The ratio decidendi of the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia from the perspective of legal positivism

Authors

  • Rumawi Rumawi Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-2222
  • Mohammad Ali Universitas Brawijaya
  • Abdul Syakur Universitas PGRI Delta Sidoarjo
  • Supianto Supianto Universitas Islam Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.211

Abstract

Indonesia is currently facing economic problems related to the lack of investment and lack of job opportunities, as well as the difficulty of licensing. Therefore, the preparation of laws and regulations using the omnibus law method was then carried out to overcome these conditions so that Indonesia succeeded in issuing Law Nо. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation. Even though the existence of the Law is critical because of the various shortcomings in it, ranging
from the mechanism for its preparation, the involvement of the parties, excessive (over
regulation) to the level of norms which experts and legal observers feel need a more in-depth study. Based on this fact, the question then arises: What is the ratio decidendi of the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Nо. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020? And is the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Nо. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 in accordance with the perspective of legal positivism? The method in this manuscript uses normative legal research. Based on the analysis, Law No. 11 of 2020 was decided as conditionally unconstitutional. So that the legislators need to improve no less than two years
since the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Nо. 91/PUUXVIII/2020 was pronounced. So that Law Nо. 11 of 2020 in the context of legal positivism can also be said to be contrary to the constitution and declared to have no legal consequences.

Keywords:

Ratio Decidendi, Constitutional Court, Legal Positivism, decision, Constitution of Indonesia, unconstitutional law, normative legal research

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

References

Anggono, Bayu D. 2014. Perkembangan pembentukan undang-undang di Indonesia. Jakarta, Konstitusi Press. (In Indonesian)

Anggono, Bayu D. 2020a. Pokok-Pokok Pemikiran Penataan Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Jakarta, Konstitusi Press. (In Indonesian)

Anggono, Bayu D. 2020b. “Omnibus Law Sebagai Teknik Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Peluang Adopsi dan Tantangannya dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia”. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 9 (1): 17–37. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i1.389 (In Indonesian)

Anshori, Abdul G. 2016. Filsafat Hukum. Yogyakarta, Gadjah Mada University Press. (In Indonesian)

Arief, Anggraeny, Rizki Ramadani. 2021. “Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja dan Implikasinya Terhadap Konsep Dasar Perseroan Terbatas”. Jurnal Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik Islam 6 (2): 106–120. (In Indonesian)

Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2014. Perihal Undang-Undang. Jakarta, Rajawali Pers. (In Indonesian)

Attamimi, Abdul H. S. 1992. “Teori Perundang-Undangan Indonesia Suatu Sisi Ilmu Pengetahuan Perundang-undangan Indonesia yang Menjelaskan dan Menjernihkan Pemahaman”. Upacara Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar tetap pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta. (In Indonesian)

Aziz, Muhammad F., Nunuk Febriananingsih. 2020. “Mewujudkan Perseroan Terbatas (Pt) Perseorangan Bagi Usaha Mikro Kecil (Umk) Melalui Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Cipta Kerja”. Rechts Vinding 9 (1): 91–108. (In Indonesian)

Cahyadi, Antonius, Fernando. M. Manullang. 2015. Pengantar ke Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group. (In Indonesian)

Chaidir, Ellydar, Sudi Fahmi. 2010. Hukum perbandingan konstitusi. Yogyakarta, Total Media. (In Indonesian)

Darmodiharjo, Darji, Sidarta Sidarta. 2006. Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. (In Indonesian)

Efendi, A’an, Dyah O. Susanti, Nuzulia K. Sari. 2018. Pengantar Filsafat Hukum. Jember, Jember University Press. (In Indonesian)

Ekatjahjana, Widodo. 2015. Negara Hukum, Konstitusi, dan Demokrasi: Dinamika dalam PenyelenggaranSistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Jember, Jember University Press. (In Indonesian)

Erwin, Muhammad. 2018. Filsafat Hukum Refleksi Kritis Terhadap Hukum dan hukum Indonesia (dalam Dimensi Ide dan Aplikasi) . Jakarta, Rajawali Pers. (In Indonesian)

Garner, Bryan A., ed. 2010. Black’s law dictionary. 9th ed., abridged. St. Paul, West Publ. Huijbers, Theo. 1995. Filsafat Hukum. Yogyakarta, PT Kanisius. (In Indonesian)

Indrati, Maria F. 2007. “Meningkatkan Kualitas Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia”. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 4 (2): 18–28. (In Indonesian)

Manullang, Fernando M. 2020. Legisme, Legalitas, Dan Kepastian Hukum. Jakarata, Prenadamedia Group. (In Indonesian)

Marzuki, Peter M. 2010. Penelitian Hukum (Cet. ke‑6) . Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group. (In Indonesian)

Natabaya, Haji A. S. 2008. Sistem peraturan perundang-undangan Indonesia (cet. ke‑2) . Jakarta, Konstitusi Press, Tatanusa. (In Indonesian)

Rasjidi, Lili, Liza S. Rasjidi. 2012. Dasar-Dasar Filsafat dan Teori Hukum. Bandung, PT Citra Aditya Bakti. (In Indonesian)

Rato, Dominikus. 2014. Filsafat Hukum Suatu Pengantar Mencari, Menemukan, dan Memahami Hukum. Surabaya, Laks Bang Justitia. (In Indonesian)

Safa’at, M. Ali, Agus Riewanto, Pan Mohammad Faiz, Abdul Ghoffar, Andriani W. Novitasari, Sunny Ummul Firdaus, Bayu Dwi Anggono, Bisariyadi, Helmi Kasim, dan Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono. 2019. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi: revisi. Jakarta, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan, Mahkamah Konstitusi. (In Indonesian)

Susanti, Dyah O., A’an Efendi. 2014. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta, Sinar Grafika. (In Indonesian)

Syahrizal, Ahmad. 2006. Peradilan Konstitusi: Suatu Studi tentang Adjudikasi Konstitusional Sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Normatif. Jakarta, PT Pradnya Paramita. (In Indonesian)

Wirawan, Tjuk, Totok Sudaryanto, Ida B. O. Ana. 2002. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Diktat pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember). Jember, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember. (In Indonesian)

Downloads

Published

2024-08-07

How to Cite

Rumawi, R., Ali, M., Syakur, A., & Supianto, S. (2024). The ratio decidendi of the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia from the perspective of legal positivism. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 15(2), 483–492. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.211

Issue

Section

Foreign and International Law