Искусственный интеллект и уголовная ответственность: проблемы становления нового вида субъекта преступления

Илья Николаевич Мосечкин

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2019.304

Authors

Илья Николаевич Мосечкин Vyatka State University, 36, Moskovskaya ul., Kirov, 610002, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.304

Abstract

This article is devoted to the investigation of artificial intelligence as a subject of crime and the problems of bringing it to criminal liability. The growth of the influence of self-taught programs in human life and their high rate of development determined the relevance of the study. It is noted that criminal legislation slowly adjusts to the emergence of new relationships. Legislation does not yet contain any formulations of crimes related to committing socially dangerous acts through the use of neural networks, artificial intelligence or artificial intelligence itself. The author analyzes objective signs of committing crimes related to the use of artificial intelligence. Currently, artificial intelligence is able to fully implement the objective side of several crimes provided for by criminal law, but this list will be expanded in the future. The author predicts options for possible illegal activities of self-taught programs. The content of the guilt of artificial intelligence remotely resembles the content of the intellectual and volitional elements of human activity. At the same time, the facts of infliction of harm by artificial intelligence are predominantly characterized by an analogue of human negligence. The study of subjective signs made it possible to form a list of subjects of crimes related to artificial intelligence: program maker; manufacturer or seller of products equipped with artificial intelligence; user of products equipped with artificial intelligence; other persons. It is argued that artificial intelligence is not an independent subject of a crime, but may become it in the future if it is recognized as a person.

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, artificial person, subject of crime, liability, robot, legal personality, cybercrime

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Архипов, Владислав В., Виктор Б. Наумов. 2017. «Искусственный интеллект и автономные устройства в контексте права: о разработке первого в России закона о робототехнике». Труды СПИИРАН 6 (55): 46–62.

Бугаков, Игорь А., Алексей Н. Царьков. 2018. «О когнитивном моделировании, искусственном интеллекте и психике роботов». Известия Института инженерной физики 48: 101–106.

Ведомости. 2018. «Беспилотник Uber сбил насмерть пешехода из-за настроек автопилота». Ведомости. 2018. 8 мая. Дата обращения 3 июля, 2018. https://www.vedomosti.ru/technology/news/2018/05/08/768916-bespilotnik-uber-sbil.

Елхов, Григорий А. 2014. «Искусственный интеллект и проблема моделирования его самосознания». Молодой ученый 16: 200–202.

Козаев, Нодар Ш. 2016. «Состояние уголовной политики и вопросы преодоления кризисных явлений в уголовном праве». Юридический вестник ДГУ 1: 96–101.

Лапунин, Михаил М. 2017. «Обстоятельства, исключающие преступность деяния, и научно-технический прогресс». Вестник Академии Генеральной прокуратуры Российской Федерации 6 (62): 81–87.

Маткова, Александра А. 2017. «Почему в ближайшие 3 года операционистов в банках может заменить искусственный интеллект?» Экономика. Право. Менеджмент: современные проблемы и тенденции развития 13: 10–18.

Морхат, Петр М. 2018. «К вопросу о соответствии автономных интеллектуальных систем вооружений принципам международного гуманитарного права». Вестник военного права 2: 58–65.

Понкин, Игорь В., Алена И. Редькина. 2018. «Искусственный интеллект с точки зрения права». Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Юридические науки 1: 91–109.

Юренко, Николай И. 2017. «Роботы — потенциальные субъекты права: миф или реальность». Инновации в науке и практике: сборник статей по материалам IV международной научно-практической конференции. Уфа.

Abatzoglou, John T., Williams, Park A. 2016. “Impact of Anthropogenic Climate Change on Wildfire across Western US Forests”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113: 11770–11775.

Beck, Susanne. 2016. “Intelligent Agents and Criminal Law — Negligence, Diffusion of Liability and Electronic Personhood”. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 86: 138–143.

Čerka, Paulius, Jurgita Grigienė, Girbikyte Sirbikytė. 2015. “Liability for Damages Caused by Artificial Intelligence”. Computer Law and Security Review 31: 376–389.

Douma, Frank, Sarah A. Palodichuk. 2012. “Criminal Liability Issues Created by Autonomous Vehicles”. Santa Clara Law Review 52: 1157–1169.

Hallevy, Gabriel. 2013. When Robots Kill: Artificial Intelligence Under Criminal Law. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

Hamet, Pavel, Johanne Tremblay. 2017. “Artificial intelligence in medicine”. Metabolism — Clinical and Experimental 69: 36–40.

