Perjury: problems of criminal law regulation of subjective signs, complicity and punishment established for a crime
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.105Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of directions for improving the norm governing criminal liability for perjury. The relevance of the research topic is due to the stability of the indicators of these acts, as well as the importance and diversity of social relations that suffer from their commission. The authors analyzed 230 court verdicts issued in connection with the commission of an act under Art. 307 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The results of the analysis were compared with the opinions of scientists and foreign experience of legal counteraction to perjury. The study of sentences made it possible to identify the most common motives for the crime, including selfish motives. The article substantiates the expediency of including this feature in Part 2 of Art. 307 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, since it increases the social danger of a crime. In addition, the analysis of sentences made it possible to identify 42 episodes (18.2%) in which false testimony or conclusions of participants in the process indirectly testified to the presence of collusion. Since many facts of perjury that reinforce each other reduce the likelihood of their detection and increase the likelihood of making an erroneous decision, it is proposed to consolidate the forms of complicity in Part 2 of Art. 307 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation as qualifying signs. The authors also provide a justification for the fact that the sanctions established for giving false testimony do not contribute to the effective protection of protected relations. The main drawback is the lack of consistency with other norms. The article proposes to arrange among themselves the sanctions provided for the commission of related crimes. The wording of the relevant article has been formulated, which can be used as a recommendation for improving legislation.
Keywords:
perjury, justice, selfish motive, sanction, complicity, witness
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Библиография
Гарипов, Тимур И. 2015. «Об уголовной ответственности свидетеля и потерпевшего за заведомо ложные показания». Закон и право 4: 92–93.
Гельдибаев, Мовлад Х. 2020. «Уголовно-правовая характеристика преступлений против правосудия». Уголовная политика и правоприменительная практика: мат-лы VII Междунар. науч.-практ. конф., 158–163. СПб.: Астерион.
Дубинин, Лев. Г. 2012. «Мотивы заведомо ложных показаний свидетеля и потерпевшего». Российский следователь 16: 28–32.
Затона, Роман Е. 2018. «Об ответственности эксперта и специалиста как об межотраслевой проблеме российского законодательства». Уголовное право в эволюционирующем обществе: проблемы и перспективы: сб. науч. ст., 227–231. Курск: Юго-Западный государственный университет.
Косякова, Наталья С. 2001. «Лжесвидетельство». Государство и право 4: 67–68.
Кудрявцев, Дмитрий С. 2019. «Преодоление противодействия раскрытию и расследованию преступлений в Республике Беларусь» . Дис. … канд. юрид. наук, Московский университет Министерства внутренних дел РФ им. В. Я. Кикотя.
Кулева, Людмила О. 2019. «Учет категорий преступлений при конструировании составов преступлений и санкций за их совершение в УК РФ». Вестник Ярославского государственного университета. Сер. Гуманитарные науки 3: 72–75.
Леонтьев, Дмитрий А. 2016. «Понятие мотива у А. Н. Леонтьева и проблема качества мотивации». Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 14. Психология 2: 3–18.
Лихолетов, Александр А., Анна А. Победнова. 2021. «Проблемы применения нормы об уголовной ответственности за заведомо ложные показание, заключение эксперта или специалиста или неправильный перевод». Вестник Волгоградской академии МВД России 3 (58): 79–85.
Мисник, Ирина В., Алексей В. Данеев. 2019. «Ложные показания свидетеля: мотивы и тактика изобличения». Криминалистика: вчера, сегодня, завтра 3 (11): 66–70.
Морхат, Петр М. 2019. Искусственный интеллект: референтная судебная практика. М.: Юнити-Дана.
Музыченко, Павел Б., Александр Д. Трегуб. 2020. «Проблемы, возникающие в сфере дачи заведомо ложных показаний, заключений эксперта, специалиста или неправильного перевода». Современные проблемы уголовного права и процесса: сб. науч. тр. 60-й студен. науч.-практ. конф., 121–123. Хабаровск: Тихоокеанский государственный университет.
Пикин, Иван В., Михаил И. Ключников, Екатерина С. Барехова. 2020. «Заведомо ложный донос и заведомо ложные показания, заключение эксперта, специалиста или неправильный перевод: актуальные проблемы и пути их решения». Право и практика 4: 145–149.
Рябчиков, Сергей. А. 2021. «Лжесвидетельство: спорные вопросы привлечения и освобождения от уголовной ответственности». Вестник Уфимского юридического института МВД России 2 (92): 84–88.
Тарасова, Юлия В. 2006. «Специальный субъект преступления и его значение в уголовном праве». Дис. … канд. юрид. наук, Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт МВД России.
Тихонова, Светлана С. 2008. Юридическая техника в уголовном праве. Нижний Новгород: Деком.
Цепелев, Константин В. 2018. «Заведомо ложный донос и заведомо ложные показание, заключение эксперта, специалиста или неправильный перевод: уголовно-правовая характеристика и проблемы квалификации». Дис. … канд. юрид. наук, Университет прокуратуры РФ.
