Изъятие предметов, веществ и материалов до возбуждения уголовного дела: основания, проблемы и пути их решения

Alexey I. Alexandrov; Elena V. Elagina; Anton G. Kharatishvili

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2020.407

Authors

Alexey I. Alexandrov St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3543-2992
Elena V. Elagina St. Petersburg Law Institute (branch) of the University of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation, 44, Liteiny pr., St. Petersburg, 191104, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0250-0418
Anton G. Kharatishvili St. Petersburg Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, 96, nab. r. Moiki, St. Petersburg, 191100, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0392-9611

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.407

Abstract

Problems at the stage of the initiation of criminal proceedings, both in the criminal process and in criminalistics, have always been perceived as acutely relevant. After all, it is at this stage of criminal proceedings that the formation of the evidence base begins where as a rule, the collection, documentation and subsequent research of material objects (objects, substances and materials) both seized in the course of investigative actions, and received in the course of other actions, can be conditionally called non — procedural. Practice shows that law enforcement officers refer to the Federal law “On Police”, The Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, and the norms of the Federal Law “On Operational and Investigative Activities” to justify the legality and legitimacy of their actions, which, according to the authors, is very controversial, since these normative sources do not contain the appropriate grounds. This article deals with issues related to the seizure of material objects — items, substances and materials that are important for the investigation of crimes, in cases when a criminal case has not yet been initiated, which limits the possibility of using the procedural mechanisms provided for by criminal procedure legislation implemented at the stage of preliminary investigation. The authors are not restricted to criminal procedural institutions and consider the problem of seizures in the context of administrative law and legislation governing investigative activities.

Keywords:

the removal of items, substances and materials, the initiation of criminal proceedings, investigative actions, operational investigative activities, procedural activities in applying measures of administrative coercion

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Артемова, Виктория В. 2014. «Проблемные аспекты реализации истребования и изъятия предметов и документов на этапе возбуждения уголовного дела». Российский следователь 3: 3–5.

Великий, Дмитрий П. 2014. «Практика применения норм о допустимости доказательств в уголовном процессе». Журнал российского права 6: 95–100.

Гармаев, Юрий П. 2004. Использование результатов оперативно-розыскной деятельности в доказывании по уголовным делам о незаконном обороте наркотиков: практическое пособие. Иркутск: Издательство ИПКПР ГП РФ.

Глушков, Максим Р. 2015. «Документирование изъятия в ходе оперативно-разыскной деятельности». Российский следователь 2: 48–52.

Головко, Леонид В. 2017. Курс уголовного процесса. М.: Статут.

Елагина, Елена В. 2013. «Роль Конституции Российской Федерации и решений Конституционного Суда Российской Федерации в обеспечении преодоления противодействия расследованию, осуществляемого путем отказа от дачи сравнительных образцов в связи с назначением судебной экспертизы». КриминалистЪ 2 (13): 107–110.

Елагина, Елена В., Татьяна В. Аверьянова. 2015. «К вопросу о недопустимости расширительного толкования возможности “изъятия” и “истребования” применительно к производству следственных действий, осуществляемых в ходе проверки сообщения о преступлении в порядке ст. 144–145 УПК РФ». Вестник криминалистики 2 (54): 63–71.

Ищенко, Евгений П., Антон Г. Харатишвили. 2009. «Как правильно оформить изъятие контрабандных наркотиков». Вестник Академии Генеральной прокуратуры Российской Федерации 5 (13): 46–51.

Казаринова, Лиана В. 2011. «Обеспечение безопасности осужденных при производстве неотложных следственных действий в расследовании преступлений против жизни». Российский следователь 16: 35–37.

Каретников, Александр С., Сергей А. Коретников. 2014. «Следственные действия как способы проверки сообщения о преступлении». Законность 7: 39–43.

References

Artemova, Viktoria V. 2014. “Problematic aspects of the implementation of reclamation and seizure of objects and documents at the stage of initiation of criminal proceedings”. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ 3: 3–5. (In Russian)

Elagina, Elena V. 2013. “The role of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the decisions of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in ensuring the overcoming of opposition to the investigation carried out by refusing to give comparative samples in connection with the appointment of a judicial examination”. Kriminalist” 2 (13): 107–110. (In Russian)

Elagina, Elena V., Tatiana V. Averyanova. 2015. “On the inadmissibility of a broad interpretation of the possibility of ‘seizure’ and ‘reclamation’ in relation to the production of investigative actions carried out during the inspection of the report of the crime in accordance with Art. 144–145 of the Criminal code”. Vestnik kriminalistiki 2 (54): 63–71. (In Russian)

Garmaev, Iuri P. 2004. Use of results of operational search activities in averment on criminal cases on illegal turnover of drugs: practical guide. Irkutsk, IPKPR GP RF Publ. (In Russian)

Glushkov, Maxim R. 2015. “Documentation of seizure in the course of operational-search activity”. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ 2: 48–52. (In Russian)

Golovko, Leonid V. 2017. Course of criminal procedure. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Ishchenko, Evgeny P., Anton G. Kharatishvili. 2009. “How to make a seizure of smuggled drugs”. Vestnik Akademii General’noi prokuratury Rossiiskoi Federatsii 5 (13): 46–51. (In Russian)

Karetnikov, Alexander S., Sergey A. Koretnikov. 2014. “Investigative actions as ways of verification of the message on a crime”. Zakonnost’ 7: 39–43. (In Russian)

Kazarinova, Liana V. 2011. “Ensuring the safety of convicts in the production of urgent investigative actions in the investigation of crimes against life”. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ 16: 35–37. (In Russian)

Velikiy, Dmitry P. 2014. “The Practice of applying the rules of admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings”. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 6: 95–100. (In Russian)