Non-use of subjective rights in Russian criminal proceedings: Causes and consequences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.305Abstract
The modern paradigm of criminal proceedings, which is based on the idea of the primacy of the protection of the individual, necessitates not only endowing the participants in the criminal process with a set of rights that allow them to defend their interests, but also ensuring the proper level of guarantees for the possibility of their implementation. The article examines the social and legal significance of the use of rights by participants in criminal proceedings, highlights and analyzes the possible causes and consequences of non-use. The author comes to the conclusion that the state and society are interested in the active use of their rights by authorized subjects. In criminal proceedings, the need for such an implementation is determined by the expansion of discretion and adversarial principle. As a result of the study, it was found that the non-use of subjective right in criminal proceedings can be both due to the will of the person (there is a waiver of subjective right), and not depend on it and be the result of lawful or unlawful behavior of representatives of public authorities conducting criminal proceedings. The reason for non-realization of a subjective right in a criminal process may also be the improper performance by officials of their duties to ensure that participants can exercise their rights, abuse of power or abuse of power. The article concludes that these reasons cause different social and legal consequences of non-use of subjective rights: both positive and negative.
Keywords:
ensuring rights, individual rights guarantees, subjective rights, subjective rights waiver, dispositivity of criminal proceedings
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Библиография
Алексеев, Сергей С. 2016. Избранное. Наука права. М.: Статут.
Андреева, Ольга И. 2004. «Свобода поведения потерпевшего как участника уголовного судопроизводства со стороны обвинения». Вестник Томского государственного университета 283: 36–38.
Артамонова, Елена А. 2019. «Волеизъявление обвиняемого (подозреваемого) как уголовно-процессуальная категория». Всероссийский криминологический журнал 6: 1025–1034. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(6).1025-1034
Бабаев, Владимир К., ред. 2003. Теория государства и права. М.: Юристъ.
Бакулина, Лилия Т., ред. 2017. Проблемы теории права и правореализации. М.: Статут.
Барабаш, Александр С. 2017. «К вопросу о содержании диспозитивности в современном уголовном процессе». Вестник Уральского юридического института МВД России 4: 37–40.
Бекбаев, Ерзат З. 2011. «Субъективное право и юридическая обязанность в механизме правового регулирования». Проблемы экономики и юридической практики 3: 37–39.
Братусь, Сергей Н. 1947. Юридические лица в советском гражданском праве. М.: Юридическое издательство Министерства юстиции СССР.
Витрук, Николай В. 2018. Общая теория правового положения личности. М.: Норма; ИНФРА-М.
Гамбарян, Артур С. 2019. «Пассивное поведение (бездействие): использование субъективного права или отказ от реализации субъективного права». Lex Russica (Русский закон) 2: 29–40. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.147.2.029-040
Головко, Леонид В., ред. 2017. Курс уголовного процесса. М.: Статут.
Дикарев, Игорь С. 2005. Диспозитивность в уголовном процессе России. Волгоград: Волгоградский гос. ун-т.
Исаков, Владимир Б., ред. 2015. Основы права. М.: ИНФРА-М.
Кудрявцев, Владимир Н. 1978. Право и поведение. М.: Юридическая литература.
Куцова, Элеонора Ф. 1973. Гарантии прав личности в советском уголовном процессе. М.: Юридическая литература.
Липинский, Дмитрий А., Антон Г. Шишкин. 2014. «Субъективное право и юридическая обязанность, как меры позитивной юридической ответственности». Государство и право 10: 5–14.
Лукашева, Елена А., ред. 2011. Права человека. М.: Норма; ИНФРА-М.
Макарова, Зинаида В. 2008. Профессиональная защита подозреваемых, обвиняемых. СПб.: Издательский центр Пресс.
Малиновский, Алексей. А. 2006. «Назначение субъективного права». Правоведение 4: 222–230.
Масленникова, Лариса Н. 2018. «Субъективные права и юридические обязанности — внутрисистемные факторы, определяющие тенденции». Вестник Университета имени О. Е. Кутафина 2: 38–46. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2018.42.2.038-046
Масленникова, Лариса Н., ред. 2017. Доказывание и принятие решений в состязательном уголовном судопроизводстве. М.: Норма; ИНФРА-М.
Матузов, Николай И. 1999. «О праве в объективном и субъективном смыслах». Правоведение 4 (227): 129–143.
Матузов Николай И., Александр В. Малько. 2004. Теория государства и права. М.: Юрист.
Матузов, Николай И., Александр В. Малько, ред. 2005. Правовая жизнь в современной России: теоретико-методологический аспект. Саратов: Саратовская государственная академия права.
