Comparative civil procedure: Teaching experience at Moscow State and Saint Petersburg State Universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.209Abstract
There is a large variety of legal and procedural systems. According to the classical point of view, there are three dominant legal systems: civil law, common law and mixed jurisdictions. While the distinction between the systems is not as strong today as it has been in previous centuries, it still exists, along with the controversial features that are associated with each tradition. The distinctions between the three systems are following: civil juries, pre-trial conferences, judicial precedents, active judge, class actions, notary, legal education, etc. All these features are discussed in the course “Comparative civil procedure”, that is read at Moscow and Saint-Petersburg universities. Today, as a global, unified approach to civil procedure is being developed, comparative civil procedure becomes important in contemporary word. This article is devoted to the historical analysis of the teaching experience of comparative civil procedure at Moscow and Saint-Petersburg universities. It concerns not only contemporary period, but also history in the pre-revolutionary (1917) and Soviet periods.
Keywords:
сomparative civil procedure, civil justice, teaching civil procedure, legal education
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Библиография
Авдюков, Михаил Г., Клейнман, Александр Ф., Треушников, Михаил К. 1978. Основные черты буржуазного гражданского процессуального права. М.: Издательство МГУ.
Брановицкий, Константин Л., Котельников, Андрей Г., Решетникова, Ирина В. 2013. Гражданское судопроизводство за рубежом. М.: Инфотропик.
Васильев, Иларион В. 1827. Исторический взгляд на правежи в России. Труды и летописи Общества истории и древностей российских. Ч. 3. Кн. 2. М.
Васьковский, Евгений В. 2003. Учебник гражданского права. М.: Статут.
Гамбаров, Юрий С. 1896. Гражданский процесс. М.: Литография Ф. Л. Шмидекке.
Давтян, Ани Г. (Ред.) 2008. Гражданский процесс зарубежных стран. М.
Долова, Мария. 2017. «Развитие науки гражданского процессуального права». Дис. … канд. юрид.наук. Московский государственный университет.
Дыновский, Конрад К. 1896. Задачи цивилистического образования и значение его для гражданского правосудия. Одесса: Славянская типография Н. Хрисогелосa.
Елисеев, Николай Г. 2004. Гражданское процессуальное право зарубежных стран. М.: Проспект.
Жиди, Антонио. 2013. «Кодекс группового судопроизводства: модель для стран континентального права». Закон 11: 151–163.
Кейлин, Александр Д. 1950. Судоустройство и гражданский процесс капиталистических государств. Ч. 1. М.: Внешторгиздат.
Кейлин, Александр Д. 1958. Судоустройство и гражданский процесс капиталистических государств. Ч. 2. М.: Внешторгиздат.
Ленин, Владимир И. 1970. Полн. собр. соч. Т. 44. М.: Издательство политической литературы.
Малешин, Дмитрий Я. 2017. Сравнительный гражданский процесс: учеб.-метод. комплекс. М.: Статут.
Малышев, Кронид И. 1876. Курс гражданского судопроизводства. Т. 1. СПб.: типография М. М. Стасюлевича.
Марченко, Михаил Н. 2002. Курс сравнительного правоведения. М.: Городец.
Михайлов, М. 1848. История образования и развития системы русского гражданского судопроизводства до Уложения 1649 года. СПб.: Типография Карла Крайя.
Монтескье, Шарль Л. 1999. О Духе законов. Пер. А. Матешук. М.: Мысль.
Нефедьев, Евгений А. 2005. Избранные труды по гражданскому процессу. Краснодар: Сов. Кубань.
Парфенчикова, Анастасия А. (Пер. с англ. и коммент.) 2016. Глобальный кодекс принудительного исполнения. М.: Статут.
Пучинский, Василий К. 1974. Английский гражданский процесс. М.: Издательство УДН.
Пучинский, Василий К. 1979. Гражданский процесс США. М.: Наука.
