About the right of the territorial subject of the federation to objection

Authors

  • Александр Николаевич Шмелев Moscow city notarial chamber, 6/3, Bobrov per., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.104

Abstract

In this article is established the legal nature of the extraordinary nullification powers of a territorial subject of a federation with respect to a decision of a federal government as expressed in a regulatory legal act. By means of systems analysis of the current legislation of the Russian Federation, tendencies of development of federalism in world practice, domestic legal and political traditions, the following theses are demonstrated by the author: 1) the right of the territorial subject of a federation to objection corresponds to the principles of the democratic and constitutional state, 2) the right to objection expressed in the form of a nullification of a regulatory legal act cannot be recognized unlawful in the case where the territorial subject of the federation which announced the objection used for permission of the arisen political and legal crisis the legal mechanisms which are available in the existing federal legislation or not contradicting it. On the basis of the stated theses the author comes to the conclusion that the political and legal integrity of a state is best assured when a federal territorial subject adopts into law a procedure by which the nullification of a normative legal act is effected on its territory and judicial control is levied on such procedures.

Keywords:

nullification, federation, territorial subject of the federation, right, politics, legal act, judicial review, compliance assessment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Бережная, Татьяна В. 2006. “Формы разграничения предметов ведения и полномочий между Российской Федерацией и субъектами Российской Федерации: конституционно-правовое исследование”. Диc.… д-ра юрид. наук. Омск: Омский государственный университет им. Ф. М. Достоевского.

Кененова, Ирина П. 2007. “Вертикаль исполнительной власти и некоторые конституционно-правовые проблемы современного цикла развития власти в России”. Государственная власть и местное самоуправление 3: 3–15.

Коврякова, Елена В. 2017. “Основы государственной национальной стратегии: конституционно-правовой аспект”. Lex russica 1: 50–61.

Лебедев, Антон О. 2013. “Идеи федерализма в российской науке конституционного права во второй половине XIX — начале XX вв.” Диc. … канд. юрид. наук. М.: Национальный исследовательский университет “Высшая школа экономики”.

Москаленко, Михаил Н. 2015. “Сущность и специфика конституционных конфликтов на современном этапе развития Российского государства”. Современный юрист 3: 54–70.

Официальный сайт Конституционного Суда Российской Федерации. “Выступление профессора Т. Г. Морщаковой на Вторых Сенатских чтениях”. Дата обращения 20 ноября, 2017. http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/Info/Reading/Pages/Performance.aspx.

Торшенко, Александр А. 1998. “О конституционности договоров о разграничении предметов ведения и полномочий между органами государственной власти РФ и органами государственной власти субъектов РФ”. Чиновникъ: информационно-аналитический вестник Уральской академии государственной службы 3 (3). Дата обращения 20 ноября, 2017. http://chinovnik.uapa.ru/ru/issue/1998/03/06.

Филиппова, Наталья А. 2012. “Новая модель разграничения и децентрализации полномочий в системе российского федерализма: проблемы обеспечения интересов субъектов Российской Федерации”. Научный ежегодник Института философии и права Уральского отделения Российской академии наук 12: 420–438.

Хабриева, Талия Я. 2016. Конституционная реформа в современном мире: монография. М.: Наука РАН.

Черепанов, Виктор А. 2004. “Конституционно-правовые основы разделения государственной власти между Российской Федерацией и ее субъектами”. Диc. … д-ра юрид. наук. М.: Академия управления МВД России.

References

“Vystuplenie professora T. G. Morshchakovoi na Vtorykh Senatskikh chteniiakh” [“Speech of Professor T. G. Morshchakova at the Second Senate Readings”]. Ofitsial’nyi sait Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii [The official website of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Accessed November 20, 2017. http://www.ksrf.ru/en/Info/Reading/Pages/Performance.aspx.(In Russian)

Berezhnaya, Tatiana V. 2006. “Formy razgranicheniia predmetov vedeniia i polnomochii mezhdu Rossiiskoi Federatsiei i sub”ektami Rossiiskoi Federatsii: konstitutsionno-pravovoe issledovanie” [“Forms of delimitation of the subjects of jurisdiction and authority between the Russian Federation and the subjects of the Russian Federation: constitutional and legal research”]. Dr. Sc. diss. Omsk: Omsk State University named after F. M. Dostoevsky.(In Russian)

Cherepanov, Victor A. 2004. “Konstitutsionno-pravovye osnovy razdeleniia gosudarstvennoi vlasti mezhdu Rossiiskoi Federatsiei i ee sub”ektami” [“Constitutional and legal basis for the separation of state power between the Russian Federation and its subjects”]. Dr. Sc. diss. Moscow: Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.(In Russian)

Filippova, Natalia A. 2012. “Novaia model’ razgranicheniia i detsentralizatsii polnomochii v sisteme rossiiskogo federalizma: problemy obespecheniia interesov sub”ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii” [“A new model of delineation and decentralization of powers in the system of Russian federalism: problems of ensuring the interests of the subjects of the Russian Federation”]. Nauchnyi ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural’skogo otdeleniia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk [Scientific Yearbook of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences] 12.(In Russian)

Kenenova, Irina P. 2007. “Vertikal’ ispolnitel’noi vlasti i nekotorye konstitutsionno-pravovye problemy sovremennogo tsikla razvitiia vlasti v Rossii” [“Vertical of executive power and some constitutional and legal problems of the current cycle of power development in Russia”]. Gosudarstvennaia vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie [State power and local self-government] 3: 3–15.(In Russian)

Khabrieva, Talia Ya. 2016. Konstitutsionnaia reforma v sovremennom mire [Constitutional reform in the modern world]: a monograph. Moscow: Nauka RAN.(In Russian)

Kovryakova, Elena V. 2017. “Osnovy gosudarstvennoi natsional’noi strategii: konstitutsionno-pravovoi aspekt”[“Fundamentals of the state national strategy: the constitutional and legal aspect”]. Lex russica 1: 50–61.(In Russian)

Lebedev, Anton O. 2013. “Idei federalizma v rossiiskoi nauke konstitutsionnogo prava vo vtoroi polovine XIX — nachale XX vv.” [“Ideas of federalism in the Russian science of constitutional law in the second half of the XIX — beginning of the XX centuries”]. PhD diss. Moscow: National Research University “Higher School of Economics”.(In Russian)

Moskalenko, Mikhail N. 2015. “Sushchnost’ i spetsifika konstitutsionnykh konfliktov na sovremennom etape razvitiia Rossiiskogo gosudarstva” [“The essence and specificity of constitutional conflicts at the present stage of development of the Russian state”]. Sovremennyi iurist [Modern lawyer] 3: 54–70.(In Russian)

Torshenko, Alexander A. 1998. “O konstitutsionnosti dogovorov o razgranichenii predmetov vedeniia i polnomochii mezhdu organami gosudarstvennoi vlasti RF i organami gosudarstvennoi vlasti sub”ektov RF” [“On the constitutionality of treaties on the delimitation of the subjects of jurisdiction and authority between the government bodies of the Russian Federation and state authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation”]. Chinovnik”: informatsionno-analiticheskii vestnik Ural’skoi akademii gosudarstvennoi sluzhby [Official: Information and Analytical Bulletin of the Ural Academy of Civil Service] 3 (3). Accessed November 20, 2017. http://chinovnik.uapa.ru/ru/issue/1998/03/06. (In Russian)

Published

2018-04-02

How to Cite

Шмелев, А. Н. (2018). About the right of the territorial subject of the federation to objection. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 9(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.104

Issue

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research