Guarantees of taxpayers’ rights in the procedures of pre-judicial appeal: Consistence of legal positions

Authors

  • Маргарита Валерьевна Кустова St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.306

Abstract

The article examines problems of ensuring legal consistency in maintaining the necessary level of guarantees for taxpayers’ rights in procedures for appealing jurisdictional acts of tax authorities. The author finds elements of such inconsistency in the differences in regulation proposed by the tax legislation and the legislation on administrative offences, and in the application of the tax rules themselves. The author analyzes law enforcement acts that allow the correction of the tax authority’s mistakes negative for the state budget without applying the jurisdictional procedure, as a consequence, without observing the rights of taxpayers provided by such procedure. The author analyzes the problem in the context of the judicial position on the inadmissibility of worsening the position of the taxpayer who filed the complaint. The author tells about the inadmissibility of the refusal to apply the tax procedures and the guarantees for taxpayer’s rights established in such procedures due to the lack of tools for the revision of mistaken decisions of the tax authorities entailing property losses of the state. The author believes that the lack of the necessary tools is an occasion to improve the legal regulation of procedures, but not to refrain from using the jurisdictional form. Given the recognition of the public nature of tax relations by the legislator, the author also notes the undesirability of replacing missing jurisdictional procedures for resolving tax and legal conflicts in civil litigation procedures, since this does not provide legal certainty.

Keywords:

guarantees for taxpayer’s rights, worsening the position of the taxpayer, tax jurisdictional procedure, pre-judicial tax appeal, revision of the decision

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Карасева (Сенцова), Марина В. 2017. «Гражданско-правовые меры принуждения в налоговой сфере и защита прав налогоплательщиков». Финансовое право 10: 27–31.

Кононов, Павел И. 2013. Основные категории административного права и процесса. Монография. М.: Юрлитинформ.

Панова, Ирина В. 2007. Административно-процессуальное право России. М.: Норма.

Попов, Лев Л. 2016. «Ключевые проблемы административного процесса». Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Право 4 (27): 171–185.

Разгулин, Сергей В. 2017. «Конституционный Суд РФ о взыскании налоговой задолженности». Налоговед 5: 62–71.

Суворова, Елена В. 2016. «Система досудебного урегулирования налоговых споров подтвердила свою эффективность». Налоговед 7: 10–27.

Шергин, Анатолий П. 1979. Административная юрисдикция. М.: Юридическая литература.

References

Karaseva (Sentsova), Marina V. 2017. “Grazhdansko-pravovye mery prinuzhdeniia v nalogovoi sfere i zashchita prav nalogoplatel’shchikov” [“Civil Law Means of Coercion in Tax Sector and Protection of Taxpayers’ Rights”]. Finansovoe pravo [Financial law] 10: 27–31.(In Russian)

Kononov, Pavel I. 2013. Osnovnye kategorii administrativnogo prava i protsessa. Monografiia [Main categories of administrative law and process. Monography]. Moscow: Jurlitinform. (In Russian)

Panova, Irina V. 2007. Administrativno-protsessual’noe pravo Rossii [Russian administrative process law. Moscow: Norma.(In Russian)

Popov, Lev L. 2016. “Kliuchevye problemy administrativnogo protsessa” [“The main problems of the administrative process”]. Vestnik of the Voronezh state university. Law 4 (27): 171–185.(In Russian)

Razgulin, Sergey V. 2017. “Konstitutsionnyi Sud RF o vzyskanii nalogovoi zadolzhennosti” [“The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation about the collecting of tax debts”]. Nalogoved 5: 62–71. (In Russian)

Shergin, Anatolii P. 1979. Administrativnaia iurisdiktsiia [Administrative Jurisdiction]. Moscow: Jurdicial literature.(In Russian)

Suvorova, Elena V. 2016. “Sistema dosudebnogo uregulirovaniia nalogovykh sporov podtverdila svoiu effektivnost’” [“The system of the pre-judicial settlement of the tax disputes proved its efficiency”]. Nalogoved 7: 10–27.(In Russian)

Published

2018-08-19

How to Cite

Кустова, М. В. (2018). Guarantees of taxpayers’ rights in the procedures of pre-judicial appeal: Consistence of legal positions. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 9(3), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.306

Issue

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research