Constitutional protection to participants of budgetary relations in the Russian Federation

Authors

  • Наталья Александровна Шевелева St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.203

Abstract

Currently, municipal entities are actively using the constitutional legal way to protect their budget rights. The applicants are most often local administrations while representing urban districts and municipal districts, as well as urban and rural settlements. The subject of the appeal to the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the previous three years was mainly the issues of the attribution of the expenditure obligation to public education, as well as the grounds and possibilities for the adoption by municipal entities of additional expenditure obligations, which were difficult for judicial consideration. An analysis of the “budgetary” decisions of the Constitutional Court of Russian Federation, the applicants for which the local self-government bodies acted, makes it possible to see that the problem of “careful and correct distribution of public powers between certain entities that are part of the general system of state and municipal power” remains unresolved, creating conflict situations. So, it requires the intervention of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.

Keywords:

budget disputes, municipalities, expenditure obligations of municipalities, transfer of state powers, additional expenditure obligations

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Гриценко, Елена В. 2014. «Городские агломерации: в поисках оптимальной модели территориальной организации (сравнительно-правовой анализ)». Конституционное и муниципальное право 10: 28–36.

Савиных, Владислав А. 2017. «В поисках содержания принципа экономической обоснованности кадастровой стоимости». Налоговед 10: 40–50.

Шевелева, Наталья А. «Самостоятельность субъектов РФ в формировании расходных обязательств: возможности и пределы (в контексте правовых позиций, сформулированных КС РФ в Постановлении от 5 апреля 2013 г. № 7-П)». Журнал конституционного правосудия 6: 25–31.

Lukovskaya, D., Sheveleva, N., Volkova, S., Vasilyev, I., Ilyin, A. 2016. “The Role of Mikhail Speransky in the Financial System Reform”. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 7 (6): 1436–1443.

Will, Rosemarie, Gritsenko, Elena. 2013. Rechtsschutzmöglichkeiten kommunaler Subjekte in Russland und Deutschland. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.

References

Gritsenko, Elena V. 2014. “Gorodskie aglomeratsii: v poiskakh optimal’noi modeli territorial’noi organizatsii(sravnitel’no-pravovoi analiz)” [“Urban Agglomerations: in Search of the Optimal Model of Territorial Organization (Comparative Legal Analysis)”]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo [Constitutional and Municipal Law] 10: 28–36.(In Russian)

Lukovskaya, D., Sheveleva, N., Volkova, S., Vasilyev, I., Ilyin, A. 2016. “The Role of Mikhail Speransky in the Financial System Reform.” Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 7 (6): 1436–1443.

Savinykh, Vladislav A. 2017. “V poiskakh soderzhaniia printsipa ekonomicheskoi obosnovannosti kadastrovoi stoimosti” [“Searching for the Content of the Principle of Economic Justification of Cadastral Value”]. Nalogoved [Specialist in Taxes] 10: 40–50.(In Russian)

Sheveleva, Natalia A. “Samostoiatel’nost’ sub”ektov RF v formirovanii raskhodnykh obiazatel’stv: vozmozhnosti i predely (v kontekste pravovykh pozitsii, sformulirovannykh KS RF v Postanovlenii ot 5 aprelia 2013 g. № 7-P)” [“The Independence of the Subjects of the Russian Federation in the Formation of Expenditure Obligations: Opportunities and Limits (in the Context of Legal Positions Formulated by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in Decree No. 7-P of April 5, 2013)”]. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiia [Journal of Constitutional Justice] 6: 25–31.(In Russian)

Will, Rosemarie, Gritsenko, Elena. 2013. Rechtsschutzmöglichkeiten kommunaler Subjekte in Russland und Deutschland. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.

Published

2018-06-15

How to Cite

Шевелева, Н. А. (2018). Constitutional protection to participants of budgetary relations in the Russian Federation. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 9(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.203

Issue

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)