Corrective action for prisoners of war: International legal, penal and other regulation

Authors

  • Pavel V. Teplyashin Siberian Legal Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
  • Andrey Petrovich Skiba Academy of the Federal Penitentiary Ser-vice of Russia
  • Natalia S. Maloletkina Samara Law Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.207

Abstract

The article substantiates the relevance of the study of the peculiarities of the application of means of correction in relation to convicted prisoners of war. The article answers the question of in what places of forced confinement it is allowed to isolate the above-mentioned persons —
in correctional institutions of the Russian penal and correctional system with separate detention from prisoners sentenced to imprisonment or in other places of forced confinement? The provisions of the Geneva Convention of 1949 “On the Treatment of Prisoners of War” are analysed in order to identify the specifics of treatment of this category of convicts. It is proposed to supplement it with a provision according to which there should be a prohibition to allow persons who suffered (or their relatives suffered) from the results of military actions
to work with prisoners of war. The paper substantiates the necessity of implementing the principle of differentiation and individualisation in relation to prisoners of war convicted of various types of crimes, who have relapsed into crime (such cases are not uncommon, especially among mercenary combatants) or who have other socio-legal or personal characteristics. It is concluded that it is advisable, taking into account the provisions of international settlement
documents at the national level in penal and other legislation, such issues as determining the places of detention of convicted prisoners of war, the scope of legal restrictions in relation to them, ensuring external and internal isolation, the content of educational work with them, including the use of measures incentives and penalties, their employment, providing social influence, organizing medical care.

Keywords:

combat situation, martial law, corrective and preventive action, disarmed combatant, war crimes, human dignity

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Боев, Валерий И. 2007. Уголовное право военного времени. М.: Спутник+.

Ермолович, Ярослав Н. 2012. «Влияние норм международного права на военно-уголовное законодательство Российской Федерации». Библиотека криминалиста. Научный журнал 1 (2): 252–267.

Крымов, Александр А., ред. 2022. Уголовно-исполнительное законодательство в условиях стихийного бедствия, введения чрезвычайного или военного положения. 4‑е изд., испр. и доп. М.: Криминологическая библиотека.

Куликов, Владислав. 2021. «Первое мультиучреждение ФСИН может появиться в ближайшем к Москве регионе». Российская газета. Дата обращения 20 мая, 2024. https://rg.ru/2021/03/12/reg-cfo/pervoe-multiuchrezhdenie-fsin-mozhet-poiavitsia-v-blizhajshem-k-moskve-regione.html.

Ображиев, Константин В. 2016. «Перспективы кодификации военно-уголовного законодательства». Современное состояние и пути развития уголовного права Российской Федерации: научные и учебно-методические аспекты: сб. материалов Всерос. науч.-практ. конф., посвящ. памяти профессоров кафедры уголовного права В. А. Елеонского и Н. А. Огурцова, под ред. Валерия Ф. Лапшина, 274–280. Рязань: Академия ФСИН России.

Arman, Jemma, Jean-Marie Henckaerts, Heleen Hiemstra, Kvitoslava Krotiuk. 2020. “The updated ICRC Commentary on the Third Geneva Convention: A new tool to protect prisoners of war in the twenty-first century”. International Review of the Red Cross 102 (913): 389–416.

Biller, Jeffrey. 2018. “Cyber operations and the Second Geneva Convention”. International Review of the Red Cross 100 (1–2–3): 165–183.

Jacques, Johanna. 2021. “A ‘most astonishing’ circumstance: The survival of Jewish POWs in German war captivity during the Second World War”. Social & Legal Studies 30 (3): 362–383.

Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena. 2017. “Misidentification of victims under international criminal law. An attempted offence?” Journal of International Criminal Justice 15 (2): 291–318.

Khaji, Ali, Seyed M. Tabatabaei, Ahmad Mashkoori. 2020. “Protection of prisoners of war from torture with proper selection of soldiers taking care of POWs: An ethical view”. Trauma Monthly 25 (2): 67–70.

Scheck, Raffael. 2021. “The treatment of western prisoners of war in Nazi Germany: Rethinking reciprocity and asymmetry”. War in History 28 (3): 635–655.

Wylie, Neville, Lindsey Cameron. 2019. “The impact of World War I on the law governing the treatment of prisoners of war and the making of a humanitarian subject”. The European Journal of International Law 29 (4): 1327–1350.

References

Arman, Jemma, Jean-Marie Henckaerts, Heleen Hiemstra, Kvitoslava Krotiuk. 2020. “The updated ICRC Commentary on the Third Geneva Convention: A new tool to protect prisoners of war in the twenty-first century”. International Review of the Red Cross 102 (913): 389–416.

Biller, Jeffrey. 2018. “Cyber operations and the Second Geneva Convention”. International Review of the Red Cross 100 (1-2-3): 165–183.

Boev, Valerii I. 2007. Wartime criminal law. Moscow, Sputnik+ Publ. (In Russian)

Ermolovich, Iaroslav N. 2012. “The influence of international law on the military criminal legislation of the Russian Federation”. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal 1 (2): 252–267. (In Russian)

Jacques, Johanna. 2021. “A ‘most astonishing’ circumstance: The survival of Jewish POWs in German war captivity during the Second World War”. Social & Legal Studies 30 (3): 362–383.

Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena. 2017. “Misidentification of victims under international criminal law. An attempted offence?” Journal of International Criminal Justice 15 (2): 291–318.

Khaji, Ali, Seyed M. Tabatabaei, Ahmad Mashkoori. 2020. “Protection of prisoners of war from torture with proper selection of soldiers taking care of POWs: An ethical view”. Trauma Monthly 25 (2): 67–70.

Krymov, Aleksandr A., ed. 2022. Criminal-executive legislation in conditions of a natural disaster, the introduction of a state of emergency or martial law. 4th ed., rev. and suppl. Moscow, Kriminologicheskaia biblioteka Publ. (In Russian)

Kulikov, Vladislav. 2021. “The first multi-institution of the Federal Penitentiary Service may appear in the region closest to Moscow”. Rossiiskaia gazeta. Accessed May 20, 2024. https://rg.ru/2021/03/12/reg-cfo/pervoe-multiuchrezhdenie-fsin-mozhet-poiavitsia-v-blizhajshem-k-moskve-regione.html. (In Russian)

Obrazhiev, Konstantin V. 2016. “Prospects for the codification of military criminal legislation”. Sovremennoe sostoianie i puti razvitiia ugolovnogo prava Rossiiskoi Federatsii: nauchnye i uchebno-metodicheskie aspekty: sbornik materialov Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, posviashchennoi pamiati professorov kafedry prava V. A. Eleonskogo i N. A. Ogurtsova, ed. by Valerii F. Lapshin, 274–280. Ryazan, Akademiia FSIN Rossii Publ. (In Russian)

Scheck, Raffael. 2021. “The treatment of western prisoners of war in Nazi Germany: Rethinking reciprocity and asymmetry”. War in History 28 (3): 635–655.

Wylie, Neville, Lindsey Cameron. 2019. “The impact of World War I on the law governing the treatment of prisoners of war and the making of a humanitarian subject”. The European Journal of International Law 29 (4): 1327–1350.

Published

2024-08-07

How to Cite

Teplyashin, P. V., Skiba, A., & Maloletkina, N. S. (2024). Corrective action for prisoners of war: International legal, penal and other regulation. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 15(2), 422–434. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.207

Issue

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research