384.

Lastowka, Greg. 2013. “Memorandum to file re: The use of video game screenshots in scholarly publications”. Academia.edu. Дата обращения 25 октября, 2022. https://www.academia.edu/4971794/MEMORANDUM_TO_FILE_Re_The_Use_of_Video_Game_Screenshots_in_Scholarly_Publications.

Lessig, Lawrence. 1999. “The law of the horse: What cyberlaw might teach”. Harvard Law Review 113: 501–549.

Manovich, Lev. 2001. The language of new media. London; Cambridge; Massachusetts: MIT Press.

McLuhan, Marshall. 2013. “Laws of the media”. ETC: A Review of General Semantics 70 (4): 449–454.

Meredith, Alexander D. 2014. “The presentation of self in massively multiplayer online games”. Dr. Thesis in Philosophy, Nottingham Trent University. Дата обращения 25 октября, 2022. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30624339.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3axl7smS0gxOMIGyArw4echEWigB1hrZ7F6o05PSkWBA6Ehy5-ESZxCNE.

Morningstar, Chip F., Randall Farmer. 1991. “The lessons of Lucasfilm’s Habitat”. Cyberspace: First Steps. Ed. by Michael Benedikt, 273–301. Cambridge; Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Nowak, Kristine L., Jesse Fox. 2018. “Avatars and computer-mediated communication: A review of the definitions, uses, and effects of digital representations”. Review of Communication Research 6: 31–53.

Ross, Alf. 2019. On law and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stenros, Jaakko. 2012. “In defence of magic circle: The social and mental boundaries of play”. Proceedings of DiGRA Nordic 2012 Conference: Local and Global — Games in Culture and Society. Tampere. Дата обращения 25 октября, 2022. http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/12168.43543.pdf.

References

Arkhipov, Vladislav V. 2019. “The effect of legal norms in the digital media space and the semantic limits of law”. Pravovedenie 63 (1): 8–27. (In Russian)

Bartle, Richard. 2004. “Pitfalls of virtual property”. Mud.co.uk. Accessed October 25, 2022. https://mud.co.uk/richard/povp.pdf.

Caillois, Roger. 2001. Man, play and games. Urbana; Chicago, University of Illinois Press.

Castronova, Edward. 2004. “The right to play”. New York Law School Law Review 1: 185–210.

Consalvo, Mia. 2009. “There is no magic circle”. Games and Culture 4: 408–417.

Dmitrik, Nikolai A. 2022. “Humans in their right: From legal capacity to personal identity and back”. Zakon 3: 16–31. (In Russian)

Duranske, Benjamin T. 2008. Virtual law. Navigating the legal landscape of virtual worlds. Chicago; Illinois, ABA Publ., American Bar Association.

Fairfield, Joshua. 2005. “Virtual property”. Articles by Maurer Faculty 1787. Accessed October 25, 2022. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/1787.

Fairfield, Joshua. 2009. “The magic circle”. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law 1: 823–840.

Fairfield, Joshua. 2022. “Tokenized: The Law of Non-Fungible Tokens and Unique Digital Property”. Indiana Law Journal 4: 1261–1313.

Galloway, Alexander. 2011. “What is new media? Ten years after ‘The language of new media’”. Criticism 3: 377–384.

Grin’ (Kotenko), Elena S. 2012. “Multimedia product as an object of copyright”. PhD Thesis in Law, Moskovskaia gosudarstvennaia iuridicheskaia akademiia imeni O. E. Kutafina. (In Russian)

Grin’ (Kotenko), Elena S. 2013. Copyright to multimedia product. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. (In Russian)

Huizinga, Johan. 1997. Homo Ludens. Articles on cultural history. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiia Publ. (In Russian)

Iugai, Inga I. 2007. “Computer game as a genre of creative art practice”. Izvestiia Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A. I. Gertsena 37: 367–372. (In Russian)

Lastowka, Greg. 2013. “Memorandum to file re: The use of video game screenshots in scholarly publications”. Academia.edu. Accessed October 25, 2022. https://www.academia.edu/4971794/MEMORANDUM_TO_FILE_Re_The_Use_of_Video_Game_Screenshots_in_Scholarly_Publications.

Lessig, Lawrence. 1999. “The law of the horse: What cyberlaw might teach”. Harvard Law Review 113: 501–549.

Manovich, Lev. 2001. The language of new media. London; Cambridge; Massachusetts, MIT Press.

McLuhan, Marshall. 2013. “Laws of the media”. ETC: A Review of General Semantics 70 (4): 449–454.

Meredith, Alexander D. 2014. “The presentation of self in massively multiplayer online games”. Dr. Thesis in Philosophy, Nottingham Trent University. Accessed October 25, 2022. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30624339.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3axl7smS0gxOMIGyArw4echEWigB1hrZ7F6o05PSkWBA6Ehy5-ESZxCNE.

Morningstar, Chip F., Randall Farmer. 1991. “The lessons of Lucasfilm’s Habitat”. Cyberspace: First Steps. Ed. by Michael Benedikt, 273–301. Cambridge; Massachusetts, MIT Press.

Nowak, Kristine L., Jesse Fox. 2018. “Avatars and computer-mediated communication: A review of the definitions, uses, and effects of digital representations”. Review of Communication Research 6: 31–53.

Ocheretianyi, Konstantin A. 2015. “The body as media: Experience of reconstruction”. PhD Thesis in Philosophy, St Petersburg State University. (In Russian)

Ross, Alf. 2019. On law and justice. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Rozhkova, Marina A. 2022. “Virtual reality and metaverse: The subject of legal research”. Zakon.ru. Accessed October 25, 2022. https://zakon.ru/blog/2022/01/12/virtualnaya_realnost_i_metavselennaya_predmet_pravovogo_issledovaniya__virtual_reality_and_metaverse. (In Russian)

Savchuk, Valerii V. 2014. Mediaphilosophy. Assault of reality. St Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii Publ. (In Russian)

Savel’ev, Aleksandr I. 2014a. “Legal nature of virtual objects purchased for real money in multi-player games”. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava 1: 127–150. (In Russian)

Savel’ev, Aleksandr I. 2014b. Electronic commerce in Russia and abroad: Legal regulation. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Stenros, Jaakko. 2012. “In defence of magic circle: The social and mental boundaries of play”. Proceedings of DiGRA Nordic 2012 Conference: Local and Global — Games in Culture and Society. Tampere. Accessed October 25, 2022. http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/12168.43543.pdf.

Published

2023-03-02

How to Cite

Arkhipov, V. V., Vasiliev, A. A., Andreev, N. Y., & Pechatnova, Y. V. (2023). Computer games in legal research: On the prerequisites of the regulation model. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 14(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.101

Issue

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research