Пучинский, Василий К. 1989. Принципы буржуазного гражданского процессуального права. М.: УДН.
Пучинский, Василий К. 1991. Участники буржуазного гражданского процесса. Англия, США, Франция. М.: Издательство УДН.
Томсинов, Владимир А. (Ред.) 2011. История юридического факультета Московского университета(1755–2010). М.
Томсинов, Владимир А. 2015. «Первый профессор юридического факультета Московского университета Филипп-Генрих Дильтей (1723–1781)». Вестник МГУ. Серия 11 «Право» 2: 3–21.
Суханов, Евгений А. (сост.). 2017. Университетский вопрос в России. М.: Статут.
Щегловитов, Иван Г. 1915. Влияние иностранных законодательств на составление судебных уставов 20 ноября 1864 г. Пг.: Издание Товарищества И. Д. Сытина.
Chase, Oscar G. 2002. “American ‘Exceptionalism’ and Comparative Procedure”. The American Journal of Comparative Law vol. L, no. 2: 287–301.
Chase, Oscar and Helen Hershkoff (Eds.). 2007. Civil Litigation in Comparative Context. New York.
Clermont, Kevin. 2006. “Integrating Transnational Perspectives into Civil Procedure: What Not to Teach”.Journal of Legal Education 56: 524–538.
Ghanbari, N., and Mohseni, H., Nassiran, D. 2016. “Comparative Study of Civil Procedure in Common Law and Civil Law Systems”. Journal of Politics and Law vol. 5, no. 5: 267–282.
Gidi, Antonio. 2003. “Class Actions in Brazil — a Model for Civil Law Countries”. American Journal of Comparative Law vol. LI: 21–56.
Gidi, Antonio. 2006. “Teaching Comparative Civil Procedure”. Journal of Legal Education vol. 56, no 4: 502–509.
Gottwald, Peter. 2005. “Comparative Civil Procedure”. Ritsumeikan Law Review 22: 23–35.
Hazeltine, H. 1928. “Comparative Studies in the History of Civil Procedure”. Journal of Society of Public Teachers of Law 12: 12–22.
Jacoby, S. 1976. “The Use of Comparative Law in Teaching American Civil Procedure”. Cleveland State Law Review 25: 423–433.
Jolowicz, John. 1988. “Comparative Law and the Reform of Civil Procedure”. Legal Studies 8: 3–29.
Le Paulle, P. 1926–1927. “Study in Comparative Civil Procedure”. The Cornell Law Quarterly 12: 24–48.
Merryman, John H. 1985. The Civil Law Tradition. An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Perlingeiro, R. 2016. “Contemporary Challenges in Latin American Administrative Justice”. 3 BRICS Law Journal 2: 21–56.
Storme, Marcel. (Ed.). 1994. Approximation of Judiciary Law in the European Union. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Storme, Marcel. 2005. “Single Civil Procedure for Europe: A Cathedral Builders’s Dream”. Ritsumeikan Law Review 5: 87–100.
Van Rhee, Remco С. Н. 2000. “Civil Procedure: A European Ius Commune?” European Review of Private Law 4: 589–611.
References
Avdukov, Michael, Alexander Kleinman, Mikhail Treushnikov. 1978. Osnovnye cherty burzhuaznogo grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava [The Main Features of the Bourgeois Civil Procedural Law]. Moscow: MGU.(In Russian)
Branovitsky, Konstantin, Andrej Kotelnikov, Irina Reshetnikova. 2013. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo zarubezhom [Civil Litigation Abroad]. Moscow: Infotropik.(In Russian)
Chase, Oscar G. 2002. “American ‘Exceptionalism’ and Comparative Procedure”. The American Journal of Comparative Law vol. L, 2: 287–301.
Chase, Oscar, and Hershkoff, Helen (Eds.). 2007. Civil Litigation in Comparative Context. New York.
