Судебный нормоконтроль в гражданском и арбитражном процессе: современное состояние и пути совершенствования

Владимир Владимирович Ярков; Игорь Николаевич Спицин

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2018.407

Authors

Владимир Владимирович Ярков Ural State Law University, ul. Komsomol’skaya, 21, Ekaterinburg, 620137, Russian Federation
Игорь Николаевич Спицин Ural State Law University, ul. Komsomol’skaya, 21, Ekaterinburg, 620137, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2018.407

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of judicial contesting of normative acts in civil procedure, its types, nature and correlation. There are two types of judicial contesting of normative acts in Russia – abstract and casual. First of them is implemented in administrative justice, second is in civil and administrative justice. Abstract judicial contesting of normative acts should be considered as a universal mechanism for checking the legality of the normative act, implemented in administrative justice proceedings. On the contrary, casual contesting of normative acts is exercised both in administrative and civil judicial proceedings and is essentially part of the procedure for the court to choose the rule of positive law to be applied in a particular case, the direct subject of which is not the verification of the legitimacy of the normative act. The competence of the courts, in any case, to assess the normative act for its compliance with the normative act of greater legal force lies not so much in the key of judicial contesting of normative acts, as in the sphere of implementation of judicial discretion in the choice of applicable law. The authors criticize the abstract type of judicial contesting of normative acts in relation to the limitation of the range of its objects to the limits of the operation of the normative act in time. In accordance with the principles of civil and administrative justice, the authors argue that normative acts that have lost their force at the time of application to the court should relate to the objects of judicial contestation.

Keywords:

judicial contesting of normative acts, administrative judicial proceedings, civil procedure, access to justice

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Алексеев, Сергей С. 1999. Право: азбука — теория — философия: опыт комплексного исследования. М.: Статут.

Алексеев, Сергей С. 1982. Общая теория права. Т. II. М.: Юридическая литература.

Вершинин, Александр П. 1998. Способы защиты гражданских прав в суде. Дис. … д-ра юрид. наук. Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет.

Вершинин, Александр П. 2000. Выбор способа защиты гражданских прав. СПб.: Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета.

Ильин, Андрей В. 2017. «Конституционные основания осуществления нормоконтроля в гражданском процессе и предмет судебной деятельности». Вестник гражданского процесса 2: 31–46.

Нешатаева, Татьяна Н. 2007. «Формирование единообразной судебной практики и возможности введения процедуры преюдициального запроса в процессуальное законодательство России». Законодательство 5: 52–55.

References

Alekseyev, Sergey S. 1999. Pravo: azbuka — teoriia — filosofiia: opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniia [Law: ABC-theory-philosophy: experience of complex research]. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Alekseyev, Sergey S. 1982. Obshchaia teoriia prava [General theory of law]. Vol. II. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura Publ. (In Russian)

Vershinin, Aleksandr P. 1998. Sposoby zashchity grazhdanskikh prav v sude [Methods of protection of civil rights in court]. Dr. Law Sc. diss. St. Petersburg State University Publ. (In Russian)

Vershinin, Aleksandr P. 2000. Vybor sposoba zashchity grazhdanskikh prav [The choice of the method of protection of civil rights]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press. (In Russian)

Iljin, Andrey V. 2007. “Konstitutsionnye osnovaniia osushchestvleniia normokontrolia v grazhdanskom protsesse i predmet sudebnoi deiatel’nosti” [“Constitutional Foundation for the implementation of compliance assessment in civil litigation and subject to judicial activity”]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Herald of civil process] 2: 31–46. (In Russian)

Neshataeva, Tayiana N. 2007. “Formirovanie edinoobraznoi sudebnoi praktiki i vozmozhnosti vvedeniia protsedury preiuditsial’nogo zaprosa v protsessual’noe zakonodatel’stvo Rossii” [“The formation of uniform court practice and the possibility of introduction of procedure of prejudicial request to the procedural law of Russia”]. Zakonodatel’stvo [The Legislation] 5: 52–55. (In Russian)