Получение электронной информации по уголовным делам в рамках международного сотрудничества

Kirill K. Klevtsov; Vitaliy F. Vasyukov

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2021.103

Authors

Kirill K. Klevtsov Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, 76, pr. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2918-175X
Vitaliy F. Vasyukov Oryol Institute of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation named after V. V. Lukyanov, 2, ul. Ignatova, Oryol, 302025, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0743-5616

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.103

Abstract

The explosive growth of information and communication technologies, which has affected human social communication institutions, has become commensurate with the increase in potential risks to the security and rights of citizens. The authors of the article attempt to highlight the issues of international cooperation between law enforcement agencies of the Russian Federation and other countries in the framework of obtaining electronic information that is important for proving criminal cases. Attention is paid to procedures for ensuring the collection and use of electronic data in the response to crime occurring in the current fine line of confidentiality of privacy and security. Despite the mutual agreements signed between many countries of the world, the practical implementation of regulations that ensure the provision of electronic information in the framework of international cooperation is currently fraught with certain problems. Meanwhile, in the context of countering such dangerous phenomena for the world community as terrorism, extremism, drug trafficking, weapons, and people, a single mechanism for exchanging information stored on a gigantic scale on the servers of Telecom operators and providers has not yet been developed. The actual search for data stored on mobile devices usually requires a warrant in common law countries. In situations where there is a significant risk of loss of evidence, such as when data detection and other computer forensics tools are actively used, some jurisdictions allow law enforcement agencies to perform limited searches of devices without a warrant due to alleged data vulnerability. Another problem is the retention of stored data, since different practices apply in different countries. In this regard, it is essential that investigators and prosecutors are well informed about geo-specific data mapping issues, including “embargoes” or bans on the exchange of computer information.

Keywords:

international cooperation, international agreement, procedural actions, investigative actions, computer information, legal assistance, electronic evidence, criminal proceedings, electronic messages, subscriber information, competent authorities

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Волеводз, Александр Г. 2018. «Международное сотрудничество в сфере уголовного судопроизводства по делам о преступлениях, совершенных с использованием криптовалюты: постановка проблемы». Современное уголовно-процессуальное право — уроки истории и проблемы дальнейшего реформирования: сб. материалов науч.-практ. конф., посвященной 300-летию российской полиции, 66–75. Орел: Орловский юридический институт МВД России.

Литвишко, Петр А. 2015. «Интеграция предварительного расследования и оперативно-розыскной деятельности: иностранный и международный опыт». Библиотека криминалиста: научный журнал 3: 309–319.

Малов, Александр 2018. «Получение электронных доказательств от иностранных юрисдикций (на примере США)». Законность 9: 56–60.

Шестак, Виктор А., Александр Г. Волеводз. 2019. «Современные потребности правового обеспечения искусственного интеллекта: взгляд из России». Всероссийский криминологический журнал 13 (2): 197–206.

Щерба, Сергей П. 2016. «Международное сотрудничество России в сфере выдачи для уголовного преследования на основе принципа взаимности». Международное уголовное право и международная юстиция 4: 3–8.

Borka, Jerman Blažič, Tomaž Klobučar. 2019. “Advancement in Cybercrime Investigation — the New European Legal Instruments for Collecting Cross-border e-Evidence”. International Conference on Information Technology & Systems, 858–867. Ljubljana.

Broadhurst Roderic, Peter Grabosky, Mamoun Alazab, Steve Chon. 2014. “Organizations and Cybercrime: an analysis of the nature of groups engaged in cybercrime”. International Journal of Cyber Criminology 8 (1): 1–20.

Brown, Cameron, S. D. 2015. “Investigating and Prosecuting Cyber Crime: Forensic Dependencies and Barriers to Justice”. International Journal of Cyber Criminology 9 (1): 55–119.

Buono, Laviero. 2019. “The genesis of the European Union’s new proposed legal instrument(s) on e-evidence”. ERA Forum 19 (3): 307–312.

Collin, Barry. 1997. “The Future of Cyberterrorism”. Crime & Justice International Journal 13 (2): 51–71.

Cox, Joseph. 2016. “Staying in the Shadows: The Use of Bitcoin and Encryption in Cryptomarkets”. The Internet and Drug Markets. Eds Jane Mounteney, Alberto Oteo, Paul Griffiths, 41–47. Lisbon: EMCDDA.

Dronova, Olga B., Boris P. Smagorinskiy, Vladislav B. Yastrebov. 2019. “Counteraction to e-commerce crimes committed with the use of online stores”. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control 181: 121–131.

Foley, Sean, Jonathan R. Karlsen, Talis J. Putnins. 2018. “Sex, Drugs, and Bitcoin: How Much Illegal Activity Is Financed Through Cryptocurrencies?” Review of Financial Studies, Forthcoming. SSRN. Дата обращения 1 января, 2020. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3102645.