Clermont, Kevin. 2006. “Integrating Transnational Perspectives into Civil Procedure: What Not to Teach”. Journal of Legal Education 56: 524–538.
Davtyan, Ani. (ed.) 2008. Grazhdanskii protsess zarubezhnykh stran [The Civil Process in Foreign Countries]. Moscow.(In Russian)
Dolova, Maria. 2017. “Razvitie nauki grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava”. Dis. kand. iurid. nauk. Moskovskii gosudarstvennyi universitet [“Science of Civil Procedure Law”. PhD dissertation, Moscow State University].(In Russian)
Dunovsky, Konrad. 1896. Zadachi tsivilisticheskogo obrazovaniia i znachenie ego dlia grazhdanskogo pravosudiia [The Tasks of Civil Education and its significance for Civil Justice]. Odessa: Slavic typography by N. Hrisogelos.(In Russian)
Eliseev, Nikolay. 2004. Grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravo zarubezhnykh stran [Civil Procedure Law of Foreign Countries]. Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russian)
Gambarov, Yuri. 1896. Grazhdanskii protsess [Civil Process]. Moscow: Lithography F. L. Shmidekke.(In Russian)
Ghanbari, N., and Mohseni, H., Nassiran, D. 2016. “Comparative Study of Civil Procedure in Common Law and Civil Law Systems”. Journal of Politics and Law vol. 5, 5: 267–282.
Gidi, Antonio. 2003. “Class Actions in Brazil — a Model for Civil Law Countries”. American Journal of Comparative Law vol. LI: 21–56.
Gidi, Antonio. 2006. “Teaching Comparative Civil Procedure”. Journal of Legal Education vol. 56, 4: 502–509.
Gottwald, Peter. 2005. “Comparative Civil Procedure”. Ritsumeikan Law Review 22: 23–35.
Hazeltine, H. 1928. “Comparative Studies in the History of Civil Procedure”. Journal of Society of Public Teachers of Law 12: 12–22.
Jacoby, S. 1976. “The Use of Comparative Law in Teaching American Civil Procedure”. Cleveland State Law Review 25: 423–433.
Jolowicz, John. 1988. “Comparative Law and the Reform of Civil Procedure”. Legal Studies 8: 3–29.
Keilin, Alexander. 1950. Sudoustroistvo i grazhdanskii protsess kapitalisticheskikh gosudarstv [Judicial System and Civil Process of Capitalist States]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Vneshtorgizdat. (In Russian)
Keilin, Alexander. 1958. Sudoustroistvo i grazhdanskii protsess kapitalisticheskikh gosudarstv [Judicial System and Civil Process of Capitalist States]. Vol. 2. Moscow: Vneshtorgizdat.(In Russian)
Le Paulle, P. 1926–1927. “Study in Comparative Civil Procedure”. The Cornell Law Quarterly 12: 24–48.
Lenin, Vladimir. 1970. Poln. sobr. soch [Full Collection of Studies]. Vol. 44. Moscow: Political Literature.(In Russian)
Maleshin, Dmitry I. 2017. Sravnitel’nyi grazhdanskii protsess: ucheb.-metod. kompleks [Comparative Civil Procedure. Educational and Methodical Complex]. Moscow: Statute. (In Russian)
Malyshev, Cronid. 1876. Kurs grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [The Course of Civil Proceedings]. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Typography by M. Stasjulevich.(In Russian)
Marchenko, Mikhail. 2002. Kurs sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniia [A Course of Comparative Law]. Moscow: Gorodets.(In Russian)
Merryman, John H. 1985. The Civil Law Tradition. An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mikhailov, M. 1848. Istoriia obrazovaniia i razvitiia sistemy russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva do Ulozheniia 1649 goda [History of the Formation and Development of the System of Russian Civil Proceedings up to the Code of 1649]. St. Petersburg: Printing house of Karl Kraj.