Kingston, John K. C. 2016. “Artificial Intelligence and Legal Liability”, Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII: Incorporating Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XXIV, ed. by Max Bramer, Miltos Petridis: 269–279. Cambridge: Springer.

Neff, Gina, Peter Nagy. 2016. “Talking To Bots: Symbiotic Agency and the Case of Tay”. International Journal of Communication 10: 4915–4931.

Norman AI. n. d. Norman. Дата обращения 3 июля, 2018. http://norman-ai.mit.edu/.

Radutniy, Oleksandr E. 2017. “Criminal liability of the artificial intelligence”. Проблеми законності 138: 132–141.

References

Arkhipov, Vladislav V., Viktor B. Naumov. B. 2017. “Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Devices in Legal Context: On Development of the First Russian Law on Robotics”. Trudy SPIIRAN 6 (55): 46–62. (In Russian)

Abatzoglou, John T., Williams, Park A. 2016. “Impact of Anthropogenic Climate Change on Wildfire across Western US Forests”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113: 11770–11775.

Beck, Susanne. 2016. “Intelligent Agents and Criminal Law — Negligence, Diffusion of Liability and Electronic Personhood”. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 86: 138–143.

Bugakov, Igor’ A., Aleksei N. Tsar’kov. 2018. “About Cognitive Modeling, Artificial Intelligence and Psyche of Robots”. Izvestiia Instituta inzhenernoi fiziki 48: 101–106. (In Russian)

Čerka, Paulius, Jurgita Grigienė, Girbikyte Sirbikytė. 2015. “Liability for Damages Caused by Artificial Intelligence”. Computer Law and Security Review 31: 376–389.

Douma, Frank, Sarah A. Palodichuk. 2012. “Criminal Liability Issues Created by Autonomous Vehicles”. Santa Clara Law Review 52: 1157–1169.

Elkhov, Grigorii A. 2014. “Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Modeling his Self-Awareness”. Molodoi uchenyi 16: 200–202. (In Russian)

Hallevy, Gabriel. 2013. When Robots Kill: Artificial Intelligence Under Criminal Law. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

Hamet, Pavel, Johanne Tremblay. 2017. “Artificial intelligence in medicine”. Metabolism — Clinical and Experimental 69: 36–40.

Iurenko, Nikolai I. 2017. Robots are potential subjects of law: myth or reality. Innovatsii v nauke i praktike: sbornik statei po materialam IV mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Ufa. (In Russian)

Kingston, John K. C. 2016. “Artificial Intelligence and Legal Liability”, Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII: Incorporating Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XXIV, ed. by Max Bramer, Miltos Petridis: 269–279. Cambridge: Springer.

Kozaev, Nodar Sh. 2016. “State Criminal Policy and Questions of Overcoming of the Crisis Events in Criminal Law”. Iuridicheskii vestnik DGU 1: 96–101. (In Russian)

Lapunin, Mikhail M. 2017. “Circumstances Excluding Criminality of Act and Scientific and Technical Progress”. Vestnik Akademii General’noi prokuratury Rossiiskoi Federatsii 6 (62): 81–87. (In Russian)

Matkova, Aleksandra A. 2017. “Why in the Closest 3 Years of Operators in Banks Could Be Replaced by Artificial Intelligence?”. Ekonomika. Pravo. Menedzhment: sovremennye problemy i tendentsii razvitiia 13: 10–18. (In Russian)

Morkhat, Petr M. 2018. “On the Issue of The Compliance of Autonomous Intellectual Weapons Systems to the Principles of International Humanitarian Law”. Vestnik voennogo prava 2: 58–65. (In Russian)

Neff, Gina, Peter Nagy. 2016. “Talking To Bots: Symbiotic Agency and the Case of Tay”. International Journal of Communication 10: 4915–4931.

Norman AI. n. d. Norman. Accessed July 3, 2018. http://norman-ai.mit.edu/.

Ponkin, Igor’ V., Alena I. Red’kina. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence from the Point of View of Law”. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriia: Iuridicheskie nauki 1: 91–109. (In Russian)

Radutniy, Oleksandr E. 2017. “Criminal liability of the artificial intelligence.” Problemi zakonnostі 138: 132–141.

Vedomosti. 2018. “Uber unmanned car caused death to pedestrian because of autopilot settings”. Vedomosti. May 8, 2018. Accessed July 3, 2018. https://www.vedomosti.ru/technology/news/2018/05/08/768916-bespilotnik-uber-sbil. (In Russian)