Защита кредиторов и эффективность механизма ответственности управляющих в условиях кризиса на предприятии: упущенные возможности в рамках реформы Рордорфа

Карло Аматуччи

doi:10.21638/11701/spbu14.2017.204

Authors

Карло Аматуччи University of Naples Federico II; Corso Umberto I, 40, 80138, Napoly, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2017.204

Abstract

The paper criticizes the fact that the last of several Italian insolvency law reforms exhibits an utter lack of demonstrated interest – a principle feature of any legislation that deals with the business crisis. The directors’ liability of insolvent companies has historically been one of the weakest points of Italian regulation for its very low enforceability. On the contrary, other EU jurisdictions (France and Spain) pay much attention to the efficacy of directors’ misconduct not only through specific forms of liabilities which make simpler the recovery of the damages caused to the company, but also through different and effective solutions (i. e., Disqualification) which impede wrongdoers from engaging in reckless behavior and wrongful conduct in future (UK, Ireland, Norway). The primacy of self-regulation in insolvency matters and the lack of adequate regulatory responses may go on to stimulate the efficiency and the integrity of Italian Insolvency system. Refs 8.

Keywords:

Insolvent companies, Directors’ liabilities, Italian reforms, Weak enforcement, Directors’ disqualification, Other EU Jurisdictions, UK Insolvency Service, Self-dealing rules, Integrity of the market

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References

Mazzoni A. La Responsabilità gestoria per scorretto esercizio dell’impresa priva della prospettiva di continuità aziendale [Management responsibility for misuse of company operations without the prospect of continuity in governance in company law]. Amministrazione e controllo nel diritto delle società. Liber Amicorum Antonio Piras. Giappichelli [Administration and control in the company law. Liber Amicorum Antonio Piras]. Torino, 2010.(In Italian)

Brizzi F. Doveri degli amministratori e tutela dei creditori nel diritto societario della crisi [Duties of Directors and creditor protection in company law]. Giappichelli. Torino, 2014, vol. I.(In Italian)

Sacchi R. La responsabilità gestionale nella crisi dell’impresa societaria [The management responsibility in the crisis of companies]. Giurisprudenza commerciale [Commercial Law]. 2014, vol. I.(In Italian)

Directors’ duties and liabilities. London, School of Economics, 2013.

Hodges Ch. Law and Corporate Behaviour. Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2015.

Jorio A. La riforma fallimentare: pregi e difetti delle nuove regole [Bankruptcy reform: pros and cons of the new rules]. Giurisprudenza commerciale [Commercial Law]. 2013, vol. I.(In Italian)

Rossi G. I diritti dei cittadini fra le crisi dell’impresa e della giustizia [Citizens’ rights among the company’s crisis and justice]. Rivista delle società [Social Review]. 2014, vol. I. (In Italian)

Rossi A. Le proposte “indecenti” nel concordato preventivo [The “indecent” proposal in the rescue procedures]. Giurisprudenza commerciale [Commercial Law]. 2015, vol. I.(In Italian)