Новые тенденции и особенности развития системы гражданского процессуального права Китая

Gong Nan

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2020.114

Authors

Gong Nan Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, 7989, Wai Qingsong Road, Qingpu District, Shanghai, China; Heilongjiang University, 74, Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin, China https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5759-7408

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.114

Abstract

The amendment of the Civil Procedure Law in 2012 and the introduction of the latest judicial interpretation of civil procedure in 2014 represent yet another effort at modernizing this body of law in China. The reform of the CPC corresponds to the trends in the internationalization of the civil process. Its key position is the constitutionalization of the right to claim, which specifies the theory of “access to justice.” In order to more effectively ensure “the right of citizens to access justice,” the future judicial reform should be aimed at a closer systematization and coordination of the structure of civil proceedings. The definition of “ensuring the right to claim” as the supreme goal of the CPC of the PRC is a necessary basis for improving legislation, as well as the most urgent task of impartial justice. The reform conforms to the trend of constitutionalization and internationalization of the protection of litigation rights, as well as serves as the specific embodiment of the concept of “Access to Justice” in the process of judicial reform. In order to protect people’s “right to a fair trial” more effectively, much more attention will be paid to the integrity and overall planning of the design of the Law in the future so as to enhance the transformation of all aspects involved. Therefore, setting “the protection of litigation rights” as the supreme goal of Civil Procedure Law is not only the necessary foundation for refining legislation, but also the primary task of achieving judicial justice.

Keywords:

the Civil Procedure Law, the protection of litigation right, Access to Justice, judicial reform

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

齐树洁：《论我国民事诉讼法的未来发展》,《河南财经政法大学学报》2014年第5期，第1–13页。[Ци,Шуцзе. 2014. «О будущем развитии гражданского процессуального права в Китае». Вестник Хайнаньского университета экономики, политики и права 5: 1–13].

张卫平：《改革开放以来民事诉讼制度的变迁》, 《人民检察》, 2019 年第1期，第33–40页。 [Чжан,Вэйпин. 2019. «Развитие гражданского судопроизводства после осуществления политики открытости и реформы». Народный надзор 1: 33–40].

曹莉：《公正解决纠纷:司法体制改革下民事诉讼目的之定位》,《南通大学学报 (社会科学版)》,2018年第10期，第65–71页。 [Сао, Ли. 2018. «Ориентировка цели гражданского судопроизводства в рамках судебной реформы: справедливое разрешение споров». Вестник Нантунского университета (гуманитарная наука) 10: 65–71].

江国华; 张彬：《检察机关提起民事公益诉讼的现实困境与完善路径》,《河南财经政法大学学报》,2017年第7期，第85–93页。 [Чзян, Гохуа, Чжан Бин. 2017. «Путь совершенствования и проблемы судопроизводства при обращении с исками в защиту общественных интересов прокурором». Вестник Хайнаньского университета экономики, политики и права 7: 85–93].

何其生：《大国司法理念与中国国际民事诉讼制度的发展》,《中国社会科学》, 2017年第5期，第123–146页。 [Хэ, Цишин. 2017. «Развитие китайского международного гражданского судопроизводства в рамках концепции о правосудии в державе». Китайская гуманитарная наука 5:123–146].

张曦：《立案制度改革中民事诉讼公正与效率的价值博弈》,《河南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》,2015年第12期，第109–112页。 [Чжан, Си. 2015. «Борьба ценности в справедливости и эффективности гражданского процесса в рамках изменения института предъявления иска». Вестник Хайнаньского университета науки и техники (гуманитарная наука) 12: 109–112].

冯珂：《从权利保障到权力制约: 论我国民事诉讼模式转换的趋向》,《当代法学》, 2016 年第5期，第27–37页。 [Фэн, Кэ. 2016. «Тенденция трансформации модели гражданского судопроизводства в Китае: с обеспечения права до ограничения власти». Современное правоведение 6: 27–37].

References

Cao, Li. 2018. “Fair settlement of disputes: definition of the purpose of civil procedure under the reform of the judicial system”. Nán tōnɡ dà xué xué bào (shè huì kē xué bǎn) 10: 65–71. (In Chinese)

Feng, Ke. 2016. “From right protection to power restriction: on the trend of the transformation of civil procedure mode in China”. Dānɡ dài fǎ xué 5: 27–37. (In Chinese)

He, Qisheng. 2017. “The judicial philosophy of great powers and the development of China’s international civil procedure system”. Zhōnɡ ɡuó shè huì kē xué 5: 123–146. (In Chinese)

Jiang, Guohua, Zhang Bin. 2017. “The practical dilemma and improvement of civil public interest litigation initiated by procuratorial organs”. Hé nán cái jīnɡ zhènɡ fǎ dà xué xué bào 7: 85–93. (In Chinese)

Qi, Shujie. 2014. “On the future development of China’s civil procedure law”. Hé nán cái jīnɡ zhènɡ fǎ dà xué xué bào 5: 1–13. (In Chinese)

Zhang, Xi. 2015. “The value game between justice and efficiency of civil procedure in the reform of filing system”. Hé nán kē jì dà xué xué bào (shè huì kē xué bǎn) 12: 109–112. (In Chinese)

Zhang, Weiping. 2019. “Changes of civil litigation system since the reform and opening up”. Rén mín jiǎn chá 1: 33–40. (In Chinese)