Modification or termination of contracts due to international economic sanctions from the standpoint of Russian legislation and court practice

Anastasia I. Goriacheva

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2022.403

Authors

Anastasia I. Goriacheva Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (MGIMO-University), 76, pr. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0346-5068

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.403

Abstract

In this article the author covers the problem of possible modification or termination of contracts due to international economic sanctions, in particular the US and EU sanctions against Russia. The author analyses relevant legislative acts, approaches of governmental authorities and court practice on this matter. This extensive analysis includes overview of development of main legal doctrines and institutions, related to the subject matter of this article. Moreover, it covers definitions of the relevant terms. This article is mainly aimed at defining a list of criteria to rely on when determining the possibility to modify or terminate a contract due to international economic sanctions in each particular case. The author raises the hypothesis that possibility to modify or terminate a contract due to international economic sanctions is subject to a closed list of criteria. The subject matter of this article is important since sanctions are now one of the main instruments of political influence in interstate relations and have a significant impact on all types of contractual relationships. Today, a major and common challenge faced by market participants is the inability to enforce contracts the way they were originally entered into. Due to the fact that in Russia it is rare for contracts to be amended or terminated due to newly imposed sanctions, parties do not always find themselves in a position to enforce a contract in a timely manner or to perform at all. As a result, the stability of the business environment is disrupted and the level of trust is reduced. Thus, it is highly important to perform a thorough analysis of this matter and provide possible solutions for market participants.

Keywords:

international economic sanctions, sanctions, clausula rebus sic stantibus, substantial change of circumstances, contracts, hardship

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References

Aristophanes. 1983. “Akharnians”. Rus. ed. Komedii. In 2 vols, vol. 1: 5–72. Moscow, Isskustvo Publ. (In Russian)

Ashford, Emma. 2016. “Not-so-smart sanctions: The failure of western restrictions against Russia”. Foreign Affairs 95 (1): 114–123.

Baldwin, David A. 1985. Economic statecraft. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Bowett, Derek W. 1972. “Economic coercion and reprisals by states”. Virginia Journal of International Law 13 (1): 1–12.

Brosche, Hartmut. 1974. “The Arab oil embargo and United States pressure against Chile: Economic and political coercion and the Charter of the United Nations”. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 7 (1): 3–35.

Carter, Barry E. 1988. International economic sanctions: Improving the haphazard U. S. legal regime. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Doraev, Mergen G. 2016. Economic sanctions in the law of the United States, the European Union and Russia. Moscow, Infotropic Media Publ. (In Russian)

Elagab, Omer Yousif. 1988. The legality of non-forcible counter-measures in international law. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Entin, Mark, Ekaterina Entina. 2015. “Sanction wars or equal cooperation: Time to choose”. Vsia Evropa 3 (97). Accessed September 21, 2021. http://alleuropa.ru/?p=11502. (In Russian)

Evgen’eva, Anastasiia P., ed. 1999. Dictionary of Russian language. In 4 vols, vol. 4. 4th ed. Moscow, Russkii iazyk Publ., Poligrafresursy Publ. (In Russian)

Gernhuber, Joachim. 1983. “§ 242 BGB — Funktionen und Tatbestände”. Juristische Schulung (JuS): 764–769.

Gurvich, Evsey, Ilya Prilepskiy. 2015. “The impact of financial sanctions on the Russian economy”. Russian Journal of Economics 1 (4): 359–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2016.02.002

Hofer, Alexandra. 2017. “The developed/developing divide on unilateral coercive measures: Legitimate enforcement or illegitimate intervention?”. Chinese Journal of International Law 16 (2): 175–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmx018

Hörbelt, Christian. 2017. “A comparative study: Where and why does the EU impose sanctions”. Revista UNISCI 43: 53–71. Accessed September 21, 2021. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/767/76749542004.pdf

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Jeffrey J. Schott, Kimberly Ann Elliott, Barbara Oegg. 2009. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered. 3rd ed. Washington, Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Jeffrey J. Schott. 1985. Economic sanctions reconsidered: History and current policy. Washington, Institute for International Economics.

