Chinese-Russian mechanism of the high-level judicial cooperation

Authors

  • Jiang Siyuan China National Institute for SCO International Exchange and Judicial Cooperation, 7989, Waiqingsong Road, Qingpu District, Shanghai, 201701, People’s Republic of China
  • Gan Zhongyang Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, 7989, Waiqingsong Road, Qingpu District, Shanghai, 201701, People’s Republic of China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.316

Abstract

In the past 70 years, Chinese-Russian relations have reached an unprecedentedly high level. The People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation, in the spirit of neighborliness, friendship, and cooperation, are developing comprehensive partnership and strategic cooperation in this new era to raise bilateral relations to a new and higher level. The high-level interaction mechanisms established between Russia and China have played a crucial role in achieving new ambitious goals and long-term benchmarks for cooperation. Judicial cooperation has broad development prospects as an important guarantee for interaction in areas that are truly important for both countries. The strengthening of judicial cooperation between Russia and China, on the one hand, promotes the conjunction and adaptation of various institutional arrangements involving mutual trade, investment, and economic cooperation, such as trade and investment rules, technical standards, and legal bases between countries. Cooperation also provides a basis for the development of relevant uniform rules. On the other hand, it also helps to improve the level of foreign-related legal services, including lawyers, notaries and mediation, to ensure the free flow of various elements between different economies, to help small and medium-sized enterprises operate in full compliance with the law and resolve disputes. In order to serve the needs of participants in international trade between Russia and China, promote the policy of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and the construction of the “Silk Road Economic Belt”, it is possible to improve the level of special foreign-related legal services, create legal service platforms, build an experienced international legal services team, and establish one more mechanism of judicial cooperation under the unique, effective mechanism of regular meetings between the heads of the Russian and Chinese governments.

Keywords:

China, Russia, legal cooperation, mechanisms of legal cooperation, training of legal personnel, Russian-Chinese relations

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

王丽娟 辛巍巍. 2018. “中俄全面战略协作伙伴关系研究[J]”. 智库时代 22:31–34 [Ван, Лицзюань, Синь Вэйвэй. 2018. «Исследование российско-китайских отношений всеобъемлющего партнерства и стратегического взаимодействия». Эра аналитических центров> 22: 31–34].>

毛艳. 2014. “中俄关系制度化发展的特征与成效[J]”. 理论观察 6:92–93 [Мао, Янь. 2014. «Особенности и эффекты развития институционализации китайско-российских отношений». Теоретическое обсуждение 6: 92–93].>

刘波. 2018. “中俄经济合作与“一带一盟”对接—第五届中俄经济合作与“一带一盟”对接高层智库论坛纪实[J]”. 西伯利亚研究 3: 90–92 [Лю, Бо. 2018. «Материалы 5-го международного форума ведущих “мозговых центров” по китайско-российскому экономическому сотрудничеству и сопряжению Экономического пояса Шелкового пути с ЕАЭС». Исследования Сибири 3: 90–92].>

References

Liú, Bō. 2018. “The proceedings of the 5th Russia-China economic cooperation and the conjunction of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and “Silk Road Economic Belt” Think Tank Forum”. Xībólìyǎ yánjiū 3: 90–92. (In Chinese)

Máo, Yàn. 2014. “The characteristics and effects of the development of institutionalization of Russia-China relations”. Lǐlùn guānchá 6: 92–93. (In Chinese)

Wáng, Lìjuān, Xīn, Wēiwēi. 2018. “Study on the Chinese-Russian relations of comprehensive partnership and strategic interaction”. Zhìkù shídài 22: 31–34. (In Chinese)

Published

2020-10-30

How to Cite

Siyuan, J., & Zhongyang, G. (2020). Chinese-Russian mechanism of the high-level judicial cooperation. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 11(3), 760–770. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.316

Issue

Section

Legal Life: Scientific-Practical Conclusions, Comments and Reviews