Bassey, Okpa U., Amadi A. Miracle, Ndubueze E. Lene. 2020. “Rethinking the basis and relevance of the Law of Perjury: A pathway to its resuscitation”. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 3 (3): 68–78.
Budiană, Georgeta-Raluca. 2021. “Considerations on the material element of the objective side of the offense of ‘perjury’ from the perspective of the witness”. Revista de Stiinte Politice 71: 111–120.
Chin, Gabriel J., Scott C. Wells. 1997. “The blue wall of silence as evidence of bias and motive to lie: A new approach to police perjury”. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 59: 233–299.
Crank, Stephanie D., Drew A. Curtis. 2023. “And nothing but the truth: An exploration of perjury”. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 38 (1): 83–92.
Doyle, Charles. 2018. False statements and perjury: An overview of Federal Criminal Law. Accessed July 30, 2022. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/98-808.pdf.
Dunkle, Samuel. 2021. “‘The air was blue with perjury’: Police lies and the case for abolition”. New York University Law Review 96 (2): 2048–2093.
Ekman, Paul. 1985. “Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage” . New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Gorunescu, Mirela. 2019. “Issues of controversial practice referring to the crime of false testimony”. Lex ET Scientia International Journal 26: 116–123.
Heywood, Rob. 2014. “Hillsborough: Legal culpability in the aftermath of the findings of the Independent Panel”. Northern Ireland Legal Qqarterly 65 (1): 101–119.
Iancu, Elena-Ana. 2020. “Theoretical and practical aspects regarding the investigation of the criminal offence of false testimony”. Athens Journal of Law 6 (4): 323–338.
Neuschatz, Jeffrey S., Danielle K. DeLoach, Megan A. Hillgartne, Melanie B. Fessinger, Stacy A. Wetmore, Amy B. Douglass, Brian H. Bornstein, Alexis M. Le Grand. 2021. “The truth about snitches: An archival analysis of informant testimony”. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 28 (4): 508–530.
Saint Sernin, Jean, Baptiste Javary. 2017. “L’exigence de sincerite du temoignage devant la commission d’enquete parlementaire: l’affaire Aubier”. Constitutions: revue de droit constitutionnel applique. Accessed July 29, 2022. https://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/UNIV-PARIS10/hal-03226873v1.
Schmidt, Sibylle. 2017. “Perpetrators’ knowledge: What and how can we learn from perpetrator testimony?” Journal of Perpetrator Research 1 (1): 85–104.
Skoczeń, Izabela. 2022. “Modelling perjury: Between trust and blame”. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Semiotique juridique 35 (2): 771–805.
Tonry, Michael. 2017. “Making American sentencing just, humane, and effective”. Crime and Justice 46 (1): 441–504.
Zahoor, Rashida, Muhammad F. Anwar, Muhammad A. Safdar, Jibran Jamshed. 2020. “A comparative study of perjury in legal system of Pakistan and Islamic law”. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies 6 (4): 1571–1579.
References
Bassey, Okpa U., Amadi A. Miracle, Ndubueze E. Lene. 2020. “Rethinking the basis and relevance of the Law of Perjury: A pathway to its resuscitation”. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 3 (3): 68–78.
Budiană, Georgeta-Raluca. 2021. “Considerations on the material element of the objective side of the offense of ‘perjury’ from the perspective of the witness”. Revista de Stiinte Politice 71: 111–120.
Chin, Gabriel J., Scott C. Wells. 1997. “The blue wall of silence as evidence of bias and motive to lie: A new approach to police perjury”. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 59: 233–299.
Crank, Stephanie D., Drew A. Curtis. 2023. “And nothing but the truth: An exploration of perjury”. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 38 (1): 83–92.
Doyle, Charles. 2018. False statements and perjury: An overview of Federal Criminal Law. Accessed July 30, 2022. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/98-808.pdf.
Dubinin, Lev. G. 2012. “Motives for deliberately false testimony of witnesses and victims”. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ 16: 28–32. (In Russian)
Dunkle, Samuel. 2021. “‘The air was blue with perjury’: Police lies and the case for abolition”. New York University Law Review 96 (2): 2048–2093.
Ekman, Paul. 1985. “Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage”. New York, W. W. Norton & Company.
Garipov, Timur I. 2015. “On criminal liability of witnesses and victims for knowingly false testimony”. Zakon i pravo 4: 92–93. (In Russian)
Gel’dibaev, Movlad Kh. 2020. “Criminal legal characteristics of crimes against justice”. Ugolovnaia politika i pravoprimenitel’naia praktika: materialy VII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, 158–163. St. Petersburg, Asterion Publ. (In Russian)
Gorunescu, Mirela. 2019. “Issues of controversial practice referring to the crime of false testimony”. Lex ET Scientia International Journal 26: 116–123.
Heywood, Rob. 2014. “Hillsborough: Legal culpability in the aftermath of the findings of the Independent Panel”. Northern Ireland Legal Qqarterly 65 (1): 101–119.