Ivanov, Anton A. 2016. “Legal problems of currency clause effect in contracts”. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiia Rossiiskoi Federatsii 5: 70–79. (In Russian)

Lauterpacht, Hersch. 2004. International law: Collected papers. In 5 vols, vol. 5: Disputes, war and neutrality: Parts IX–XIV. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Lenway, Stefanie Ann. 1988. “Between war and commerce: Economic sanctions as a tool of statecraft”. International Organization 42 (2): 397–426.

Lillich, Richard B. 1976. “Economic coercion and the ‘New International Economic Order’: A second look at some first impressions”. Virginia Journal of International Law 16 (2): 233–244.

Malloy, Michael P. 1990. Economic sanctions and U. S. trade. Boston, Toronto, London, Little, Brown & Co.

Marossi, Ali Z., Marisa R. Bassett, eds. 2015. Economic sanctions under international law: Unilateralism, multilateralism, legitimacy, and consequences. Hague, Berlin, Heidelberg, T. M. C. Asser Press, Springer.

McDougal, Myres S., Florentino P. Feliciano. 1958. “International coercion and world public order: The general principles of the law of war”. Yale Law Journal 67 (5): 771–845.

Meyer, Jeffrey A. 2009. “Second thoughts on secondary sanctions”. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 30 (3): 905–967.

Moret, Erica, Thomas Biersteker, Francesco Giumelli, Clara Portela, Marusa Veber, Dawid Bastiat-Jarosz, Cristian Bobocea. 2016. The new deterrent? International sanctions against Russia over the Ukraine crisis: Impacts, costs and further action. Geneva, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies. Accessed September 21, 2021. https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/294704

Moyer, Homer E., Linda A. Mabry. 1988. Export controls as instruments of foreign policy: The history, legal issues, and policy lessons of three recent cases. Washington, International Law Institute.

Neuwirth, Rostam J., Alexandr Svetlicinii. 2015. “The economic sanctions over the Ukraine conflict and the WTO: ‘Catch-XXI’ and the revival of the debate on security sanctions”. Journal of World Trade 49 (5): 891–914.

Ochhaev, Timur G. 2017. Change and termination of the contract in connection with a significant change of circumstances. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Pape, Robert A. 1997. “Why economic sanctions do not work”. International Security 22 (2): 90–136.

Parry, Clive. 1977. “Defining economic coercion in international law”. Texas International Law Journal 12: 1–4.

Primakov, Denis. 2018. “Sanctions compliance”. Ekonomicheskie sanktsii protiv Rossii: pravovye vyzovy i perspektivy: Sbornik statei. Eds Sergei V. Glandin, Mergen G. Doraev, 2–23. Moscow, Infotropic Media Publ. (In Russian)

Savel’ev, Aleksandr I. 2015. “Unilateral US economic sanctions: A view from US and Russian law”. Zakon 5: 108–131. (In Russian)

Schmidt, Julia. 2022. “The legality of unilateral extra-territorial sanctions under international law”. Journal of Conflict and Security Law 27 (1): 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krac005

Schwenzer, Ingeborg. 2008. “Force majeure and hardship in international sales contracts”. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 39 (4): 709–725.

Seneca. 1995. “On beneficence”. Rus. ed. Rimskie stoiki. Seneka, Epiktet, Mark Avrelii, 14–166. Moscow, Respublika Publ. (In Russian)

Silveira, Mercédeh Azeredo da. 2014. Trade sanctions and international sales: An inquiry into international arbitration and commercial litigation. Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International.

Thier, Andreas. 2011. “Legal history”. Unexpected Circumstances in European Contract Law. Eds Ewoud Hondius, Hans Christoph Grigoleit, 15–32. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763335.005

Ziegler, Charles E. 2020. “Sanctions in U. S. — Russia relations”. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia 20 (3): 504–520. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-3-504-520