Михайловская, Инга Б. 2006. Настольная книга судьи по доказыванию в уголовном процессе. М.: ТК Велби; Проспект.
Рябинина, Татьяна К., Дарья О. Чистилина. 2021. «Полномочия председательствующего в суде с участием присяжных заседателей в контексте состязательных начал российского уголовного судопроизводства». Вестник Томского государственного университета. Право 41: 64–76.
Стецовский, Юрий И. 2007. Адвокатура и государство. М.: Юристъ.
Хатуаева, Виктория В. 2008. «Соотношение публичного и частного (диспозитивного) начал в современном уголовном судопроизводстве». Общество и право 2 (20): 207–211.
Чеботарева, Ирина Н., Олеся С. Пашутина, Ирина В. Ревина. 2020. Отказ от субъективного права как феномен в уголовном процессе России. Курск: Юго-Западный государственный университет; Университетская книга.
Шабуров, Анатолий С. 2012. «Обязанности человека в рамках концепции прав человека». Вестник Тюменского государственного университета 3: 197–203.
Якимович, Юрий К. 2015. Участники уголовного процесса. СПб.: Юридический центр.
Berg, Jessica W. 2003. “Understanding Waiver”. Houston Law Review 40 (2): 281–344.
Besson, Samanta. 2015. “Human Rights Waivers and the Right to Do Wrong Under the European Convention on Human Rights”. Mélanges en l’honneur de / Essays in honour of Dean Spielmann. Eds Josep Casadevall, Guido Raimondi, Erik Fribergh, Patrick Titiun, Peter Kempees, John Darcy, Nicole Lehner, Nathalie Donath, 23–35. Oisterwijk: Wolf Legal Publ.
Caflisch, Lucius 2011. “Waivers in International and European Human Rights Law”. Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman. Eds Mahnoush H. Arsanjani, Jacob Cogan, 407–431. Boston: Brill.
De Schutter, Olivier. 2000. “Waiver of Rights and State Paternalism under the European Convention of Human Rights”. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 51 (23): 481–508.
Ryapolova, Yaroslava P. 2021. “Participation of an attorney in the initial stage of criminal proceedings under Russian law”. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social and Community Studies 16 (1): 215–229. https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-7576/CGP/v16i01/215-229
Scott, Brittany. 2019. “Waiving Goodbye to First Amendment Protections: First Amendment Waiver by Contract”. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 46 (2): 451–478.
Stuntz, William J. 1989. “Waiving Rights in Criminal Procedure”. Virginia Law Review 75 (4): 761–842. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073136
References
Alekseev, Sergei S. 2016. Selected works. Science of law. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Andreeva, Olga I. 2004. “Freedom of the injured person’s bevabiour as a participant of the criminal legal proceedings on the part of the prosecution”. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 283: 36–38. (In Russian)
Artamonova, Elena A. 2019. “The expression of the will of the accused (the suspect) as a criminal procedure category”. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal 13 (6): 1025–1034. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(6).1025-1034 (In Russian)
Babaev, Vladimir K., ed. 2003. Theory of state and law. Moscow, Iurist" Publ. (In Russian)
Bakulina, Liliia T., ed. 2017. Problems of the theory of law and law enforcement. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Barabash, Aleksandr S. 2017. “To the question of the content of disposition in the modern criminal process”. Vestnik Ural’skogo iuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii 4: 37–40 (In Russian)
Bekbaev, Erzat Z. 2011. “Subjective rights and legal obligation in the mechanism of legal regulation”. Problemy ekonomiki i iuridicheskoi praktiki 3: 37–39. (In Russian)
Berg, Jessica W. 2003. “Understanding Waiver”. Houston Law Review 40 (2): 281–344.
Besson, Samanta. 2015. “Human Rights Waivers and the Right to Do Wrong Under the European Convention on Human Rights”. Mélanges en l’honneur de / Essays in honour of Dean Spielmann. Eds Josep Casadevall, Guido Raimondi, Erik Fribergh, Patrick Titiun, Peter Kempees, John Darcy, Nicole Lehner, Nathalie Donath, 23–35. Oisterwijk, Wolf Legal Publ.
Bratus, Sergei N. 1947. Legal entities in Soviet civil law. Moscow, Ministerstvo iustitsii SSSR Publ. (In Russian)
Caflisch, Lucius 2011. “Waivers in International and European Human Rights Law”. Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman. Eds Mahnoush H. Arsanjani, Jacob Cogan, 407–431. Boston, Brill.
