Axiological ground of labor law (experience of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation)

Authors

  • Svetlana Yu. Golovina Ural State Law University named after V. F. Yakovlev, 21, ul. Komsomolskaya, Ekaterinburg, 620137, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3987-121X
  • Kirill L. Tomashevski Public Association “Society of Labor Law”, 62, ul. Kalvariyskaya, Minsk, 220073, Republic of Belarus https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-4943

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.204

Abstract

The article attempts a comprehensive analysis of the axiological principles of labor law, based on the legislative experience and law enforcement practice of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation. In the introduction, the authors define the concept of the axiology of labor law as part of the philosophy of labor law. The scientific discussion about the ideas, goals and values of labor law, existing as in the Western science of labor law, is demonstrated. The following parts of the article explore the key values and principles of labor law with value content, which are most important for the branch of labor law. Special attention is paid in the article to the principles of freedom of labor and freedom of the labor contract, the prohibition of forced labor. The problem of “golden parachutes”, which is relevant for modern Russia, is touched upon, which contradicts the idea of social justice. The norms of the labor legislation of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation are compared with international labor standards formed within the framework of the International Labor Organization. Concrete proposals are made to improve the labor legislation of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation in the direction of ensuring the above-mentioned legal principles with evaluative content, as well as to achieve the goal of ensuring the quality of working life of employees and other categories of workers, including employees engaged under fixed-term employment contracts (contracts) and various categories of self-employed persons. In conclusion, ideas on further harmonization of the legislation of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation, with other member states of the Eurasian Economic Union are formulated.

Keywords:

axiology, labor law, values, freedom of labor, freedom of labor contract, prohibition of forced labor, employees, employers

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Аверинцев, Сергей С., Эдвард А. Араб-Оглы, Леонид Ф. Ильичев, Сергей М. Ковалев, Наум М. Ланда, Виктор Г. Панов, Вячеслав С. Степин, Петр Н. Федосеев, ред. 1989. Философский энциклопедический словарь. 2-е изд. М.: Советская энциклопедия.

Бугров, Леонид Ю. 1984. Свобода труда и свобода трудового договора в СССР (юридический аспект). Красноярск: Изд-во Красноярск. ун-та.

Бугров, Леонид Ю. 2010. «Свобода труда и увольнение по инициативе работника». Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки 1 (7): 74–103.

Бугров, Леонид Ю. 2013. Трудовой договор в России и за рубежом. Пермь: Пермский государственный национальный исследовательский университет.

Войтковская, Илона В. 2020. «Золотые парашюты в США и России: как это работает?» Российское право: образование, практика, наука 4: 48–155.

Головина, Светлана Ю. 2012. «Проблемы разрешения судами споров о “золотых парашютах”». Налоги и финансовое право 5: 207–214.

Иванов, Семен А., Роман З. Лившиц. 1982. Личность в советском трудовом праве. М.: Наука.

Кручинин, Алексей В. 2015. «Методологические аспекты рассмотрения проблемы свободы труда и свободы трудового договора». Вестник Удмуртского университета. Сер. Экономика и право 25 (1): 174–180.

Лушникова, Марина В., Андрей М. Лушников. 2006. Очерки теории трудового права. СПб.: Юридический центр Пресс.

Лушников, Андрей М., Марина В. Лушникова. 2021. Трудовое право. М.: Проспект.

Лютов, Никита Л. 2014. Эффективность норм международного трудового права. М.: Проспект.

Лютов, Никита Л. 2017. «Выплаты при увольнении и договоры о неконкуренции с руководящими работниками». Lex russica 10: 123–130.

Маврин, Сергей П., Евгений Б. Хохлов, Валерий А. Сафонов, ред. 2021. Трудовое право России. М.: Проспект.

Мотина, Евгения В. 2013. «Принудительный труд — противоположность достойного труда». Пути реализации в России программы достойного труда и достойного социального обеспечения: материалы девятой международной научно-практической конференции, 351–356. М.: Проспект.

