Actual practice of linguist expert within the speech offenses: Relevance and problems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.116

Abstract

This article raises the problem of the uncertainty of legal norms related to speech offenses, which can be traced, in particular, in Art. 5.61 “Insult” of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation in relation to the concepts of a generalized negative assessment and indecent form of expression. The author believes that the adoption of a new wording of the plot of this article did not eliminate the existing uncertainty, on the contrary, new, even more uncertain elements led to the danger of an arbitrary broad interpretation of this legal norm and equally arbitrary judicial decisions in cases of insult. The article emphasizes that under such conditions, linguistic expertise becomes of particular importance as an important way to establish the essential signs of insult. However, despite the fact that, in relation to the le gal sphere, one can quite confidently speak of the already established institution of linguistic expertise, nevertheless, in cases involving personal insults, linguistic experts continue to face a number of problems. Difficulties are associated with the assessment of a particular word as subject to the disposition of an insult, with the definition of decency/indecency of a linguistic form of expression, with the inability to codify the norms of morality and morality, with the use of various linguistic approaches by experts, as a result of which many questions remain debatable. Examples of such situations are also given in the article. According to the author, the legislator should clearly define the conceptual content of all components of the objective side of offenses related to personal insult, at the same time, professional linguists should develop a common understanding and a common strategy in solving these problems. This article is an attempt to take a step in this direction.

 

Keywords:

speech offenses, linguistic expertise, insult, personality assessment, indecent form of expression of personality assessment, profanity, other form of expression of personality assessment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Акинина, Анастасия. 2020a. «“Иди на х…!”: оскорбление или нет?». Лингэксперт. Лингвистические экспертизы для бизнеса и частных лиц. Дата обращения 24 июля, 2021. https://akinina-lingexpert.ru/idi-na-h-oskorblenie-ili-net.

Акинина, Анастасия. 2020b. «“Иди на х…!”: оскорбление или нет?». Правдоруб: профессиональное сообщество юристов и адвокатов. Дата обращения 24 июля, 2021. https://user239811.pravorub.ru/personal/95184.html.

Баранов, Анатолий Н. 2007. Лингвистическая экспертиза текста. Теория и практика. М.: Флинта; Наука.

Бельчиков, Юлий А., Михаил В. Горбаневский, Игорь В. Жарков. 2010. Методические рекомендации по вопросам лингвистической экспертизы спорных текстов СМИ. Сб. материалов. М.: Информкнига.

Галяшина, Елена И. 2020. Судебное речеведение. М.: Норма.

Горбаневский, Михаил В., ред. 2006. Как провести лингвистическую экспертизу спорного текста? Памятка для судей, юристов СМИ, адвокатов, прокуроров, следователей, дознавателей и экспертов. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: Юридический мир.

Евгеньева, Анастасия П., ред. 1999. Словарь русского языка. В 4 т., 4-е изд. М.: Русский язык; Полиграфресурсы. Дата обращения 24 июля, 2021. http://feb-web.ru/feb/mas/mas-abc/09/ma166834.htm?cmd=0&istext=1.

Изотова, Тамара М., Виталий О. Кузнецов, Анна М. Плотникова. 2016. Судебная лингвистическая экспертиза по делам об оскорблении. М.: Российский федеральный центр судебной экспертизы.

Ильясов, Фархад Н., ред. 1994. Русский мат (Антология). М.: Издательский дом Лада М. Дата обращения 24 июля, 2021. https://facetia.ru/node/4349.

Стернин, Иосиф А., Любовь Г. Антонова, Дмитрий Л. Карпов, Марина В. Шаманова. 2013a. Выявление признаков унижения чести, достоинства, умаления деловой репутации и оскорбления в лингвистической экспертизе текста. Ярославль: Ярославский государственный университет им. П. Г. Демидова.

Стернин, Иосиф А. Любовь Г. Антонова, Дмитрий Л. Карпов, Марина В. Шаманова. 2013b. Основные понятия лингво-криминалистической экспертизы. Ярославль: Канцлер.

Ярощук, Инна А., Наталья А. Жукова, Наталья И. Долженко. 2020. Лингвистическая экспертиза. Белгород: Белгородский государственный университет.

References

Akinina, Anastasiia. 2020a. “‘Go to h…!’: An insult or not?”. Lingekspert. Lingvisticheskie ekspertizy dlia biznesa i chastnykh lits. Accessed July 24, 2021. https://akinina-lingexpert.ru/idi-na-h-oskorblenie-ilinet.(In Russian)

Akinina, Anastasiia. 2020b. “‘Go to h…!’: An insult or not?”. Pravdorub: professional’noe soobshchestvo iuristov i advokatov. Accessed July 24, 2021. https://user239811.pravorub.ru/personal/95184.html. (In Russian)

Baranov, Anatolii N. 2007. Linguistic examination of the text. Theory and practice. Moscow, Flinta Publ.; Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Bel’chikov, Iulii A., Mikhail V. Gorbanevskii, Igor V. Zharkov. 2010. Guidelines for linguistic expertise of disputable media texts. Collection of materials. Moscow, Informkniga Publ. (In Russian)

Evgen’eva, Anastasiia P., ed. 1999. Russian dictionary. In 4 parts, 4th ed. Moscow, Russkii iazyk Publ.; Poligrafresursy Publ. Accessed July 24, 2021. http://feb-web.ru/feb/mas/mas-abc/09/ma166834.htm?cmd=0&istext=1. (In Russian)

Galiashina, Elena I. 2020. Forensic science of speech. Moscow, Norma Publ. (In Russian)

Gorbanevskii, Mikhail V. ed. 2006. How to conduct a linguistic examination of a controversial text? Memo for judges, media, jurists, lawyers, prosecutors, investigators, investigators and experts. 2nd ed., rev. and enlarged. Moscow, Iuridicheskii mir Publ. (In Russian)

Iaroshchuk, Inna A., Natal’ia A. Zhukova, Natal’ia I. Dolzhenko. 2020. Linguistic examination. Belgorod, Belgorodskii gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)

Il’iasov, Farhad N., ed. 1994. Russian swearing (Anthology). Moscow, Lada M Publ. Accessed July 24, 2021. https://facetia.ru/node/4349. (In Russian)

Izotova, Tamara M., Vitalii O. Kuznetsov, Anna M. Plotnikova. 2016. Forensic linguistic examination in cases of insult. Moscow, Rossiiskii federal’nyi tsentr sudebnoi ekspertizy Publ. (In Russian)

Sternin, Iosif A., Liubov’ G. Antonova, Dmitrii L. Karpov, Marina V. Shamanova. 2013a. Identification of signs of humiliation of honor, dignity, belittling of business reputation and insult in the linguistic examination of the text. Yaroslavl, Iaroslavskii gosudarstvennyi universitet im. P. G. Demidova Publ. (In Russian)

Sternin, Iosif A., Liubov’ G. Antonova, Dmitrii L. Karpov, Marina V. Shamanova. 2013b. Basic concepts of linguo-forensic examination. Yaroslavl, Kantsler Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2023-03-02

How to Cite

Akhunzianova, F. T. (2023). Actual practice of linguist expert within the speech offenses: Relevance and problems. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 14(1), 254–265. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.116

Issue

Section

Legal Life: Scientific-Practical Conclusions, Comments and Reviews