Chebotareva, Irina N., Olesia S. Pashutina, Irina V. Revina. 2020. “Waiver of subjective right as a phenomenon in the criminal process of Russia”. Kursk, Universitetskaia kniga Publ. (In Russian)
De Schutter, Olivier. 2000. “Waiver of Rights and State Paternalism under the European Convention of Human Rights”. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 51 (23): 481–508.
Dikarev, Igor S. 2005. Dispositiveness in the criminal process in Russia. Volgograd, Volgogradskii gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)
Gambaryan, Artur S. 2019. “Passive Behaviour (Omission to Act): Implementation of a Legal Right or a Waiver of Implementation of a Legal Right”. Lex Russica 2: 29–40. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.147.2.029-040 (In Russian)
Golovko, Leonid V., ed. 2017. Course of criminal procedure. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Iakimovich, Iurii K. 2015. Participants in criminal proceedings. St. Pettersburg, Iuridicheskii tsentr Publ. (In Russian)
Isakov, Vladimir B., ed. 2015. Law basics. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ. (In Russian)
Khatuaeva, Viktoriia V. 2008. “The ratio of public and private (dispositive) began in modern criminal proceedings”. Obshchestvo i pravo 2 (20): 207–211. (In Russian)
Kudriavtsev, Vladimir N. 1978. Law and conduct. Moscow, Iuridicheskaia literatura Publ. (In Russian)
Kutsova, Eleonora F. 1973. Guarantees of individual rights in the Soviet criminal process. Moscow, Iuridicheskaia literatura Publ. (In Russian)
Lipinskii, Dmitrii A., Anton G. Shishkin. 2014. “The subjective right and legal obligation as measures of positive legal responsibility”. Gosudarstvo i parvo 10: 5–14. (In Russian)
Lukasheva, Elena A., ed. 2011. Human rights. Moscow, Norma Publ.; INFRA-M Publ. (In Russian)
Makarova, Zinaida V. 2008. Professional defense of suspects, accused. St. Petersburg, Izdatel’skii tsentr Press Publ. (In Russian)
Malinovsky, Alexey. A. 2006. “Appointment of subjective law”. Pravovedenie 4: 222–230. (In Russian)
Maslennikova, Larisa N. 2018. “Subjective rights and legal duties — internal factors determining trends in the development of criminal justice”. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina 2: 38–46. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2018.42.2.038-046 (In Russian)
Maslennikova, Larisa N., ed. 2017. Evidence and decision-making in adversarial criminal proceedings. Moscow, Norma Publ.; INFRA-M Publ. (In Russian)
Matuzov, Nikolai I. 1999. “On Law in the Objective and Subjective Senses”. Pravovedenie 4 (227): 129–143.(In Russian)
Matuzov, Nikolai I., Aleksandr V. Mal’ko. 2004. Theory of the state and law. Moscow, Iurist Publ. (In Russian)
Matuzov, Nikolai I., Aleksandr V. Mal’ko, eds. 2005. Legal life in modern Russia: Theoretical and methodological aspect. Saratov, Saratovskaia gosudarstvennaia akademiia prava Publ. (In Russian)
Mikhailovskaia, Inga B. 2006. Judge’s Desk Book on Evidence in Criminal Procedure. Moscow, TK Velbi Publ., Prospekt Publ. (In Russian)
Riabinina, Tat’iana K., Dar’ia O. Chistilina. 2021. “Powers of the presiding judge in a jury trial in the context of adversarial principles of Russian criminal procedure”. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.Pravo 41: 64–76. (In Russian)
Ryapolova, Yaroslava P. 2021. “Participation of an attorney in the initial stage of criminal proceedings under Russian law”. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social and Community Studies 16 (1): 215–229. https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-7576/CGP/v16i01/215-229
Scott, Brittany. 2019. “Waiving Goodbye to First Amendment Protections: First Amendment Waiver by Contract”. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 46 (2): 451–478.
Shaburov, Anatolii S. 2012. “Duties of a person within the framework of the concept of human rights”. Vestnik Tiumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 3: 197–203. (In Russian)
Stetsovskii, Iurii I. 2007. Advocacy and the state. Moscow, Iurist" Publ. (In Russian)
Stuntz, William J. 1989. “Waiving Rights in Criminal Procedure”. Virginia Law Review 75 (4): 761–842. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073136
Vitruk, Nikolai V. 2018. General theory of the legal status of the individual. Moscow, Norma Publ.; INFRA-M Publ. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
2023-09-28
How to Cite
Chebotareva, I. N. (2023). Non-use of subjective rights in Russian criminal proceedings: Causes and consequences. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 14(3), 629–648. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.305
Issue
Section
Public and Private Law: Applied Research
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
