Legal content of fraud in the field of consumer lending

Part two

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2025.106

Abstract

The article, based on an analysis of the practice of preliminary investigation and judicial practice that has developed in Russia in recent years in qualifying fraud in the field of consumer lending, substantiates the possibility of proving the status of injured citizens through a psychological and psychiatric examination that determines their mental state at the time of the commission of criminal acts against them. The role of proper qualification of fraud in the field of consumer credit is considered as a significant tool for stabilizing the functioning of financial markets in modern Russia. It is emphasized that it is the justified qualification of banks as financial victims as a result of fraud crimes, the purpose of which is the theft of funds from them, can become a significant factor in the active involvement of banks as professional participants in the financial market in actively combating this type of crime. The dynamics of law enforcement practice to protect the rights of victims of fraud in the field of consumer lending are characterized. It is shown that the key to the possibility of proper protection of their rights in court can only be the proper qualification of such crimes and the identification
of victims by the preliminary investigation authorities and courts. The most significant recent
step towards ensuring proper protection of the rights of victims of fraud crimes in the field of
consumer lending is characterized by a change, as a result of the efforts of the St. Petersburg
Prosecutor’s Office, in determining the circle of victims in criminal cases of fraud in the field of consumer lending. The necessity of adjusting the current judicial practice in the field of fraud in this area, which is developing in contradiction to the provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, is proved.

Keywords:

fraud, credit, victim, property damage, moral damage, onstitution, legality, corporation, unity of court, instrument for committing a crime

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Бархатова, Е. Н. 2013. «Особенности квалификации преступлений против собственности, совершаемых с применением гипноза к потерпевшему». Психопедагогика в правоохранительных органах 3: 60–62.

Гаджиев, Н. Г., О. В. Киселева, С. А. Коноваленко, О. В. Скрипкина. 2020. «Судебно-экономическая экспертиза мошенничества в кредитно-финансовой сфере». Вестник Астраханского государственного технологического университета. Сер.: Экономика 2: 89–99.

Головин, А. Ю., Е. В. Головина. 2021. «Социальная инженерия в механизме преступной деятельности в сфере информационно-коммуникационных технологий». Известия Тульского государственного университета. Юридические науки 2: 3–13.

Зорькин, В. Д. 2020. «Право будущего в эпоху цифр». Российская газета 16 апр., № 83 (8137).

Левитов, Н. Д. 1964. О психических состояниях человека. М.: Просвещение.

Машинникова, Н. О. 2018. «Понятие обмана в уголовном законодательстве России: сравнительно-правовой аспект». Вестник Удмуртского университета 28 (3): 428–436.

Оленников, С. М. 2018. «Соотношение гражданско-правового и уголовно-правового регулирования имущественных отношений на примере квалификации сделок, совершенных под влиянием обмана, насилия и угроз». Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право 3: 383–396. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.308

Петрякова, Л. А. 2021. «Юридический анализ составов мошенничества в банковской сфере». Сибирский юридический вестник 2 (93): 80–85.

Поймонова, Л. А. 2018. «Мошенничество в банковской сфере: понятие, признаки, виды». Сибирский юридический вестник 2 (81): 84–89.

Покровский, И. А. 1998. Основные проблемы гражданского права. М.: Статут.

Пристансков, В. Д. 2018. «Событие преступления как объект криминалистического познания». Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право 1: 78–90. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.106

Репецкая, А. Л., Л. А. Петрякова. 2022. «Криминологический анализ современного состояния мошенничества в банковской сфере России». Вестник Омского университета. Сер.: Право 1 (19): 62–72.

Смагоринский, Б. П., А. В. Сычева. 2014. «Типичные версии по делам о мошенничествах, совершенных в отношении социально незащищенных категорий граждан». Вестник Волгоградской Академии МВД России 1 (28): 6–15.

Тужилова-Орданская, Е. М., В. Е. Лукьяненко. 2019. «Конвалидизация недействительных сделок в российском праве». Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки 45: 519–539.

References

Barkhatova, E. N. 2013. “Features of the qualification of crimes against property committed with the use of hypnosis to the victim”. Psikhopedagogika v pravookhranitel’nykh organakh 3: 60–62. (In Russian)

Gadzhiev, N. G., O. V. Kiseleva, S. A. Konovalenko, O. V. Skripkina. 2020. “Forensic economic examination of fraud in the credit and financial sphere”. Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. Seriia: Ekonomika 2: 89–99. (In Russian)

Golovin, A. Yu., E. V. Golovina. 2021. “Social engineering in the mechanism of criminal activity in the field of information and communication technologies”. Izvestiia Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Iuridicheskie nauki 2: 3–13. (In Russian)

Levitov, N. D. 1964. On the mental states of a person. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ. (In Russian)

Mashinnikova, N. O. 2018. “The concept of deception in Russian criminal law: A comparative legal aspect”. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta 28 (3): 428–436. (In Russian)

Olennikov, S. M. 2018. “The ratio of civil and criminal law regulation of property relations on the example of qualification of transactions, made under the influence of deception, violence and threats”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 3: 383–396. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.308 (In Russian)

Petriakova, L. A. 2021. “Legal analysis of the composition of fraud in the banking sector”. Sibirskii iuridicheskii vestnik 2 (93): 80–85. (In Russian)

Poimonova, L. A. 2018. “Fraud in the banking sector: Concept, signs, types”. Sibirskii iuridicheskii vestnik 2 (81): 84–89. (In Russian)

Pokrovskii, I. A. 1998. Main problems of civil law. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Pristanskov, V. D. 2018. “The event of crime as object of criminalistic knowledge”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 1: 78–90. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.106 (In Russian)

Repetskaia, A. L., L. A. Petriakova. 2022. “A criminological analysis of the current state of fraud in the Russian banking sector”. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriia: Pravo 1 (19): 62–72. (In Russian)

Smagorinskii, B. P., A. V. Sycheva. 2014. “Typical versions of cases of fraud committed against socially vulnerable categories of citizens”. Vestnik Volgogradskoi akademii MVD Rossii 1 (28): 6–15. (In Russian)

Tuzhilova-Ordanskaia, E. M., V. E. Lukianenko. 2019. “Convalidation of invalid transactions in Russian law”. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Iuridicheskie nauki 45: 519–539. (In Russian)

Zorkin, V. D. 2020. “The law of the future in the age of numbers”. Rossiiskaia gazeta April 16, no. 83 (8137). (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2025-04-23

How to Cite

Pyatov , M. L., Kovalev, V. V., & Tatarenko, T. G. (2025). Legal content of fraud in the field of consumer lending: Part two. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 16(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2025.106

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025)

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.

Most read articles by the same author(s)