Применение методов толкования и аналогии права в деятельности суда и органа конституционного контроля в Республике Казахстан

Ermek B. Abdrasulov; Aizhan E. Abdrasulova

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2020.213

Authors

Ermek B. Abdrasulov L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 2, Satpayeva ul., Nur-Sultan, 010000, Republic of Kazakhstan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4835-9760
Aizhan E. Abdrasulova Kazakh-American Free University, 7b, M. Gor’kogo ul., Ust-Kamenogorsk, 070000, Republic of Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.213

Abstract

The categories of interpretation, concretization and legal analogies in the law enforcement activities of the court and the constitutional control body, as well as the views of scientists about their functional purpose, are the subject of the study. The article analyzes the functions and significance of interpretation, concretization and analogy of law from the perspective of the methodology of legal theory, which envisions the need to study state-legal phenomena by focusing on legal practice and that science is necessary to serve the needs of practice and that practice is a truth-criterion of scientific research. Emphasis is placed on judicial errors arising from a misunderstanding of judicial interpretation and concretization of legal norms that may border rulemaking. The inadmissibility is substantiated of turning the interpretation of the rule of law into simple commentary results in failing to achieve the effectiveness of legal regulation. The article emphasizes that in law enforcement, concretization is the result and at the same time the goal of the interpretation process since it is a method, a way of interpreting the law, resulting from the fact that the law cannot cover all the nuances of public relations with regulation. Examples of application of interpretation and analogies of law in the activities of the court and the constitutional control body are analyzed based on the practice of courts’ appeals to the Constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The article argues that concretization in law enforcement does not act as an independent category; it is the goal of the interpretation process and at the same time its result. The authors conclude that the wrong choice of the optimal variant for a case’s court decision, without using an analogy in law with various methods and techniques for interpreting legal requirements, can lead to inconsistencies and problems in legal regulation.

Keywords:

interpretation of law, concretization of law, analogy in law, judicial practice, constitutional council

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Абдрасулов, Ермек Б. 2002. Толкование закона и норм Конституции: теория, опыт, процедура. Алматы: Оркениет.

Абдрасулов, Ермек. Б. 2006. «Политико-правовая концепция и толкование норм закона в советской правовой науке». Право и политика 1: 58–63.

Алексеев, Сергей С. 1966. Механизм правового регулирования в социалистическом государстве. М.: Юридическая литература.

Алимбеков, Мусабек Т. ред. 2009. Юридическая природа нормативных постановлений Верховного суда РК. Астана: Б. и.

Власенко, Николай А. 2013. «Кризис права: проблемы и подходы к решению». Журнал российского права 8: 43–54.

Власенко, Николай А., Максим В. Залоило. 2016. «Конкретизация и толкование права как творческое содержание судебной практики». Журнал российского права 8: 43–57.

Вопленко, Николай Н. 1976. Официальное толкование норм права. М.: Юридическая литература.

Ершов, Валентин В. 1992. «Суд в системе органов государственной власти». Государство и право 8: 31–37.

Ершов, Валентин В. 2017. Правовое и индивидуальное регулирование общественных отношений. М.: Российский государственный университет правосудия.

Залоило, Максим В. 2010. «Конкретизация и толкование юридических норм: проблемы соотношения и взаимодействия». Журнал российского права 5: 105–112.

Милюков, Сергей Ф. 2000. Российское уголовное законодательство: опыт критического анализа. СПб.: Знание СПбИВЭСЭП.

Пиголкин, Альберт С. 1998. «Толкование норм права и правотворчество: проблемы соотношения». Закон: создание и толкование, под ред. А. С. Пиголкина, 65–75. М.: Спарк.

Строгович, Михаил С. 1939. Природа советского уголовного процесса и принцип состязательности. М.: Юридическое издательство НКЮ СССР.

Тихонравов, Евгений Ю. 2016. «Соотношение распространительного толкования права и аналогии закона». Академический юридический журнал 2(64): 4–10.

Шмелева, Галина Г. 2019. «Соотношение толкования и конкретизации юридических норм». Толкование правовых актов. Право и суд (теоретико-правовой, конституционно-правовой, гражданско-правовой, трудо-правовой аспекты): материалы II Всероссийской науч.-практ. конф.,138–142. Симферополь: Крымский федеральный университет им. В. И. Вернадского.

Amaya, Amalia. 2018.“Imitation and analogy”. Analogy and Exemplary Reasoning in Legal Discourse, 13–31, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Сanale, Domiano, Giovanni Tuzet. 2016. “Analogical Reasoning and Extensive Interpretation” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 102(4): 1–15. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2887922.

Coyle, Sean 2006. “Positivism, idealism and the rule of law”. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26(2): 257–288.

