Constitutional adjudication in the taxation area: А level of involvement and ways of improvement of effectiveness

Authors

  • Евгений Васильевич Тарибо Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, 1, Senatskaya sq., St. Petersburg, 190000, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.305

Abstract

The article considers the issues related to the participation of constitutional justice in resolving  problems of tax legislation and enforcement. The author points out the need to analyse the causes and conditions leading to decrease or, conversely, to increase the involvement of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the sphere of taxation. Among the factors contributing to the growth of conflict in the tax sphere, the author points out: untimely changes in the tax legislation, inadequate activity of the cassation courts, and an excessively fiscal bias in the activities of executive bodies. These factors influence the growth of the number of tax cases considered within the framework of constitutional justice. The article argues that the influence of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the taxation sphere can be implemented not only by adopting decisions on the acutest issues of the legislation on taxes and fees. The article suggests that the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation could use other means for this purpose: sending incoming complaints on jurisdiction to other courts, as well as the institution of addresses to the Federal Assembly.

Keywords:

constitutional adjudication, taxation, tax disputes, effectiveness of adjudication, issues of jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, addresses of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Брежнев, Олег В. 2014. «Институт послания Конституционного Суда законодательному органу власти: проблемы теории и практики». Российская юстиция 9: 42–45.

Пепеляев, Сергей Г. 2013. Компенсация расходов на правовую помощь в арбитражных судах. М.: Альпина Паблишер.

Петрухин, Игорь Л., Гений П. Батуров, Тамара Г. Морщакова. 1979. Теоретические основы эффективности правосудия. М.: Наука.

Щекин, Денис М. 2016. «О кризисе правосудия по налоговым спорам». Закон 10: 28–34.

Библиография

Brezhnev, Oleg V. 2014. “Institut poslaniia Konstitutsionnogo Suda zakonodatel’nomu organu vlasti: problemy teorii i praktiki” [“Institute of the message of the Constitutional Court to the legislative authority: problems of theory and practice”]. Rossiiskaia iustitsiia [The Russian Justice] 9: 42–45.(In Russian)

Pepelyaev, Sergey G. 2013. Kompensatsiia raskhodov na pravovuiu pomoshch’ v arbitrazhnykh sudakh [Reimbursement of costs for legal services in arbitrazh courts]. Moscow: Alpina Pablisher.(In Russian)

Petrukhin, Igor L., Geniy P. Baturov, Tamara G. Morshchakova. 1979. Teoreticheskie osnovy effektivnosti pravosudiia[Theoretical basis of the effectiveness of justice]. Moscow: Science.(In Russian)

Shchekin, Denis M. 2016. “O krizise pravosudiia po nalogovym sporam” [“On the crisis of justice in tax disputes”]. Zakon [Law] 10: 28–34.(In Russian)

Published

2018-08-19

How to Cite

Тарибо, Е. В. (2018). Constitutional adjudication in the taxation area: А level of involvement and ways of improvement of effectiveness. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 9(3), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.305

Issue

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research