The official policy of memory in modern Russia: Legal dimension

Authors

  • Александра Андреевна Дорская Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, 48, Moika, St. Petersburg, 191186, Russian Federation
  • Андрей Юрьевич Дорский St. Petersburg State University, 7/9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.201

Abstract

The article analyzes the legal and regulatory framework, as well as the decisions of executive authorities that determine the official policy of memory in the Russian Federation. It is established that the possibility to talk about the policy of memory has appeared since the Ancient Rus’ period of time, when the main forms of preserving information about historical events and personalities were canonization; carried out by the Russian Orthodox Church, and, public events such as a creation of orders, establishment of monuments, etc. On the basis of the analysis, it was concluded that self-identification of modern Russian people is mainly related to the Soviet period of the Russian history. The official policy of memory is defined to have constructivist nature rather than protective one. The example of the main “social traumas” of the Russian society of the twentieth century such as the October Revolution of 1917 and the Great Patriotic War reveals the official attitude to fundamental governmental and legal guidelines, inter alia, progressive development of the state and society, civil initiative, prevention of civil wars, fight against fascism and refusal to review the results of the Second World War. An analysis of the decisions of the Federal Antimonopoly Service between 2015 to 2017 on the use of historical images in advertising, which is found offensive, is conducted. The article concludes that the official policy of memory in the Russian Federation has international and domestic components. Examples are given from the legislation of France, Belgium, and Poland, related to the regulation of similar processes.

Keywords:

a policy of memory, re-living of history, social trauma, the October Revolution of 1917, the Second World War, the Great Patriotic War, legal and regulatory framework, decisions of executive authorities, communication

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Головашина, Оксана В. 2016. «(Бес)порядок времени и политика памяти». Вестник Тверского государственного университета. Сер. «Философия» 4: 199–206.

Ежевика. Б. д. «Уголовное преследование отрицания Холокоста». Дата обращения 31 января, 2018. http://www.ejwiki.org/wiki/Уголовное_преследование_отрицания_Холокоста.

Лихоманов, Петр. 2017. «ООН приняла российскую резолюцию по борьбе с нацизмом». Российская газета. 16 ноября. Дата обращения 17 ноября, 2017. https://rg.ru/2017/11/16/oon-prinialarossijskuiu-rezoliuciiu-po-borbe-s-nacizmom.html

Матусевич, Ольга А. 2015. «Конфликт интерпретаций прошлого в современном обществе». Труды БГТУ. История, философия, филология 5 (178): 131–135.

Настоящее время. Б. д. «В Сенате Польши поддержали законопроект, криминализирующий упоминания об участии поляков в Холокосте». Дата обращения 31 января, 2018. https://www.currenttime.tv/a/29009848.html.

Оптимист. 2015. «Какие страны имеют территориальные претензии к России». Дата обращения 17 ноября, 2017. http://oppps.ru/kakie-strany-imeyut-territorialnye-pretenzii-k-rossii.html.

РИА Новости. Б. д. а. «День Октябрьской революции 1917 г.». Дата обращения 7 ноября, 2017. https://ria.ru/spravka/20171107/1507990701.html.

РИА Новости. Б. д. b. «Дело бывшего советского партизана Василия Кононова». Дата обращения 31 января, 2018. https://ria.ru/spravka/20110401/360024444.html.

Федеральная антимонопольная служба. Б. д. «О ФАС России». Дата обращения 31 января, 2018. https://fas.gov.ru/pages/about/overview/obshhee.html.

Хальбвакс, Морис. 2007. Социальные рамки памяти. Перевод Сергей Н. Зенкин. М.: Новое издательство.

Abăseacă, Raluca. 2017. “Collective Memory and Social Movements in Times of Crisis: the Case of Romania”. Nationalities Papers December (9): 1–14.

Behr, Valentin. 2017. “Historical Policy-Making in Post-1989 Poland: a Sociological Approach to the Narratives of Communism”. European Politics and Society 18 (1): 81–95.

Cerdán, Josetxo, and Labayen, Miguel Fernández. 2017. “Memory and Mass Graves: Political Strategies of Independent Documentaries”. Atalante 23: 187–198.

Çiftçi, Erdal. 2018. “Migration, Memory and Mythification: Relocation of Suleymani Tribes on the Northern Ottoman — Iranian Frontier”. Middle Eastern Studies 54 (2): 270–288.

Figueiredo, Ana Mateus, Oldenhove, Géraldine, and Licata, Laurent. 2018. “Collective Memories of Colonialism and Acculturation Dynamics among Congolese Immigrants Living in Belgium”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 62: 80–92.

Galarza, León, Catalina, Natalia. 2018. “Solo la sangre salva: represión cruenta y memoria política en Guayaquil bajo el mandato de Camilo Ponce (1959)”. Anuario Colombiano de Historia Social y de la Cultura 45 (1): 339–366.

Instytut pamięci narodowej. N. d. “O IPN”. Accessed January 31, 2018. http://ipn.gov.pl/pl/o-ipn/24154,OIPN.html.

Milošević, Ana. 2018. “Historicizing the Present: Brussels Attacks and Heritagization of Spontaneous Memorials”. International Journal of Heritage Studies 24 (1): 53–65.