Таль, Лев С. 2006. Трудовой договор: цивилистическое исследование. М.: Статут.

Томашевский, Кирилл Л. 2019. «Срочные трудовые договоры (контракты) как одна из причин прекаризации на рынке труда Беларуси». Юстиция Беларуси 10: 29–31.

Collins, Hugh, Gillian Lester, Virginia Mantouvalou. 2018. Philisophical foundations of labour law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Davidov, Guy. 2016. A purposive approach to labour law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Davidov, Guy, Brian Langille, eds. 2011. The idea of labour law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

References

Averintsev, Sergei S., Edward A. Arab-Ogly, Leonid F. Ilyichev, Sergey M. Kovalev, Naum M. Landa, Victor G. Panov, Vyacheslav S. Stepin, Petr N. Fedoseev, eds. 1989. Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary. 2nd ed. Moscow, Sovetskaia entsiklopediia Publ. (In Russian)

Bugrov, Leonid Iu. 1984. Freedom of labor and freedom of labor contract in the USSR (legal aspect). Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarskii universitet Publ. (In Russian)

Bugrov, Leonid Iu. 2010. “Freedom of labor and dismissal at the initiative of the employee”. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Iuridicheskie nauki 1 (7): 74–103. (In Russian)

Bugrov, Leonid Iu. 2013. Employment contract in Russia and abroad. Perm, Permskii gosudarstvennyi natsional’nyi issledovatel’skii universitet Publ. (In Russian)

Collins, Hugh, Gillian Lester, Virginia Mantouvalou. 2018. Philisophical foundations of labour law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Davidov, Guy. 2016. A purposive approach to labour law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Davidov, Guy, Brian Langille, eds. 2011. The idea of labour law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Golovina, Svetlana Iu. 2012. “Problems of resolving disputes about ‘golden parachutes’ by courts”. Nalogi i finansovoe pravo 5: 207–214. (In Russian)

Ivanov, Semen A., Roman Z. Livshits. 1982. Personality in Soviet labor law. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Kruchinin, Aleksei V. 2015. “Methodological aspects of consideration of the problem of freedom of labor and freedom of the labor contract”. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Ser. Ekonomika i pravo 25 (1): 174–180. (In Russian)

Liutov, Nikita L. 2014. The effectiveness of international labor law. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. (In Russian)

Liutov, Nikita L. 2017. “Severance payments and non-competition agreements with executive officers”. Lex russica 10: 123–130. (In Russian)

Lushnikova, Marina V., Andrei M. Lushnikov. 2006. Essays on the theory of labor law. St. Petersburg, Iuridicheskii tsentr Press. (In Russian)

Lushnikov, Andrei M., Marina V. Lushnikova. 2021. Labor law. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. (In Russian)

Mavrin, Sergei P., Eugene B. Khokhlov, Valery A. Safonov, eds. 2021. Labor law of Russia. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. (In Russian)

Motina, Evgeniia V. 2013. “Forced labor is the opposite of decent work”. Puti realizatsii v Rossii programmy dostoinogo truda i dostoinogo sotsial’nogo obespecheniia: Materials of the ninth international scientific and practical conference, 351–356. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. (In Russian)

Tal’, Lev S. 2006. Labor contract: Civilist research. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Tomashevski, Kirill L. 2019. “Fixed-term employment contracts (contracts) as one of the reasons for precarization in the labor market of Belarus”. Justice of Belarus 10: 29–31. (In Russian)

Voitkovskaia, Ilona V. 2020. “Golden parachutes in the USA and Russia: How does it work?” Rossiiskoe pravo: Obrazovanie, praktika, nauka 4: 48–155. (In Russian)

Published

2023-05-11

How to Cite

Golovina, S. Y., & Tomashevski, K. L. (2023). Axiological ground of labor law (experience of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 14(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.204

Issue

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research