Prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of genetic characteristics in US legislation and judicial practice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.418

Abstract

The article examines current problems of discrimination on the grounds of genetic characteristics. For the first time, this problem was seriously raised by the scientific community in the USA, becoming a topic of debate and one of the areas of state legal policy. As a result, numerous laws were drafted and adopted both at the state and federal levels to prohibit disclosure of confidential human genetic information, as well as its misuse in areas of employment, insurance, education, housing, etc. The analysis of legislation and judicial practice has shown that the adopted measures have introduced common basic standards, according to which employment or promotion decisions should be based on qualifications and a person’s ability to perform a job, and not on the basis of presumed genetic factors that do not influence the effectiveness of their work at the current time. Insurance companies should take into account an individual’s current state of health, and the amount of rates and premiums should not be adjusted on the basis of predictive genetic information. Therefore, it is prohibited to discriminate on the basis of predictive genetic information and not on the basis of a pre-existing condition. The confidentiality of the results of genetic testing should be protected and the results of testing should not be disclosed to third parties (including insurance companies or employers). At the same time, federal genetic nondiscrimination law should not interfere with state laws that provide a higher level of protection against genetic discrimination, for example in housing, education, mortgages, etc.

Keywords:

genetic nondiscrimination law, discrimination on the grounds of genetic characteristics, predictive genetic information, confidentiality of genetic information, right to privacy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография/References

Aston, Geri.1997. “Ban genetic discrimination?” American Medical News 34. Accessed June 17, 2020. https://www.ama-assn.org/sci pubs/amnews/pick_97/pickO5O5.htm.

Bilkey, Gemma A., Gareth Baynam, Caron Molster. 2018. “Changes to the employers’ use of genetic information and non-discrimination for health insurance in the USA: implications for Australians”. Front Public Health 6: 183–186.

Billings, Paul R., Mel A. Kohn, Margaret De Cuevas, Jonathan R. Beckwith.1992. “Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing”. American journal of human genetics 50 (3): 476–482.

Geller, Lisa. 1996. “Individual, family and societal dimensions of genetic discrimination: A case study analysis”. Science & Engineering Ethics 2: 71–88.

Gostin, Lawrence О. 1991. “Genetic discrimination: the use of genetically based diagnostic and prognostic tests by employers and insurers”. American journal of law & medicine 17 (1–2): 109–144.

Greenhouse, Steven. 2010. “Ex-worker says she lost job because of genetic test”. The New York Times. Accessed May 10, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/01/us/01gene.html

Hadley, Donald W., Jean Jenkins, Eileen Dimond, Kenneth Nakahara, Liam Grogan, David J. Liewehr, Seth M. Steinberg, Ilan Kirsch. 2003. “Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer”. Archives of Internal Medicine 163 (5): 573–582.

Hathaway, Katherine A. 2002. “Federal genetic nondiscrimination legislation: the new ‘right’ and the race to protect DNA at the local, state, and federal level”. Catholic University Law Review 52 (1): 77–133.

Hendricks-Sturrup, Rachele. 2020. “A closer look at genetic data privacy and nondiscrimination in 2020”. Accessed June 17, 2020. https://fpf.org/2020/03/02/a-closer-look-at-genetic-data-privacy-andnondiscrimination-in-2020.

Hudson, Kathy. 2004. “Genetic non-discrimination: Examining the implications for workers and employers”. 108th US Congress, Washington. Accessed June 18, 2020. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-108hhrg94940/html/CHRG-108hhrg94940.htm.

Joly, Yann, Gratien Dalpé, Charles Dupras, Bénédicte Bévière-Boyer, Aisling de Paor, Edward S. Dove, Palmira Granados Moreno, Calvin W. L. Ho, Chih-Hsing Ho, Katharina Ó Cathaoir, Kazuto Kato, Hannah Kim, Lingqiao Song, Timo Minssen, Pilar Nicolás, Margaret Otlowski, Anya E. R. Prince, Athira P. S. Nair, Ine Van Hoyweghen, Torsten H. Voigt, Chisato Yamasaki, Yvonne Bombard. 2020. “Establishing the International Genetic Discrimination Observatory”. Nature Genetic 52: 466–468.

Lefebvre, Ken. 2015. “Genetic discrimination law in the United States: A socioethical & legal analysis of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)”. Master’s degree, University of Massachusetts.

McLochlin, Deborah L. 2001. “Whose genetic information is it anyway? A legal analysis of the effects that mapping the human genome will have on privacy rights and genetic discrimination”. Journal of Computer & Information Law 19 (4): 609–646.

Quick, John J. 2005. “Genetic discrimination and the need for federal legislation”. The Journal of Biolaw and Business 8 (1): 22–26.

Rich, Robert F., Julian Ziegler. 2005. “Genetic discrimination in health insurance — comprehensive legal solutions for a (not so) special problem?” Indiana Health Law Review 2 (1): 1–47.

Slaughter, Louise. 2006. “Genetic testing and discrimination: How private is your information?” Stanford Law & Policy Review 17 (67): 67–82.

Suter, Sonia M. 2001. “The allure and peril of genetics exceptionalism: do we need special genetics legislation?” Washington University Law Quaterly 79 (3): 669–748.

Suter, Sonia M. 2018. “GINA at 10 years: the battle over ‘genetic information’ continues in court”. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 5 (3): 495–526.

Published

2022-02-10

How to Cite

Dallakyan, L. (2022). Prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of genetic characteristics in US legislation and judicial practice. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 12(4), 1095–1108. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.418

Issue

Section

Foreign and International Law