Experiencing history as a factor of self-identification of states and peoples of the post-Soviet space: Legal dimension

Aleksandra A. Dorskaia; Andrei Yu. Dorskii

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2022.214

Authors

Aleksandra A. Dorskaia The North-Western Branch of the Russian State University of Justice, 5, Alexandrovskii park, St Petersburg, 197046, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8723-8673
Andrei Yu. Dorskii St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0991-2941

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.214

Abstract

For Armenia, Belarus, Estonia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, the Russian Federation, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan, the basic forms of self-identification of states are described: the declaration of an official position on the assessment of historical events; the adoption of memorial laws, by which criminal liability can be established for expressing a position on facts of the past that does not correspond to the state’s position; and a policy for awards based on positive examples in the history of the country. Based on normative legal acts, officially adopted concepts and strategies, as well as a review of literature, this article identifies such models of official remembrance policy that have developed in the post-Soviet space as the defense of historical truth and historical memory, the requirement to recognize crimes committed in the past, the denial of the positive aspects of a particular stage of history, the search for state and social identity in the distant past, and its mythologization. The causes for mainstreaming history at the present stage and reflection of this process in the complex relationship of history and memory are considered. The stages of updating historical knowledge for states and peoples of the post-Soviet space are highlighted. Features of the award policy, various concepts underlying the award systems in the former republics of the Soviet Union, as well as general historical assessments of specific events and personalities are shown, even in the face of divergence of the official remembrance policy. The authors make conclusions about the adequate strategy leading to long-term results, aimed at joint experiencing the traumatic events of the past by the states and peoples, drawing lessons from them and determining ways to further development without creating an image of the enemy.

Keywords:

official remembrance policy, award policy, self-identification of states, selfidentification of peoples, statutes of orders, experiencing history

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References

Bentham, Jeremy, Etienne Dumont. 1840. Oeuvres de Jérémie Bentham 3ème éd. Bruxelles, Société belge de librairie.

Cherkashina, Tat’iana N. 2018. “Armenian Genocide denial by Turkey: On the history of the problem”. Omskie nauchnye chteniia 2018. Materialy Vtoroi Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Ed. by Tat’iana F. Iashchuk, 285–286. Omsk, Omskii gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)

Diatlenko, Pavel I. 2014. “Features of memory policy of Stalin’s repressions and rehabilitation of their victims in Kyrgyzstan at present: Public and academic initiatives, the lack of the official policy”. Vestnik Kyrgyzsko-Rossiiskogo Slavianskogo universiteta 14 (3): 32–35. (In Russian)

Galiev, Anuar A. 2016. “Reflection of Soviet history in the memory policy of modern Kazakhstan”. Mir Bol’shogo Altaia 2 (1–3): 430–440. (In Russian)

Galitskaia, Kristina A. 2021. “The politics of national memory as a technology of legitimation of the power”. Diskurs-Pi 1 (42 (18)): 48–61. (In Russian)

Holmes, Leslie. 2016. “Comparative conclusions: Legitimacy and legitimation in Eurasian post-communist states”. Politics and Legitimacy in Post-Soviet Eurasia. Ed. by Martin Brusis, Joachim Ahrens, Martin S. Wessel, 223–245. London, Palgrave Macmillan.

Jhering, Rudolf von. 1881. Law as a means to an end (Der Zweck im Recht). Vol. 1. St Petersburg, N. V. Murav’ev Publ. (In Russian)

Kapustkin, Aleksandr S. 2018. “Awards legal policy as an element of anticorruption policy”. Vestnik Vladimirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Aleksandra Grigor’evicha i Nikolaia Grigor’evicha Stoletovykh. Ser. Iuridicheskie nauki 3 (17): 31–35. (In Russian)

Kas’ianov, Georgii V. 2016. “Historical policy and ‘memorial’ laws in Ukraine: The beginning of the 21st century”. Istoricheskaia ekspertiza 2: 28–55. (In Russian)

Khaminov, Dmitrii V. 2005. “Soviet award system in the context of the ideological policy of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union”. Voprosy istorii, mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii i dokumentovedeniia. Sbornik trudov studentov i aspirantov istoricheskogo fakul’teta. Ed. by Vasilii P. Zinov’ev, 16–20. Tomsk, Tomskii gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)

Kharatian, Granush S. 2017. “Politics of memory conquer or ‘ordered to forget’: Making the memory into a social and family ‘secret’ and a weapon against memory holders (the case of the Armenian genocide)”. Ustnaia istoriia v sovremennoi issledovatel’skoi praktike na postsovetskom prostranstve. Ed. by Tat’iana K. Shcheglova, 126–154. Barnaul, Altaiskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet Publ. (In Russian)

Kokurina, Ol’ga Iu. 2011. “History of Russian state policy of awarding (pre-revolutionary period)”. Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie 4 (75): 143–153. (In Russian)

Kolosovskaia, Tat’iana A., Dmitrii S. Tkachenko. 2020. “The imperial politics of memory in the Caucasus: Mechanisms for constructing mass historical consciousness (19th — early 20th centuries)”. Novyi istoricheskii vestnik 2 (64): 131–154. https://doi.org/10.24411/2072-9286-2020-00014. (In Russian)

Kosovan, Elena A. 2018. “Politics of memory in modern Russia and Russian memorial canon as a basis of national identity”. Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskoi otkrytoi akademii 27: 1–14. (In Russian)

Linchenko, Andrei A. 2018. “The past, which does not leave: Memory of the War and Holocaust in Lithuania”. Dialog so vremenem 63: 375–382. (In Russian)

Medushevskii, Nikolai A. 2019. “Memory policy in the European Union as a tool for the implementation of the integration process”. Vlast’ 27 (3): 167–174. (In Russian)

Mushta, Aleksandr A., Tat’iana V. Rastimeshina. 2021. “Transformations of the national security concepts of Belarus and Russia and historical policy: Substantive aspects”. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’no-gumanitarnye issledovaniia 3 (31): 87–99. https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-1073-2021-3-87-99. (In Russian)

Nikol’chenko, Iuzef M. 2011. “Cossacks in the context of award policy of Ukraine”. Vіsnik Marіupol’s’kogo derzhavnogo unіversitetu. Ser. Fіlosofіia, kul’turologіia, sotsіologіia 1: 93–99. (In Ukrainian)

Petrov, Aleksandr G. 2007. “Rehabilitation of victims of political repression: Historical and legal analysis”. Dr. Sci. diss., Nizhegorodskaia akademiia MVD Rossii. (In Russian)

Poliakova, Natal’ia V. 2019. “On symbolic aspects of the modern Belarusian politics of memory: Nationalism vs. zapadnorusizm”. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiia. Sotsiologiia. Politologiia 52: 205–212. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863Х/52/19. (In Russian)

Rozanov, Oleg N. 2008. “Award system as a tool of China’s public policy”. Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka 4: 68–79. (In Russian)

Trofimov, Egor V. 2015. “Challenges of forming an award policy in the Russian Federation”. Aktual’nye voprosy razvitiia rossiiskoi gosudarstvennosti i publichnogo prava: materialy vserossiiskoi nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii 25 maia 2015 g. Ed. by Egor V. Trofimov, 142–147. St Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburgskii institut (filial) Vserossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta iustitsii (RPA Miniusta Rossii) Publ. (In Russian)

Zverev, Kirill A. 2020. “State historical policy in modern Latvia”. Problemy natsional’noi strategii 1 (58): 163–177. (In Russian)