Percent rate of a reward of insolvency officer

Authors

  • Кристина Владимировна Дранцова St. Petersburg State University, 7/9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

Abstract

The present article is devoted to the order of the establishment and payment of percentage on a reward to the insolvency officer. Even though the order of their calculation is established by the law, court practice faces a set of problems. The author covered some problems arising in court practice in connection with their calculation: in particular, the question of how we determine the actual value of the debtor's assets when calculating the percent of temporary or administrative officer, whether the requirement of creditors repaid by the agreement on a compensation or by offset of counter uniform requirements is to be taken into account when calculating percents on a reward for the bankruptcy manager; the author considers the bases for reduction of this type of reward, and also cases when the courts might refuse their payment. The solution of the specified questions represents not only theoretical, but also practical interest for all mechanism of bankruptcy of the debtor in general, because the quality of the procedure of bankruptcy directly depends on the quality of work of insolvency officer, therefore the reward of his services has to be stimulating for good work. Refs 4.

Keywords:

bankruptcy (insolvency), insolvency officer, reward, percents on a reward, register of requirements of creditors

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Источники и литература

Зайцев О. Р. Вознаграждение арбитражного управляющего. Новые разъяснения ВАС РФ // Арбитражная практика. 2014. № 2. С. 72–79.

Фролов И. В. Юридические механизмы вознаграждения арбитражных управляющих: процесс становления и их правовая природа // Законы России. Опыт. Анализ. Практика. 2011. № 11. С. 88–94.

Гришаев С. П., Овчинникова А. В. Эволюция правового регулирования института банкротства // http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=CMB;n=17591 (дата обращения: 15.10.2015).

Карелина С. А., Эрлих М. Е. Роль арбитражного управляющего в механизме разрешения конфликта интересов // Право и экономика. Документы. Комментарии. Практика. 2012. № 3. С. 19–25.

References

Zaitsev R. O. Voznagrazhdenie arbitrazhnogo upravliaiushchego. Novye raz"iasneniia VAS RF [The reward of the of insolvency officer. New explanations of the SAC]. Arbitrazhnaia praktika [Arbitration practice], 2014, no. 2, pp. 72–79. (In Russian)

Frolov L. V. Iuridicheskie mekhanizmy voznagrazhdeniia arbitrazhnykh upravliaiushchikh: protsess stanovleniia i ikh pravovaia priroda [The legal mechanisms of arbitration managers’ reward: the process of formation and their legal nature]. Zakony Rossii. Opyt. Analiz. Praktika [Laws of Russia. Experience. Analysis. Practice], 2011, no. 11, pp. 88–94. (In Russian)

Grishaev S. P., Ovchinnikova A. V. Evoliutsiia pravovogo regulirovaniia instituta bankrotstva [The evolution of legal regulation of the institution of bankruptcy]. ATP “ConsultantPlus”. 2014. Available at: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=CMB;n=17591 (accessed 15.10.2015).

Karelina S. A., Erlikh M. E. Rol' arbitrazhnogo upravliaiushchego v mekhanizme razresheniia konflikta interesov [Insolvency officers’ role in resolving conflicts of interest]. Pravo i ekonomika. Dokumenty. Kommentarii. Praktika [Law and Economics. Documents. Comments. Practice], 2012, no. 3, pp. 19–25. (In Russian)

Published

2016-05-10

How to Cite

Дранцова, К. В. (2016). Percent rate of a reward of insolvency officer. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, (1), 97–105. Retrieved from https://lawjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/2750

Issue

Section

Commercial law

Most read articles by the same author(s)