Montesquieu, Charles. 1999. O Dukhe zakonov [The Spirit of Laws]. Translated by A. Mateshuk. Moscow: Mysl.(In Russian)
Nefedev, Eugene. 2005. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu protsessu [Selected Works on Civil Process]. Krasnodar: Soviet Kuban.(In Russian)
Parfenchikova, Anastasiya (translation from English and comment). 2016. Global’nyi kodeks prinuditel’nogo ispolneniia [The Global Code Enforcement]. Moscow: Statute.(In Russian)
Perlingeiro, R. 2016. “Contemporary Challenges in Latin American Administrative Justice”. 3 BRICS Law Journal 2: 21–56.
Puchinskij, Vassily. 1974. Angliiskii grazhdanskii protsess [English Civil Procedure]. Moscow: UDN.(In Russian)
Puchinskij, Vassily. 1979. Grazhdanskii protsess SShA [United States Civil Litigation]. Moscow: Nauka.(In Russian)
Puchinskij, Vassily. 1989. Printsipy burzhuaznogo grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava [Principles of Bourgeois Law of Civil Procedure]. Moscow: UDN.(In Russian)
Puchinskij, Vassily. 1991. Uchastniki burzhuaznogo grazhdanskogo protsessa. Angliia, SShA, Frantsiia [The Participants of the Bourgeois Civil Process. England, United States, France]. Moscow: UDN.(In Russian)
Shcheglovitov, Ivan. 1915. Vliianie inostrannykh zakonodatel’stv na sostavlenie sudebnykh ustavov 20 noiabria 1864 g. [Impact of Foreign Laws on the Drafting of Court Charters 20 November 1864]. St. Petersburg: Edition by Podgornyy Sytin Partnership.(In Russian)
Storme, Marcel. (Ed.). 1994. Approximation of Judiciary Law in the European Union. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Storme, Marcel. 2005. “Single Civil Procedure for Europe: A Cathedral Builders’s Dream”. Ritsumeikan Law Review 5: 87–100.
Sukhanov, Yevgeny. (compilers). 2017. Universitetskii vopros v Rossii [The University Question in Russia]. Moscow: Statute.(In Russian)
Tomsinov, Vladimir (ed.). 2011. Istoriia iuridicheskogo fakul’teta Moskovskogo universiteta (1755–2010)[History of the Law Faculty of the Moscow University (1755–2010)]. Moscow.(In Russian)
Tomsinov, Vladimir. 2015. “Pervyi professor iuridicheskogo fakul’teta Moskovskogo universiteta Filipp-Genrikh Dil’tei (1723–1781)” [“The First Professor of the Law Faculty of the Moscow University Philip Heinrich Diltej (1723–1781)”]. Vestnik of Moscow State University. A series of “Law”, 11 (2): 3–21.(In Russian)
Van Rhee, Remco С. Н. 2000. “Civil Procedure: A European Ius Commune?” European Review of Private Law 4: 589–611.
Vasilev, Hilarion. 1827. Istoricheskii vzgliad na pravezhi v Rossii [Historical View on the “Pravezhi” in Russia]. Trudy i letopisi Obshchestva istorii i drevnostei rossiiskikh [Papers and Annals of Russian Society of History and Antiquities, Ch. 3. Book 2]. Moscow.(In Russian)
Vaskovsky, Eugene. 2003. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo prava [Civil Law Textbook]. Moscow: Statute.(In Russian)
Zhidi, Antonio. 2013. “Kodeks gruppovogo sudoproizvodstva: model’ dlia stran kontinental’nogo prava”[“Code of the Group Proceedings: a Model for Civil Law”]. Zakon [Law] 11: 151–163.(In Russian)
Downloads
Published
2018-06-15
How to Cite
Малешин, Д. Я. (2018). Comparative civil procedure: Teaching experience at Moscow State and Saint Petersburg State Universities. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 9(2), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.209
Issue
Section
Legal Life: Scientific-Practical Conclusions, Comments and Reviews
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
