Remote electronic voting in elections in Russia: State, problems, prospects

Authors

  • Elena N. Bosova Ufa University of Science and Technology https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4888-7424
  • Alla A. Chechulina Ufa University of Science and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.309

Abstract

The paper examines the Russian experience of introducing remote electronic voting into the electoral process. By referring to the experience of other countries, we highlight the positive and negative aspects of remote electronic voting. The interest of states therein is due to the capability of combating the electorate absenteeism at polling stations for voting. Along with
that, the results of surveying Russians on the use of remote electronic voting in elections show
that some voters do not trust the outcomes of such voting for fear of fraud. We accumulated preferential provisions that constitute the interest of states in remote electronic voting. Blockchain
technologies used in electronic voting are diverse and affect the public’s attitude to the voting results in different ways, many electoral process participants do not understand the technical component of the electronic program. Russia uses a closed blockchain, therefore
only the electoral process participants having a special key can view the data. It turned out that
blockchain-based voting does not solve fundamental security problems, but on the contrary
is technically more vulnerable than traditional paper ballot voting or postal voting. In Russia, legal regulation relates more to the technical aspects of organizing and implementing remote electronic voting in elections, but does not solve all the problems, leaving many gaps for the guarantees of citizens’ electoral rights. Currently, the optimal model will be the combination of both traditional (paper ballot) and remote voting forms in order to reduce the risks of the latter, i. e. to apply a hybrid voting format in elections. Russian electoral legislation needs to be
adapted to the hybrid format of elections with a paper ballot and an electronic ballot, providing voting rights of citizens and remote electronic voting.

Keywords:

blockchain, ballot, elections, voting, remote voting, egislation, voters, secret ballot, electoral fraud, electronic voting

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

References

Antonov, Yaroslav V. 2011. “International experience of electronic voting”. Sbornik konkursnykh rabot v oblasti izbiratel’nogo prava i izbiratel’nogo protsessa vypolnennykh studentami, aspirantami v 2010/2011 uchebnom godu, 43–60. Moscow, RTsOIT Publ. (In Russian)

Bosova, Elena N. 2023. “Secret expression of the will of voters: Traditional and remote”. Vestnik Instituta prava Bashkirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 1 (17): 27–33. https://doi.org/10.33184/vest-lawbsu-2023.17.3 (In Russian)

Bosova, Elena N., Dmitrij A. Reut. 2019. “Remote electronic voting: Search for legislative formalization”. Pravoprimenenie 3: 53–62. https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2019.3(3).53-62 (In Russian)

Chechulina, Alla A. 2020. “The concept of judicial law: Russian context”. Amazonia Investiga 9 (25): 223–229.

Connolly, Nicholas. 2022. Issues with Electronic Voting. Accessed August 6, 2024. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252859151_Issues_with_Electronic_Voting.

Liebkind, Joe. 2020. “How blockchain technology can prevent voter fraud”. Investopedia. Accessed August 6, 2024. https://www.investopedia.com/news/how-blockchain-technology-can-prevent-voter-fraud.

Lielacher, Alex. 2018. “How blockchain could secure elections”. CBINSIGHTS. Accessed August 6, 2024. https://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/blockchain-election-security.

Marlow, Burns. 2017. “Fundamental, unequivocal, yet unreliable: The interplay of voting, electronic voting systems, and trade secrets in today’s interconnected world”. Journal of Intellectual Property Law 24 (2): 381–415. Accessed August 6, 2024. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/jipl/vol24/iss2/7.

Paul, Chima. 2022. “Transiting from manual voting to electronic voting system for enduring democratic governance in Nigeria: The imperative for digital remedy”. Journal of Technology Innovations and Energy 1 (1): 9–18. https://doi.org/10.56556/jtie.v1i1.131

Pollock, Darryn. 2018. “Blockchain for elections: Advantages, cases, challenges”. Cointelegraph. Accessed August 6, 2024. https://cointelegraph.com/news/blockchain-for-elections-advantages-cases-challenges.

Sinoo, Park, Michael Specter, Neha Narula, Ronald L. Rivest. 2020. Going from Bad to Worse: From Internet Voting to Blockchain Voting. Report by MIT Specialists. November 6, 2020 (DRAFT). Accessed August 6, 2024. https://people.csail.mit.edu/rivest/pubs/PSNR20.pdf.

Tasmia Alvi, Syada, Nasir Uddin Mohammed, Islam Linta, Ahamed Sajib. 2022. “DVT chain: A blockchainbased decentralized mechanism to ensure the security of digital voting system”. Journal of King Saud University — Computer and Information Sciences 34 (9): 6855–6871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.06.014

Volkamer, Melanie. 2009. “Implementations of electronic voting”. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 30. Accessed August 6, 2024. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251203082_Implementations_of_Electronic_Voting.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-14

How to Cite

Bosova, E. N., & Chechulina, A. A. (2024). Remote electronic voting in elections in Russia: State, problems, prospects. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 15(3), 684–691. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.309

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 3 (2024)

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.