Maxima jura novit curia and the non liquet prohibition: Problems of understanding and application in civil proceedings

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.312

Abstract

The article analyzes the traditional understanding in Russian civil procedure of the content of the maxim jura novit curia and the prohibition of non liquet, as well as their manifestation in contemporary Russian civil process. It is argued that the maxim jura novit curia and the prohibition of non liquet are in effect, manifesting in the court’s duty to apply the analogy of the law or the analogy of the right and resolve the issue before the court on its merits, even in the absence of norms directly regulating the disputed legal relationship. The competitive advantage of the Russian judicial process is identified, which lies in the ability to use the institutions of the analogy of the law and the analogy of the right to fill the absence of norms not only of substantive but also procedural law. The evolution of civil procedural legislation norms regarding the indexation of awarded sums and the influence of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation’s acts on this evolution are analyzed. The causes of errors in the understanding and application of the maxim jura novit curia and the prohibition of non liquet, made
by ordinary courts when considering applications for the indexation of awarded sums, leading to the repeated necessity to invoke the mechanism of constitutional justice, are identified. It is concluded that the court has no right to refuse to satisfy a claim solely on the grounds of the absence of appropriate legal regulation, uncertainty, or gaps in the applicable law, and that avoiding the application of analogy when it is necessary to resolve the issue before the court should be regarded as a violation of substantive or procedural law norms. The article proposes the direct enshrinement of the status of acts of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation as sources (forms) of law and a detailed definition of the procedure for their application by ordinary courts in the text of the procedural law.

Keywords:

civil procedure, arbitration process, civil process, jura novit curia, non liquet, purpose of justice, duty of the court, indexation of the amounts awarded

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Алексеев, Сергей С. 1982. Общая теория права. В 2 т. Т. 2. М.: Юрид. лит.

Арсланов, Камиль М., Дамир Х. Валеев, Ринат М. Гимазов. 2010. Арбитражный процесс. Отв. ред. Дамир Х. Валеев, Михаил Ю. Челышев. М.: Статут.

Васьковский, Евгений В. 1913. Курс гражданского процесса. Т. 1: Субъекты и объекты процесса, процессуальные отношения и действия. М.: Изд. Бр. Башмаковых.

Васьковский, Евгений В. 1914. Учебник гражданского процесса. М.: Изд. Бр. Башмаковых.

Воронцова, Ирина В. 2012. «Постановления Пленума ВС РФ и их влияние на российское гражданское судопроизводство». Вестник гражданского процесса 4: 68–99.

Гордон, Владимир М. 1902. Основание иска в составе изменения исковых требований. Ярославль: Тип. Губ. правл.

Загайнова, Светлана К. 2007 «О требованиях, предъявляемых к судебному решению в гражданском и арбитражном процессе». Закон 11: 51–61.

Комаров, Вячеслав В., ред. 2011. Курс цивiльного процессу. Харьков: Право.

Малышев, Кронид. 1875. Курс гражданского судопроизводства. Т. 2. СПб.: Тип. М. М. Стасюлевича.

Микрюков, Виктор А. 2016. «Аналогия закона и аналогия права в позициях высших судов Российской Федерации». Современное право 11: 53–57.

Носенко, Марина С. 2010. «Применение процессуальной аналогии арбитражными судами». Арбитражный и гражданский процесс 8: 46–48.

Самсонов, Николай В. 2017. «Цели и задачи цивилистического процесса». Современное право 11: 68–75.

Самсонов, Николай В. 2020. «Типология административного судопроизводства и пути унификации цивилистического процесса». Вестник гражданского процесса 5: 118–133.

Сергеев, Александр П. 2011. Гражданское право. В 3 т. Т. 1. М.: Пресс.

Терентьева, Людмила В. 2018. «Общеправовая презумпция jura novit curia и отраслевая презумпция jura aliena novit curia международного гражданского процесса». Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики 3: 195–213.

Шиндяпина, Елена Д., Светлана В. Бошно. 2006. «Соотношение аналогии права и аналогии закона». Юрист 7: 6–10.

References

Alekseev, Sergei S. 1982. General theory of law. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow, Iuridicheskaia literatura Publ. (In Russian)

Arslanov, Kamil’ M., Damir Kh. Valeev, Rinat M. Gimazov. 2010. Arbitration process. Eds Damir Kh. Valeev, Mikhail Iu. Chelyshev. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Gordon, Vladimir M. 1902 Foundation of a claim as part of a change in claims. Yaroslavl, Tipografiia gubernskogo pravleniia Publ. (In Russian)

Komarov, V’iacheslav V., ed. 2011. The course of the civil process. Kharkiv, Pravo Publ. (In Ukrainian)

Malyshev, Kronid. 1875. A course in civil litigation. Vol. 2. S. Petersburg, Tipografiia M. M. Stasiulevicha Publ. (In Russian)

Mikriukov, Viktor A. 2016. “The analogy of law and the analogy of law in the positions of the Supreme Courts of the Russian Federation”. Sovremennoe pravo 11: 53–57. (In Russian)

Nosenko, Marina S. 2010. “Application of the procedural analogy by arbitration courts”. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess 8: 46–48. (In Russian)

Samsonov, Nikolai V. 2017. “Goals and objectives of the civil process”. Sovremennoe pravo 11: 68–75. (In Russian)

Samsonov, Nikolai V. 2020. “Typology of administrative proceedings and ways of unifying the civil process”. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa 10 (5): 118–133. (In Russian)

Sergeev, Aleksandr P. 2011. Civil Law. In 3 vols, vol 3. Moscow, Press Publ. (In Russian)

Shindiapina, Elena D., Svetlana V. Boshno. 2006. “Correlation between analogy of law and analogy of law”. Iurist 7: 6–10. (In Russian)

Terent’eva, Liudmila V. 2018. “General legal presumption of jura novit curia and sectoral presumption of jura aliena novit curia of international civil procedure”. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki 3: 195–213. (In Russian)

Vas’kovskii, Evgenii V. 1913. Course of civil procedure. Vol. 1: Subjects and objects of the process, procedural relations and actions. Moscow, Izdanie Br. Bashmakovykh Publ. (In Russian)

Vas’kovskii, Evgenii V. 1914. Textbook of civil procedure. Moscow, Izdanie Br. Bashmakovykh Publ. (In Russian)

Vorontsova, Irina V. 2012. “Resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and their impact on Russian civil litigation». Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa 4: 68–99. (In Russian)

Zagainova, Svetlana K. 2007. “On the requirements for a court decision in civil and arbitration proceedings”. Zakon 11: 51–61. (In Russian)

Published

2024-10-14

How to Cite

Samsonov, N. V. (2024). Maxima jura novit curia and the non liquet prohibition: Problems of understanding and application in civil proceedings. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 15(3), 724–735. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.312

Issue

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research