A New Quantitative Criminology Manifesto: Evidence Based Criminal Justice Policymaking

Authors

  • Кирилл Дмитриевич Титаев European University at Saint-Petersburg, 6/1-A, ul. Gagarinskaya, St. Petersburg, 191187, Russian Federation
  • Дмитрий Анатольевич Скугаревский European University at Saint-Petersburg, 6/1-A, ul. Gagarinskaya, St. Petersburg, 191187, Russian Federation
  • Алексей Викторович Кнорре European University at Saint-Petersburg, 6/1-A, ul. Gagarinskaya, St. Petersburg, 191187, Russian Federation
  • Владимир Евгеньевич Кудрявцев European University at Saint-Petersburg, 6/1-A, ul. Gagarinskaya, St. Petersburg, 191187, Russian Federation
  • Мария Сергеевна Шклярук European University at Saint-Petersburg, 6/1-A, ul. Gagarinskaya, St. Petersburg, 191187, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.107

Abstract

The Institute for the Rule of Law together with Centre for Strategic Research has written “A New Quantitative Criminology Manifesto: Evidence Based Criminal Justice Policymaking”. This paper stresses the importance of new technologies and approaches to data analysis in criminology research geared toward evidence-based policymaking. This manifesto demonstrates how quantitative methods can be used to get new insights into the nature of crime and the formulation of Russian criminal justice policy.

Keywords:

criminology, statistics, quantitative methods, credibility revolution

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Angrist, J., and J.-S. Pischke. 2010. “The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2): 3–30.

Becker, G. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach”. Journal of Political Economy 76 (2): 169–217.

Dharmapala, D. 2016. The ‘Credibility Revolution’ in Empirical Law and Economics. Coase Lecture in Law and Economics. University of Chicago Law School. Дата обращения 17 ноября, 2016. http://www.law.uchicago.edu/video/dhammika-dharmapala-credibility-revolution-in-empirical-law-and-economics.

Kaye, J. M. 1967. “Early history of murder and manslaughter”. Law Quarterly Review 83: 365–395, 569–601.

Mitchell B. 1998. “Public perceptions of homicide and criminal justice”. British Journal of Criminology: 38 (3): 453–472.

Данные Управления по наркотикам и преступности ООН по Российской Федерации. 2014. Дата обращения 1 июля, 2017. https://data.unodc.org.

Кнорре, Алексей, Дмитрий Скугаревский. 2015. Как МВД и ФСКН борются с наркотиками: сравнительный анализ результативности двух ведомств: аналитическая записка. Дата обращения 17 ноября, 2016. http://enforce.spb.ru/images/analit_zapiski/FSKN_MVD_memo_2015_web.pdf.

Кудрявцев, Владимир Н. 2002. Избранные труды по социальным наукам: Криминология, социология, конфликтология. М.: Наука.

Рарог, Алексей И. 2006. Настольная книга судьи по квалификации преступлений: практическое пособие. М.: Издательство «Проспект».

References

Angrist, J., and J.-S. Pischke. 2010. “The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2): 3–30.

Becker, G. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach”. Journal of Political Economy 76 (2): 169–217.

Dannye Upravleniia po narkotikam i prestupnosti OON po Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Data of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime on the Russian Federation]. 2014. Accessed July 1, 2017. https://data.unodc.org. (In Russian)

Dharmapala, D. 2016. The ‘Credibility Revolution’ in Empirical Law and Economics. Coase Lecture in Law and Economics. University of Chicago Law School. Accessed November 17, 2016. http://www.law.uchicago.edu/video/dhammika-dharmapala-credibility-revolution-in-empirical-law-and-economics.

Kaye, J. M. 1967. “Early history of murder and manslaughter”. Law Quarterly Review 83: 365–395, 569–601.

Knorre, Alexei, Dmitry Skugarevsky. 2015. Kak MVD i FSKN boriutsia s narkotikami: sravnitel’nyi analiz rezul’tativnosti dvukh vedomstv: analiticheskaia zapiska [How the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Federal Drug Control Service are fighting drugs: a comparative analysis of the performance of the two agencies: an analytical note]. Accessed November 17, 2016. http://enforce.spb.ru/images/analit_zapiski/FSKN_MVD_memo_2015_web.pdf.(In Russian)

Kudryavtsev, Vladimir N. 2002. Izbrannye trudy po sotsial’nym naukam: Kriminologiia, sotsiologiia, konfliktologiia [Selected works on social sciences: Criminology, sociology, conflictology]. Moscow: Science. (In Russian)

Mitchell B. 1998. “Public perceptions of homicide and criminal justice.” British Journal of Criminology: 38 (3): 453–472.

Rarog, Alexei I. 2006. Nastol’naia kniga sud’i po kvalifikatsii prestuplenii: prakticheskoe posobie [A bench book of the judge on the qualification of crimes: a practical guide]. Moscow: Prospekt Publishing House.(In Russian)

Published

2018-04-02

How to Cite

Титаев, К. Д., Скугаревский, Д. А., Кнорре, А. В., Кудрявцев, В. Е., & Шклярук, М. С. (2018). A New Quantitative Criminology Manifesto: Evidence Based Criminal Justice Policymaking. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 9(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.107

Issue

Section

Studies of Law from the Standpoint of Social and Humanities (non-Legal) Sciences