Проблемы правового регулирования оперативно-розыскного обеспечения безопасности Российской Федерации

Vasilii V. Semenchuk

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2021.413

Authors

Vasilii V. Semenchuk Far Eastern Law Institute of the Russian Interior, 15, Kazarmenny per., Khabarovsk, 680020, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9793-8385

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.413

Abstract

The article discusses the problematic issues of implementing operative-investigative activity related to obtaining information on threats to the security of the Russian Federation. According to the author, the main problem is a contradiction in the provisions between the Federal Law “On the operative-investigative activity” with the sectoral legislation regulating the state bodies engaged in operative-investigative activity. First of all, the terminology of the sectoral legislation does not comply with the Federal Law “On operational-investigative activity”. Secondly, sectoral legislation does not provide the same degree of protection for all types of security of the Russian Federation. For example, sectoral legislation does not permit operative-investigative activity in order to identify threats to environmental safety. Thirdly, officials of state bodies do not always clearly understand which law to execute. We can conclude that only the bodies of the Federal Security Service and the Federal Guard Service are directly vested with the rights to carry out operative-investigative activity in order to identify threats to the security of the Russian Federation. However, officials involved in operative-investigative activity often do not take into account their operational-search jurisdiction and go beyond their established authority. In order to eliminate this problem, the author proposes to bring the provisions of sectoral legislation in line with the Federal Law “On operative-investigative activity”. Another problem that impedes the effective operative-investigative support for the security of the Russian Federation, in the author’s opinion, is the insufficiency of specification of security threats as grounds for conducting operative-investigative measures. The author proposes to address in the legislation the most significant threats to the security of the Russian Federation, which can be regarded as independent grounds for implementing operative-investigative measures.

Keywords:

operative-investigative activity, operative-investigative measures, security of the Russian Federation, operative-investigative jurisdiction, security threats, national interests, operative-investigative support

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Бахта, Андрей С., Евгений В. Буряков, Олег А. Вагин. 2013. Федеральный закон «Об оперативно-розыскной деятельности»: научно-практический комментарий. Хабаровск: Дальневосточный юридический институт Министерства внутренних дел РФ.

Блинов, Юрий С., Олег А. Вагин, Анатолий С. Вандышев. 2006. Теория оперативно-розыскной деятельности. М.: ИНФРА-М.

Воронов, Алексей М. 2014. «Концепция общественной безопасности: вопросы реализации». Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки 4 (26): 35–42.

Дубоносов, Евгений С. 2014. Оперативно-розыскная деятельность. М.: Юрайт.

Зникин, Валерий К. 2015. «Уголовный процесс без криминалистики и ОРД: проблемная ситуация». Вестник Томского государственного университета. Право 4 (18): 30–36.

Косоногов, Дмитрий А. 2012. «О понятии обеспечения собственной безопасности в уголовно-исполнительной системе». Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки 2 (16): 215–222.

Татьянина, Лариса Г., Анастасия С. Лукомская, Рифат Р. Юлдошев. 2019. «Понятие, сущность и современные перспективы предупреждения экологической преступности в Российской Федерации». Всероссийский криминологический журнал 13 (1): 103–113.

Шатохин, Иван. 2018. «Принцип уважения и соблюдения прав и свобод человека и гражданина в оперативно-розыскной деятельности». Дис. … канд. юрид. наук, Санкт-Петербургский университет МВД России.

Шумилов, Александр Ю. 2008. Курс основ оперативно-розыскной деятельности. М.: Издательский дом Шумиловой И. И.

References

Bakhta, Andrei S., Evgenii V. Buriakov, Oleg A. Vagin. 2013. Federal law “On operative-investigative activity”: scientific and practical commentary. Khabarovsk, Dal’nevostochnyi iuridicheskii institut Ministerstva vnutrennikh del RF Publ. (In Russian)

Blinov, Iurii S., Oleg A. Vagin, Anatolii S. Vandyshev. 2006. Theory of operative-investigative activity. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ. (In Russian)

Dubonosov, Evgenii S. 2014. The operative-investigative activity. Moscow, Iurait Publ. (In Russian)

Kosonogov, Dmitrii A. 2012. “About the concept of ensuring their own security in the penal system”. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Iuridicheskie nauki 2 (16): 215–222. (In Russian)

Shatokhin, Ivan. 2018. “The principle of respect and observance of human and civil rights and freedoms in operative-investigative activity”. PhD Diss., Sankt-Peterburgskii universitet MVD Rossii. (In Russian)

Shumilov, Aleksandr Iu. 2008. The basic course of the operative-investigative activity. Moscow, Shumilova I. I. Publ. (In Russian)

Tat’ianina, Larisa G., Anastasiia S. Lukomskaia, Rifat R. Iuldoshev. 2019. “The concept, essence and modern prospects of the prevention of environmental crime in the Russian Federation”. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal 13 (1): 103–113. (In Russian)

Voronov, Aleksei M. 2014. “Conception of the public safety: implementation issues”. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Iuridicheskie nauki 4 (26): 35–42. (In Russian)

Znikin, Valerii K. 2015. “Criminal process without forensics and operative-investigative activity: the problem situation”. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo 4 (18): 30–36. (In Russian)