Сравнительно-правовой анализ института условно-досрочного освобождения от отбывания наказания в уголовном законодательстве России и зарубежных стран

Sergei L. Babaian; Kamo K. Garibian; Ashot S. Airapetian

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2022.213

Authors

Sergei L. Babaian Russian State University of Justice, 69, ul. Novocheremushkinskaya, Moscow, 117418, Russian Federation; Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, 15a, ul. Narvskaya, Moscow, 125130, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8712-0192
Kamo K. Garibian Criminal Executive Inspectorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia in Moscow, 24–26, ul. Seleznevskaya, Moscow, 127473, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7547-3641
Ashot S. Airapetian Center for Legal Education and Implementation rehabilitation programs, 3/8, ul. Vazgena Sargsyana, Yerevan, 0010, Republic of Armenia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5937-8185

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.213

Abstract

The article is devoted to the institution of parole from serving a sentence (hereinafter — parole) as an important incentive for law-abiding behavior of convicts in Russia and some foreign countries. A comparative legal analysis of the conditions for the use of this incentive institution in order to optimize the domestic criminal and penal legislation, taking into account foreign experience, is carried out. Reflected proposals to improve the efficiency of the parole mechanism in law enforcement practice. The authors reveal the grounds and conditions for the use of the incentive institute of parole in some countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States (hereinafter — the CIS), as well as in England, Germany, USA, Spain, Switzerland, etc. Particular attention is paid to the issue of parole in relation to those sentenced to life imprisonment freedom. Based on the study of the positive experience of developed foreign countries (England, Germany, Switzerland), it is proposed to change the parole mechanism in relation to life-sentenced prisoners in Russia and to provide for the possibility of transferring these persons with positively characterized behavior after serving at least 15 years of their sentence from the penal colony of the special regime in the penal colony with a strict regime, as well as to reduce the obligatory term of serving the sentence for the onset of parole in relation to those sentenced to life imprisonment from 25 to 20 years. In order to reduce recidivism among those on parole and reduce the number of those sentenced to punishments not related to isolation from society, it seems expedient, based on the experience of some CIS countries, to provide for the possibility of parole in relation to those sentenced to punishment in the form of correctional labor and restraint of freedom.

Keywords:

release on parole, deprivation of liberty, incentive institution, social adaptation, foreign experience, criminal inspection

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Бабаян, Сергей Л. 2014. «Поощрительные институты уголовно-исполнительного права (теория и практика применения)». Дис. … д-ра юрид. наук, Московский государственный лингвистический университет.

Баламут, Александр Н., Вячеслав М. Поздняков. 2018. «Об ориентирах в оценке степени психологической готовности осужденных с пожизненными сроками отбывания наказания к освобождению». Вестник института: преступление, наказание, исправление 4 (44): 121–126.

Ванина, Алена А. 2018. «Особенности применения и исполнения пожизненного лишения свободы в России и за рубежом». Бюллетень науки и практики 1: 297–303.

Горбач, Денис В. 2011. «Условно-досрочное освобождение от пожизненного лишения свободы в законодательстве некоторых зарубежных стран». Прикладная юридическая психология 4: 147–150.

Гуриев, Марат С., Олег А Цывинский. 2013. «Сколько стоит досрочное освобождение». Ведомости. Дата обращения 30 июля, 2020. https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2013/02/12/skolko_stoit_dosrochnoe_osvobozhdenie.

Гэу, Виктория Л. 2018. «Об особенностях деятельности службы пробации в Великобритании». Материалы Всероссийской научно-практической конференции «Уголовно-исполнительная система: педагогика, психология и право», 108–115. Томск: Томский институт повышения квалификации работников Федеральной службы исполнения наказаний.

Козочкин, Иван Д. 1998. Уголовное законодательство зарубежных стран (Англии, США, Франции, Германии, Японии). М.: Зерцало.

Кудашева, Виктория В. 2018. «Институт условно-досрочного освобождения от наказания в Соединенных Штатах Америки». Отечественная юриспруденция 5: 44–47.

Серебренникова, Анна В. 2002. Уголовный кодекс Швейцарии. СПб.: Юридический центр Пресс.

Фумм, Александра М. 2011. «Английская прогрессивная система тюремного заключения: история и современность». Пенитенциарная наука 16: 68–72.

Kennedy, Daniel B. 1973. Resocialization: An American experiment. New York: Behavioral Publ.

Liebknecht, Karl A. 1919. Briefe aus dem Felde, aus der Untersuchungshaft und aus dem Zuchthaus. Berlin; Wilmersdorf: Die Aktion.

Stelly, Wolfgang, Thomas Jurgen. 2006. Straffälligenhilfe in Zeiten der Privatisierung und Rationalisierung. Дата обращения 20 августа, 2020. http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/institute/fak2/krimi/DVJJ/Aufsaetze/Stelly%20Thomas%202006.pdf.

References

Babaian, Sergei L. 2014. “Incentive institutions of criminal executive law (theory and practice of application)”. Dr. Sci. diss, Moskovskii gosudarstvennyi lingvisticheskii universitet. (In Russian)

Balamut, Aleksandr N., Viacheslav M. Pozdniakov. 2018. “On guidelines for assessing the degree of psychological readiness of convicts with life sentences for release”. Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie,ispravlenie 4 (44): 121–126. (In Russian)

Fumm, Aleksandra M. 2011. “The English progressive prison system: History and modernity”. Penitentsiarnaia nauka 16: 68–72. (In Russian)

Gėu, Viktoriia L. 2018. “On the peculiarities of the probation service in the UK”. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Ugolovno-ispolnitel’naia sistema: pedagogika, psikhologiia i parvo”, 108–115. Tomsk, Tomskii institut povysheniia kvalifikatsii rabotnikov Federal’noi sluzhby ispolneniia nakazanii. (In Russian)

Gorbach, Denis V. 2011. “Conditional early release from life imprisonment in the legislation of some foreign countries”. Prikladnaia iuridicheskaia psikhologiia 4: 147–150. (In Russian)

Guriev, Marat S., Oleg A. Tsyvinskii. 2013. “How much does early release cost”. Vedomosti. Accessed July 30, 2020. https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2013/02/12/skolko_stoit_dosrochnoe_osvobozhdenie.(In Russian)

Kennedy, Daniel B. 1973. Resocialization: An American experiment. New York, Behavioral Publ.

Kozochkin, Ivan D. Criminal legislation of foreign countries (England, USA, France, Germany, Japan). Moscow, Zertsalo Publ. (In Russian)

Kudasheva, Viktoriiza V. 2018. “Parole Institute in the United States of America”. Otechestvennaia iurisprudentsiia 5: 44–47. (In Russian)

Liebknecht, Karl A. 1919. Briefe aus dem Felde, aus der Untersuchungshaft und aus dem Zuchthaus. Berlin, Wilmersdorf, Die Aktion.

Serebrennikova, Anna V. 2002. Criminal Code of Switzerland. St Petersburg, Iuridicheskii tsentr Press Publ.(In Russian)

Stelly, Wolfgang, Thomas Jurgen. 2006. Straffälligenhilfe in Zeiten der Privatisierung und Rationalisierung. Accessed August 20, 2020. http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/institute/fak2/krimi/DVJJ/Aufsaetze/Stelly%20Thomas%202006.pdf.

Vanina, Alena A. 2018. “Features of the application and execution of life imprisonment in Russia and abroad”. Biulleten’ nauki i praktiki 1: 297–303. (In Russian)