Закономерности и недостатки технико-юридического закрепления правовых преимуществ в современном российском законодательстве

Артем Григорьевич Репьев; Иван Николаевич Сенякин

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2019.302

Authors

Артем Григорьевич Репьев Barnaul Law Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia, 49, ul. Chkalova, Barnaul, 656038, Russian Federation
Иван Николаевич Сенякин Saratov state legal academy, 1, Volskaya ul., Saratov, 410056, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.302

Abstract

Advantages in rights and legislation, at this stage of development of jurisprudence, have not become subject of conceptual scientific analysis. In this regard, it seems relevant to comprehend forms of their expression in the language of legal documents and the technical and legal features characteristic of acts of federal, regional and municipal levels. The designated purpose of this work was defined as solution of the following scientific and practical tasks: to reveal the developed regularities and the existing shortcomings of legal definiteness in legislation of advantages of some subjects over others; and to define the priority technical and legal directions of optimization of the process of fortifying legal advantages in regulations. The analysis of an array of legislation showed that, despite active use of the constructions “legal advantage”, “advantageous situation” and “privilege”, law-making bodies did not make an attempt to formulate a definition of this basic term, “legal advantage”, to offer a specific and subspecific division. The designated omissions, today, led not only to a synonymy of specific concepts of a system of legal advantages: benefits, privileges, immunity; but also subspecific: compensations, subsidies, grants, etc. The law enforcement official in such a situation, for lack of clear, accurate regulation of legal governance through a system of this sort of permissions of the highest order, is forced to go the way of analogy and interpretation, unfortunately, not always accurately. The authors’ conclusions help to define ways of improving the legislative process, to propose possible solutions of the formed legal collisions and contradictions, and to provide concrete recommendations to improve technical and legal process of solidifying legal advantages in rulemaking language.

Keywords:

legal advantage, legal equipment, exception, estimated concept, privilege, immunity

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Алексеев, Сергей С. 1999. Право: азбука — теория — философия: опыт комплексного исследования. М.: Статут.

Баранов, Владимир М. 2000. «Предисловие». Проблемы юридической техники, под ред. В. М. Баранова. Н. Новгород: НА МВД России: 11–12.

Белоусов, Сергей А. 2015. «Актуальные проблемы сбалансированности системы российского законодательства: в поисках равновесного состояния между унификацией и специализацией». Вопросы экономики и права 86: 7–12.

Белоусов, Сергей А. 2015. «Правотворчество и законодательный дисбаланс: диалектика взаимосвязи». Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия: Право 1: 63–68.

Власенко, Николай А. 2001. Законодательная технология (Теория. Опыт. Правила). Иркутск: Восточно-Сибирская издательская компания.

Власенко, Николай А. 2013. «Кризис права: проблемы и подходы к решению». Журнал российского права 8: 43–54.

Власенко, Николай А. 2007. «Текст юридических документов: методология исследования». Современные методы исследования в правоведении, под ред. Николая И. Матузова, Александра В. Малько. Саратов: СЮИ МВД России: 485–505.

Глухарева, Людмила И. 2010. «Юридическая ответственность как правовая конструкция». Вектор науки Тольяттинского государственного университета. Серия: Юридические науки 3: 44–47.

Иеринг, Рудольф фон. 1905. Юридическая техника. СПб.: Типо-Литография А. Г. Розена.

Карташов, Владимир Н., Сергей В. Бахвалов. 2010. Законодательная технология субъектов Российской Федерации. Ярославль: ЯрГУ.

Кашанина, Татьяна В. 2008. «Логика права как элемент юридической техники». Журнал российского права 2: 25–35.

Колесник, Ирина В. 2014. Теоретическая модель правоприменительной технологии. Дис. … д-ра юрид. наук. Нижегородская академия МВД России.

Кузнецов, В. А. (ред.). 2000. Большой толковый словарь русского языка. СПб.: Норинт.

Субочев, Виталий В. 2008. Законные интересы. М.: Норма.

Суменков, Сергей Ю. 2016. Исключения в праве: теоретико-инструментальный анализ. М.: Юрлитинформ.

References

Alekseev, Sergey S. 1999. Law: ABC-theory-philosophy: experience of complex research. Moscow, Statut Publ.(In Russian)

Baranov, Vladimir M. 2000. “The preface”. Problems of the Legal Equipment, ed. V. M. Baranov. N. Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Russian Interior Ministry Academy Publ.: 11–12. (In Russian)

Belousov, Sergei A. 2015. “Current problems of balance of system of the Russian legislation: in search of an equilibrium state between unification and specialization”. Voprosy ekonomiki i prava 86: 7–12. (In Russian)

Belousov, Sergei A. 2015. “Law-making and legislative imbalance: dialectics of interrelation”. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Pravo 1: 63–68. (In Russian)

Glukhareva, Liudmila I. 2010. “Legal responsibility as legal design”. Vektor nauki Tol’iattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Iuridicheskie nauki 3: 44–47. (In Russian)

Iering, Rudol’f fon. 1905. Legal technique. St. Petersburg: Tipo-Litografiia A. G. Rozena Publ. (In Russian)

Kartashov, Vladimir N., Sergei V. Bakhvalov. 2010. Legislative technology of territorial subjects of the Russian Federation. Iaroslavl’, Yaroslavl State University Publ. (In Russian)

Kashanina, Tat’iana V. 2008. “Logic of the right as element of the legal equipment”. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 2: 25–35. (In Russian)

Kolesnik, Irina V. 2014. Theoretical model of law-enforcement technology. PhD diss., Nizhniy Novgorod academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia. (In Russian)

Kuznetsov, V. A. (ed.). 2000. Russian big explanatory dictionary. St. Petersburg, Norint Publ. (In Russian)

Subochev, Vitalii V. 2008. Legitimate interests. Moscow, Norma Publ. (In Russian)

Sumenkov, Sergei Iu. 2016. Law exceptions: the theoretic-instrumental analysis. Moscow, Iurlitinform Publ.(In Russian)

Vlasenko, Nikolai A. 2001. Legislative technology (Theory. Experience. Rules). Irkutsk, Vostochno-Sibirskaia izdatel’skaia kompaniia. (In Russian)

Vlasenko, Nikolai A. 2013. “Right crisis: problems and approaches to the decision”. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 8: 43–54. (In Russian)

Vlasenko, Nikolai A. 2007. “Text of legal documents: research methodology”. Modern methods of a research in jurisprudence, eds Nikolai I. Matuzov, Aleksandra V. Mal’ko. Saratov, Saratov legal institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Publ.: 485–505. (In Russian)