Herrera-Flanigan, Jessica R., Sumit Ghosh. 2010. “Criminal Regulations”. Cybercrimes: A Multidisciplinary Analysis. Eds Sumit Ghosh, Elliot Turrini, 265–308. Berlin: Springer.

Leukfeldt, Eric R. 2015. “Organised cybercrime and social opportunity structures: a proposal for future research directions”. The European Review of Organised Crime 2: 91–103.

Lievens, Eva. 2014. “Bullying and sexting in social networks: protecting minors from criminal acts or empowering minors to cope with risky behaviour?” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 42 (3): 251–270.

Losavio, Michael M., K. P. Chow, Andras Koltay, Joshua James. 2018. “The Internet of Things and the Smart City: Legal challenges with digital forensics, privacy, and security”. Security and Privacy 1 (3): e23. https://doi.org/10.1002/spy2.23.

References

Borka, Jerman Blažič, Tomaž Klobučar. 2019. “Advancement in Cybercrime Investigation — the New European Legal Instruments for Collecting Cross-border e-Evidence”. International Conference on Information Technology & Systems, 858–867. Ljubljana.

Broadhurst Roderic, Peter Grabosky, Mamoun Alazab, Steve Chon. 2014. “Organizations and Cybercrime: an analysis of the nature of groups engaged in cybercrime”. International Journal of Cyber Criminology 8 (1): 1–20.

Brown, Cameron, S. D. 2015. “Investigating and Prosecuting Cyber Crime: Forensic Dependencies and Barriers to Justice”. International Journal of Cyber Criminology 9 (1): 55–119.

Buono, Laviero. 2019. “The genesis of the European Union’s new proposed legal instrument(s) on e-evidence”. ERA Forum 19 (3): 307–312.

Collin, Barry. 1997. “The Future of Cyberterrorism”. Crime & Justice International Journal 13 (2): 51–71.

Cox, Joseph. 2016. “Staying in the Shadows: The Use of Bitcoin and Encryption in Cryptomarkets”. The Internet and Drug Markets. Eds Jane Mounteney, Alberto Oteo, Paul Griffiths, 41–47. Lisbon: EMCDDA.

Dronova, Olga B., Boris P. Smagorinskiy, Vladislav B. Yastrebov. 2019. “Counteraction to e-commerce crimes committed with the use of online stores”. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control 181: 121–131.

Foley, Sean, Jonathan R. Karlsen, Talis J. Putnins. 2018. “Sex, Drugs, and Bitcoin: How Much Illegal Activity Is Financed Through Cryptocurrencies?” Review of Financial Studies, Forthcoming. SSRN. Accessed January 1, 2020. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3102645.

Herrera-Flanigan, Jessica R., Sumit Ghosh. 2010. “Criminal Regulations”. Cybercrimes: A Multidisciplinary Analysis. Eds Sumit Ghosh, Elliot Turrini, 265–308. Berlin: Springer.

Leukfeldt, Eric R. 2015. “Organised cybercrime and social opportunity structures: a proposal for future research directions”. The European Review of Organised Crime 2: 91–103.

Lievens, Eva. 2014. “Bullying and sexting in social networks: protecting minors from criminal acts or empowering minors to cope with risky behaviour?” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 42 (3): 251–270.

Litvishko, Petr A. 2015. “Integration of the preliminary investigation and operational-search activity: foreign experience”. Biblioteka kriminalista: nauchnyi zhurnal 3: 309–319. (In Russian)

Losavio, Michael M., K. P. Chow, Andras Koltay, Joshua James. 2018. “The Internet of Things and the Smart City: Legal challenges with digital forensics, privacy, and security”. Security and Privacy 1 (3): e23. https://doi.org/10.1002/spy2.23.

Malov, Aleksandr. 2018. “Obtaining electronic evidence from foreign jurisdictions (for example USA)”. Zakonnost’ 9: 56–60. (In Russian)

Shcherba, Sergei P. 2016. “International cooperation of Russia in the sphere of extradition for criminal prosecution on the basis of reciprocity”. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaia iustitsiia 4: 3–8. (In Russian)

Shestak, Viktor A., Aleksandr G. Volevodz. 2019. “Modern requirements of legal security artificial intelligence: a view from Russia”. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal 13 (2): 197–206. (In Russian)

Volevodz, Aleksandr G. 2018. “International cooperation in the field of criminal justice in cases of crimes committed with the use of cryptocurrency: problem”. Sovremennoe ugolovno-protsessual’noe pravo — uroki istorii i problemy dal’neishego reformirovaniia: sb. materialov nauch.-prakt. konf., posviashchennoi 300-letiiu rossiiskoi politsii, 66–75. Orel, Orlovskii iuridicheskii institut MVD Rossii Publ. (In Russian)