Coyle, Sean 2007. From Positivism to Idealism. A Study of the Moral Dimensions of Legality. Bodmin, Cornwall: MPG Books Ltd.

Llevelin, Karl N. 1988. “The Case law system in Amerika”. Columbia Law Review 88(5): 989–1020.

Lundmark, Thomas. 2012. Charting the Divide between Common and Civil Law. New York: Oxford University Press.

Pospisil, Leopold J. 1971. Anthropology of Law: a Comparative Theory. New York: Harper & Row Publ.

Svensson, Roswitha 1982. Konkretisierung von Rechtsnоrmen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

Windscheid, Вernhard 1874. Leherbuch des Pandektsrechts. Düsseldorf: Verlagshandlung von Julius Buddeus.

References

Abdrasulov, Ermek B. 2002. Interpretation of the law and the norms of the Constitution: theory, experience, procedure. Almaty, Orkeniet Publ. (In Russian)

Abdrasulov, Ermek B. 2006. “Political and legal concept and interpretation of the rule of law in Soviet legal science”. Pravo i politika 1: 58–63 (In Russian)

Alekseev, Sergei S. 1966. The mechanism of legal regulation in a socialist state. Moscow, Iuridicheskaia literatura Publ. (In Russian)

Alimbekov, Musabek T. ed. 2009. The legal nature of regulatory decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Astana, s. p. (In Russian)

Amaya, Amalia. 2018.“Imitation and analogy”. Analogy and Exemplary Reasoning in Legal Discourse, 13–31, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Сanale, Domiano, Giovanni Tuzet. 2016. “Analogical Reasoning and Extensive Interpretation” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 102(4): 1–15. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2887922.

Coyle, Sean 2006. “Positivism, idealism and the rule of law”. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26(2): 257–288.

Coyle, Sean 2007. From Positivism to Idealism. A Study of the Moral Dimensions of Legality. Bodmin, Cornwall: MPG Books Ltd.

Ershov, Valentin V. 1992. “The court in the system of public authorities”. Gosudarstvo i pravo 8: 31–37. (In Russian)

Ershov, Valentin V. 2017. Legal and individual regulation of public relations. Moscow, Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi universitet pravosudiia Publ. (In Russian)

Llevelin, Karl N. 1988. “The Case law system in Amerika”. Columbia Law Review 88(5): 989–1020.

Lundmark, Thomas. 2012. Charting the Divide between Common and Civil Law. New York: Oxford University Press.

Miliukov, Sergei F. 2000. Russian criminal law: the experience of critical analysis. St. Petersburg, Znanie SPbIVESEP Publ.(In Russian)

Pigolkin, Albert S. 1998. “Interpretation of the rule of law and law-making: problems of correlation”. Zakon: sozdanie i tolkovanie, ed. by A. S. Pigolkin, 65–75. Moscow, Spark Publ. (In Russian)

Pospisil, Leopold J. 1971. Anthropology of Law: a Comparative Theory. New York: Harper & Row Publ.

Shmeleva, Galina G. 2019. “Correlation of interpretation and concretization of legal norms”. Tolkovanie pravovykh aktov. Pravo i sud (teoretiko-pravovoi, konstitutsionno-pravovoi, grazhdansko-pravovoi,trudo-pravovoi aspekty): materialy II Vserossiiskoi nauch.-prakt. konf., 138–142. Simferopol’, Krymskii federal’nyi universitet im. V. I. Vernadskogo Publ. (In Russian)

Strogovich, Mikhail S. 1939. The nature of the Soviet criminal process and the principle of competition. Moscow, NKIu SSSR Publ. (In Russian)

Svensson, Roswitha 1982. Konkretisierung von Rechtsnоrmen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

Tikhonravov, Evgenii Iu. 2016. “The correlation of the broad interpretation of law and the analogy of the law”. Akademicheskii iuridicheskii zhurnal 2(64): 4–10. (In Russian)

Vlasenko, Nikolai A. 2013. “The crisis of law: problems and approaches to solving”. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 8: 43–54. (In Russian)

Vlasenko, Nikolai A., Maxim V. Zaloilo. 2016. “Concretization and interpretation of law as the creative content of judicial practice”. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 8: 43–57. (In Russian)

Voplenko, Nikolai. N. 1976. The official interpretation of the rule of law. Moscow, Iuridicheskaia literatura Publ. (In Russian)

Windscheid, Вernhard. 1874. Leherbuch des Pandektsrechts. Düsseldorf, Verlagshandlung von Julius Buddeus.

Zaloilo, Maxim V. 2010. “Concretization and interpretation of legal norms: problems of correlation and interaction”. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 5: 105–112. (In Russian)