Разъяснение участникам уголовного судопроизводства целей следственных действий как необходимое условие реализации их прав и законных интересов

Александр Иванович Баянов

doi:10.21638/11701/spbu14.2017.404

Authors

Александр Иванович Баянов Siberian State University, 79, pr. Svobodny, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2017.404

Abstract

The Code of Criminal Procedure, art. 170, part. 4 requires the investigator to clarify the purpose of the investigative action to witnesses prior to its production. To other participants the purpose of the pre-trial investigation may not be explained. This provision does not comply with part. 1, art. 11 of the Code of Criminal Procedure that all participants in the criminal justice process are due full enjoyment of rights. The purpose is the fundamental legal consolidation, ensuring the achievement of the result of the investigative action. Understanding of the purpose of the investigative action establishes conditions for the exercise of rights and legitimate interests for each its participants. In the process of production of the pre-trial investigation action and after its conclusion each participant is given the opportunity to judge whether the process has or has not complied with their rights and legitimate interests by comparing the achieved result with the claimed purpose. Without a clear understanding of the purpose of the investigative steps this possibility becomes a mere formality. In this regard it is proposed to make additions in the texts of articles 164 and 166 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, providing for the need to clarify the purpose of the investigative action to all its participants. Refs 8.

Keywords:

investigative action, participants of the investigative action, legal rights and legal interests of participants of the investigative action, the purpose of the investigative action, a proceeding order of investigative action, common rules of proceeding of investigative action

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Барабаш А.С., Дробышевский С.А. О специфике принципов уголовного процесса // Правовая политика и правовая жизнь. 2012. № 2. С. 63–71.

Шафиров В.М. Проблемы пробелов в праве и современное (интегративное) правопонимание // Российское правосудие. 2012. № 10. С. 5–18.

Большой толковый словарь русского языка / сост. и гл. ред. С. А. Кузнецов. СПб.: Норинт, 1998.1536 с.

Шейфер С.А. Собирание доказательств в советском уголовном процессе: методологические и правовые проблемы. Саратов: изд. Саратовского ун-та, 1986. 171 с.

Шейфер С.А. Следственные действия. Система и процессуальная форма. М.: Юрид. лит., 1981.128 с.

Новиков С.А. Показания обвиняемого в современном уголовном процессе России. СПб.: Издательский дом С.-Петерб. гос. ун-та, Изд-во Юридического факультета С.-Петерб. гос. ун-та, 2004.240 с.

Ломов Б.Ф. Методологические и теоретические проблемы психологии. М.: Наука, 1984. 444 с.

Шейфер С.А. Доказательство и доказывание по уголовным делам: проблемы теории и правового регулирования. М.: Норма: ИНФРА, 2012. 240 с.

References

Barabash A.S., Drobyshevskii S.A. O spetsifike printsipov ugolovnogo protsessa [Specifics of the criminal procedural principles].Pravovaia politika i pravovaia zhizn’ [Legal Policy and Legal Life]. 2012, no. 2, pp. 63–71. (In Russian)

Shafirov V.M. Problemy probelov v prave i sovremennoe (integrativnoe) pravoponimanie [Problems of gaps in the law and modern (integrative) law thinking]. Rossiiskoe pravosudie [Russian Administration of Justice], 2012, no. 10, pp. 5–18. (In Russian)

Bol’shoi tolkovyi slovar’ russkogo iazyka [A large dictionary of Russian language]. Сompiler and Chief editor. S. Kuznetsov. St. Petersburg, Norint Publ., 1998. 1536 p. (In Russian)

Sheifer S.A. Sobiranie dokazatel’stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse: metodologicheskie i pravovye problemy [Collection of evidence in the Soviet criminal proceedings: methodological and legal issues]. Saratov, Saratov University Publ., 1986. 171 p. (In Russian)

Sheifer S.A. Sledstvennye deistviia. Sistema i protsessual’naia forma [Investigative Actions. System and Procedural Form]. Moscow, Law Books Publ., 1981. 128 p. (In Russian)

Novikov S.A. Pokazaniia obviniaemogo v sovremennom ugolovnom protsesse Rossii [Testimonies in actual criminal procedure in Russia]. St. Petersburg, Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University, Law Faculty of Saint Petersburg State University, 2004. 240 p. (In Russian)

Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psikhologii [Methodological and theoretical problems of Psychology]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984. 444 p. (In Russian)

Sheifer S.A. Dokazatel’stvo i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniia [Proof and Evidence in Criminal Cases: Theory and Problems of Legal Regulation]. Moscow, NORMA: INFRA-M Publ., 2012. 240 p. (In Russian)