Iancu, Elena-Ana. 2020. “Theoretical and practical aspects regarding the investigation of the criminal offence of false testimony”. Athens Journal of Law 6 (4): 323–338.
Kosiakova, Natal’ia S. 2001. “Perjury”. Gosudarstvo i pravo 4: 67–68. (In Russian)
Kudriavtsev, Dmitrii S. 2019. “Overcoming resistance to the detection and investigation of crimes in the Republic of Belarus” . PhD Thesis in Law, Moskovskii universitet Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossiiskoi Federatsii imeni V. Ia. Kikotia. (In Russian)
Kuleva, Liudmila O. 2019. “Taking into account the category of crimes when constructing elements of crimes and sanctions for their commission in the Criminal Code of The Russian Federation”. Vestnik Iaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki 3: 72–75. (In Russian)
Leont’ev, Dmitrii A. 2016. “The concept of motive in A. N. Leontiev and the problem of the quality of motivation”. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiia 2: 3–18. (In Russian)
Likholetov, Aleksandr A., Anna A. Pobednova. 2021. “Problems of applying the rule on criminal liability for knowingly false testimony, expert or specialist conclusions, or incorrect translation”. Vestnik Volgogradskoi akademii MVD Rossii 3 (58): 79–85. (In Russian)
Misnik, Irina V., Aleksei V. Daneev. 2019. “False testimony of a witness: Motives and tactics of incrimination”. Kriminalistika: vchera, segodnia, zavtra 3 (11): 66–70. (In Russian)
Morkhat, Petr M. 2019. Artificial intelligence: Reference judicial practice. Moscow, Iuniti-Dana Publ. (In Russian)
Muzychenko, Pavel B., Aleksandr D. Tregub. 2020. “Problems arising in the area of giving deliberately false testimony, the conclusion of an expert, specialist or incorrect translation”. Sovremennye problem ugolovnogo prava i protsessa: sbornik nauchnykh trudov 60-i studencheskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, 121–123. Khabarovsk, Tikhookeanskii gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)
Neuschatz, Jeffrey S., Danielle K. DeLoach, Megan A. Hillgartne, Melanie B. Fessinger, Stacy A. Wetmore, Amy B. Douglass, Brian H. Bornstein, Alexis M. Le Grand. 2021. “The truth about snitches: An archival analysis of informant testimony”. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 28 (4): 508–530.
Pikin, Ivan V., Mikhail I. Kliuchnikov, Ekaterina S. Barekhova. 2020. “Deliberately false denunciation and deliberately false testimony, opinion of an expert, specialist or incorrect translation: Current problems and ways to solve them”. Pravo i praktika 4: 145–149. (In Russian)
Riabchikov, Sergei. A. 2021. “Perjury: Controversial issues of prosecution and release from criminal liability”. Vestnik Ufimskogo iuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii 2 (92): 84–88. (In Russian)
Saint Sernin, Jean, Baptiste Javary. 2017. “L’exigence de sincerite du temoignage devant la commission d’enquete parlementaire: l’affaire Aubier”. Constitutions: revue de droit constitutionnel applique. Accessed July 29, 2022. https://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/UNIV-PARIS10/hal-03226873v1.
Schmidt, Sibylle. 2017. “Perpetrators’ knowledge: What and how can we learn from perpetrator testimony?” Journal of Perpetrator Research 1 (1): 85–104.
Skoczeń, Izabela. 2022. “Modelling perjury: Between trust and blame”. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Semiotique juridique 35 (2): 771–805.
Tarasova, Iuliia V. 2006. “Special subject of the crime and its significance in criminal law” . PhD Thesis in Law, Vserossiiskii nauchno-issledovatel’skii institut MVD Rossii. (In Russian)
Tikhonova, Svetlana S. 2008. Legal technology in criminal law: Course of lectures. Nizhny Novgorod, Dekom Publ. (In Russian)
Tonry, Michael. 2017. “Making American sentencing just, humane, and effective”. Crime and Justice 46 (1): 441–504.
Tsepelev, Konstantin V. 2018. “Knowingly false report and perjury, professional conclusion or incorrect translation: Criminal parameters and problems of qualification” . PhD Thesis in Law, Universitet prokuratury Rossiiskoi Federatsii. (In Russian)
Zahoor, Rashida, Muhammad F. Anwar, Muhammad A. Safdar, Jibran Jamshed. 2020. “A comparative study of perjury in legal system of Pakistan and Islamic law”. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies 6 (4): 1571–1579.
Zatona, Roman E. 2018. “On the responsibility of an expert and specialist as an intersectoral problem in Russian legislation”. Ugolovnoe pravo v evoliutsioniruiushchem obshchestve: problemy i perspektivy: sbornik nauchnykh statei, 227–231. Kursk, Iugo-Zapadnyi gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
2024-03-28
How to Cite
Mosechkin, I. N., & Krukovskiy, V. E. (2024). Perjury: problems of criminal law regulation of subjective signs, complicity and punishment established for a crime. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 15(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.105
Issue
Section
Public and Private Law: Applied Research
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
