Соотношение гражданско-правового и уголовно-правового регулирования имущественных отношений на примере квалификации сделок, совершенных под влиянием обмана, насилия и угроз

Сергей Михайлович Оленников

doi:10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.308

Authors

Сергей Михайлович Оленников St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.308

Abstract

The article deals with a comparative analysis of the regulation of property relations of civil and criminal law. The subject of the study is the legislation and judicial practice in terms of the qualification of transactions made under the influence of deception of violence and threats. As a result of the analysis, conclusions were drawn that transactions are outside the civil-law regulation of property relations if they are carried out concerning objects that are limited in a turnover or are a way of punishable infringement of another’s property. In cases where criminal-legal prohibitions are aimed at the protection of other relations (principles of lending, freedom of contract, the established procedure for carrying out entrepreneurial activities, etc.), the transactions concluded must be deemed valid and annulled in accordance with the procedure provided for by civil law. On the basis of examples it is possible to stipulate criteria for resolving the issue of when a transaction mentioned in the description of criminal conduct in a criminal law falls outside the scope of civil law regulation, and when it can be deemed valid can only be revoked based on the provisions of the Russian Civil Code. The actions of citizens and legal entities, executed in the form of transactions, are outside the Civil Law of property relations if they are carried out concerning objects (goods and services) that are limited in a turnover or are a way of punishable infringement of another`s property. In cases where criminal-legal prohibitions are aimed at the protection of other relations (freedom of contract, the established procedure for carrying out entrepreneurial activities, etc.), the transactions concluded must be deemed valid and annulled in accordance with the procedure provided for Civil Law.

Keywords:

civil law, criminal law, transaction, deception, fraud, violence, threats

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Бойцов, Александр И. 2002. Преступления против собственности. СПб.: Юридический центр «Пресс».

Безверхов, Артур Г., Анна И. Розенцвайг. 2012. «Мошенничество и сделка, совершенная под влиянием обмана: конкуренция или совокупность?» Уголовное право 3: 8–14.

Долинская, Владимира В., Ирина В. Шишко. 2017. «Обманные действия по ст. 179 Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации и ст. 165 Уголовного кодекса Российской Федерации». Актуальные проблемы российского права 3: 127–142.

Новицкий, Иван Б. 1954. Сделки. Исковая давность. М.: Госюриздат.

Прохоров, Вадим С., Николай М. Кропачев, Алексей Н. Тарбагаев. 1989. Механизм уголовно-правового регулирования: норма, правоотношение, ответственность. Красноярск: Изд-во Красноярского ун-та.

Скловский, Константин И. 2010. Собственность в гражданском праве. М.: Статут.

Таганцев, Николай С. 1902. Курс уголовного права. СПб.: Государственная типография.

Фойницкий, Иван Я. 1871. Мошенничество по действующему русскому праву. СПб.: Типография товарищества «Общественная польза».

References

Bezverkhov, Arthur G., Anna I. Rozentsvaig. 2012. “Moshennichestvo i sdelka, sovershennaia pod vliianiem obmana: konkurentsiia ili sovokupnost’?” [“Fraud and Transaction Made Under the Influence of Deception: Competition or Set of Offenses?”]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law] 3: 8–14. (In Russian)

Boitsov, Alexander I. 2002. Prestupleniia protiv sobstvennosti [Crimes against ownership]. St. Petersburg: Iuridicheskii tsentr “Press”.(In Russian)

Dolinskaja, Vladimira V., Irina V. Shishko. 2017. “Obmannye deistviia po st. 179 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii i st. 165 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii” [“Fraudulent Actions Under Article 179 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and Article 165 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation”]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava [Actual problems of Russian law] 3: 127–142.(In Russian)

Foynitsky, Ivan Ya. 1871. Moshennichestvo po deistvuiushchemu russkomu pravu [Fraud on Russian Law]. St.Petersburg: Tipografiia tovarishchestva “Obshchestvennaia pol’za”.(In Russian)

Novitsky, Ivan B. 1954. Sdelki. Iskovaia davnost’ [Limitation of actions]. Moscow: Gosiurizdat.(In Russian)

Prohorov, Vadim S., Nikolai M. Kropachev, Alexey N. Tarbagaev. 1989. Mekhanizm ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniia: norma, pravootnoshenie, otvetstvennost’ [Mechanism of Criminal Law Regulation: Norm, Legal Relationship, Responsibility]. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State University Publ. (In Russian)

Sklovsky, Konstantin I. 2010. Sobstvennost’ v grazhdanskom prave [Property in Civil Law]. Moscow: Statut.(In Russian)

Tagantsev, Nikolai S. 1902. Kurs ugolovnogo prava [Course of Criminal Law]. St. Petersburg: State Publ.(In Russian)