Влияние трансформации системы правосудия на обеспечение независимости судей, прокуроров и следователей

Sergey A. Bochkarev

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2020.306

Authors

Sergey A. Bochkarev Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 10, ul. Znamenka, Moscow, 119019, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.306

Abstract

The article examines the transformation processes of the domestic justice system over the past thirty years. The influence of structurally applied modifications of the system on its intangible aspects (independence, internal conviction, freedom of assessment, etc.), contributing to the administration and achievement of justice, is evaluated. Particular attention is paid to the study of the impact of justice reforms on the independence of its institutions and representatives because without guarantees and a state of independence, justice loses its meaning and turns into its opposite. According to the results of the study, it was revealed that organizational and structural measures to ensure the independence of the main subjects of legal proceedings were not complex, individual, and local in nature. The restructuring of the investigating authorities and the prosecutor’s office in 2007–2019, as well as the modification of the judicial system, were aimed at minimizing interdepartmental and interinstitutional dependence. However, the transformations did not affect the aspect of ensuring intra-departmental and intra-institutional independence of their subjects. As a result, the administrative dependence of an ordinary employee of the justice system in regard to his immediate supervisor remained at the same level. An assessment of the shortcomings of the reform made it possible to predict that the structuring of the justice system in the short and medium term will not lead to increased independence of investigators, prosecutors, and judges as a key and expected result. Ultimately, it will be reflected in the fact that for a long time these representatives did not subordinate to the law, but conversely they were placed in a position controlled by higher management and taught to properly comply with requirements.

Keywords:

independence of justice, transformation of the justice system, law enforcement agencies, independence, judge, investigator, prosecutor, restructuring, reform

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Бородина, Татьяна И., Игорь Н. Носс. 2018. «Экспериментальное обоснование личностно-профессиональной спецификации в диагностике характерологических особенностей государственных служащих». Психология и право 8 (1): 128–146. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2018080110

Бочкарёв, Сергей А. 2019. «Состояние независимости институтов правосудия в Российской Федерации: социологическое исследование». Российский журнал правовых исследований 1 (18): 9–24.

Гончарова, Наталья А., Ирина В. Костылева. 2018. «Психологические особенности аксиологической надежности сотрудников органов внутренних дел на различных стадиях профессиогенеза». Психология и право 8 (3): 25–33. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2018080302.

Попова, Татьяна В., Анна С. Калашникова. 2018. «Научно-практические рекомендации по профилактике эмоционального выгорания у судей». Психология и право 8 (1): 119–127. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2018080109.

Резапкина, Галина В., Ирина А. Федосеева. 2017. «Что такое ответственность: от диагностики к развитию». Вестник практической психологии образования 1: 42–48.

Смирнов, Александр В. 2019. «О независимости, беспристрастности и справедливости судебной власти». Российский журнал правовых исследований 1 (18): 25–31.

Цветков, Юрий А. 2019. «Независимость судей в механизме управления судебной системой». Российский журнал правовых исследований 1 (18): 73–88.

Шадрин, Виктор С. 2019. «Обеспечение независимости судей как одно из оснований реформы судебной системы». Российский журнал правовых исследований 1 (18): 32–37.

References

Bochkarev, Sergei A. 2019. “State of independence of justice institutions in the Russian Federation: a sociological study”. Rossiiskii zhurnal pravovykh issledovanii 1 (18): 9–24. (In Russian)

Borodina, Tatyana I., Igor N. Noss. 2018. “Experimental study of the personal and professional specifications in the diagnosis of characteristic features of state employees”. Psikhologiia i pravo 8 (1): 128–146. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2018080110. (In Russian)

Goncharova, Natalya A., Irina V. Kostyleva. 2018. “Psychological peculiarities of axiological reliability employees of internal affairs bodies at various stages of professiogenesis”. Psikhologiia i pravo 8 (3): 25–33. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2018080302. (In Russian)

Popova, Tatyana V., Anna S. Kalashnikova. 2018. “Scientific and practical recommendations for the prevention of emotional burnout in judges”. Psikhologiia i pravo 8 (1): 119–127. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2018080109. (In Russian)

Rezapkina, Galina V., Irina A. Fedoseeva. 2017. “What is responsibility: from diagnosis to development”. Vestnik prakticheskoi psikhologii obrazovaniia 1: 42–48. (In Russian)

Shadrin, Viktor S. 2019. “Ensuring the independence of judges as one of the grounds for judicial reform”. Rossiiskii zhurnal pravovykh issledovanii 1 (18): 32–37. (In Russian)

Smirnov, Alexander V. 2019. “On the independence, impartiality and fairness of the judiciary”. Rossiiskii zhurnal pravovykh issledovanii 1 (18): 25–31. (In Russian)

Tsvetkov, Yuri A. 2019. “Independence of judges in the judicial system management mechanism”. Rossiiskii zhurnal pravovykh issledovanii 1 (18): 73–88. (In Russian)