References

Abăseacă, Raluca. 2017. “Collective Memory and Social Movements in Times of Crisis: the Case of Romania”. Nationalities Papers December (9): 1–14.

Behr, Valentin. 2017. “Historical Policy-Making in Post-1989 Poland: a Sociological Approach to the Narratives of Communism”. European Politics and Society 18 (1): 81–95.

Cerdán, Josetxo, and Labayen, Miguel Fernández. 2017. “Memory and Mass Graves: Political Strategies of Independent Documentaries”. Atalante 23: 187–198.

Çiftçi, Erdal. 2018. “Migration, Memory and Mythification: Relocation of Suleymani Tribes on the Northern Ottoman-Iranian Frontier”. Middle Eastern Studies 54 (2): 270–288

Ezhevika. N. d. “Ugolovnoe presledovanie otritsaniia Holokosta” [“Criminal prosecution of the denial of the Holocaust”]. Accessed January 31, 2018. http://www.ejwiki.org/wiki/Ugolovnoe_presledovanie_otritsaniia_Kholokosta.(In Russian)

Federal Antimonopoly Service. N. d. “O FAS Rossii” [“On the FAS Russia”]. Accessed January 31, 2018. https://fas.gov.ru/pages/about/overview/obshhee.html. (In Russian)

Figueiredo, Ana Mateus, Oldenhove, Géraldine, and Licata, Laurent. 2018. “Collective Memories of Colonialism and Acculturation Dynamics among Congolese Immigrants Living in Belgium”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 62: 80–92.

Galarza, León, Catalina, Natalia. 2018. “Solo la sangre salva: represión cruenta y memoria política en Guayaquil bajo el mandato de Camilo Ponce (1959)” [“Solo la sangre salva: Bloody Repression and Political Memory in Guayaquil during the Administration of Camilo Ponce (1959)”]. Anuario Colombiano de Historia Social y de la Cultura 45, 1: 339–366.

Golovashina, Oksana V. 2016. “(Bes)poriadok vremeni i politika pamiati” [“(Dis) order of Time and Politics of Memory”]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia Filosofiia [Bulletin of Tver State University. Series “Philosophy”] 4: 199–206.(In Russian)

Halbwachs, Maurice. 2007. Sotsial’nye ramki pamiati [Social Framework of Memory]. Translation by Sergei N. Zenkin. Мoscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo Publishers.(In Russian)

Instytut pamięci narodowej. N. d. “O IPN.” Accessed January 31, 2018. http://ipn.gov.pl/pl/o-ipn/24154,OIPN.html.

Lihomanov, Petr. 2017. “OON priniala rossiiskuiu rezoliutsiiu po bor’be s natsizmom” [“The UN Adopted a Russian Resolution on Combating Nazism”]. Rossiiskaia Gazeta [Russian Newspaper]. 16 November. Accessed November 17, 2017. https://rg.ru/2017/11/16/oon-priniala-rossijskuiu-rezoliuciiu-poborbe-s-nacizmom.html.(In Russian)

Matusevich, Olga A. 2015. “Konflikt interpretatsii proshlogo v sovremennom obshchestve” [“The Conflict of Interpretations of the Past in Contemporary Society”]. Trudy BGTU. Istoriia, filosofiia, filologiia [Proceedings of Belarusian State Technological University. History, Philosophy, Philology] 5 (178): 131–135.(In Russian)

Milošević, Ana. 2018. “Historicizing the present: Brussels attacks and heritagization of spontaneous memorials.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 24, Issue 1: 53–65.

Nastoiashchee vremia [Present time]. N. d. “V Senate Pol’shi podderzhali zakonoproekt, kriminaliziruiushchii upominaniia ob uchastii poliakov v Kholokoste” [“The Senate of Poland Supported the Bill Criminalizing the Mention of the Participation of Poles in the Holocaust”]. Accessed January 31, 2018. https://www.currenttime.tv/a/29009848.html.(In Russian)

Optimist. 2015. “Kakie strany imeiut territorial’nye pretenzii k Rossii” [“Which Countries Have Territorial Claims to Russia”]. Accessed November 17, 2017. http://oppps.ru/kakie-strany-imeyut-territorialnyepretenzii-k-rossii.html.(In Russian)

RIA Novosti [RIA News]. N. d. а. “Den’ Oktiabr’skoi revoliutsii 1917 g.” [“The Day of the October Revolution of 1917”]. Accessed November 7, 2017. https://ria.ru/spravka/20171107/1507990701.html. (In Russian)

RIA Novosti [RIA News]. N. d. b. “Delo byvshego sovetskogo partizana Vasiliia Kononova” [“The Case of the Former Soviet Partisan Vasily Kononov”]. Accessed January 31, 2018. https://ria.ru/spravka/20110401/360024444.html.(In Russian)

Published

2018-06-15

How to Cite

Дорская, А. А., & Дорский, А. Ю. (2018). The official policy of memory in modern Russia: Legal dimension. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 9(2), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.201

Issue

Section

Theory and History of Law and State

Most read articles by the same author(s)