Конституционные основы законодательного и подзаконного регулирования в Республике Казахстан: практические вопросы и доктринальное толкование

Ermek B. Abdrasulov

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2022.412

Authors

Ermek B. Abdrasulov L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 2, ul. Satpayeva, Astana, 010000, Republic of Kazakhstan; Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 19, ul. Kabanbai batyra, Astana, 010000, Republic of Kazakhstan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4835-9760

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.412

Abstract

The article examines the issues of differentiation of legislative and subordinate regulation of public relations. It is noted that in the process of law-making activities, including the legislative process, practical questions often arise about the competence of various state bodies to establish various legal norms and rules. These issues are related to the need to establish a clear legal meaning of the constitutional norms devoted to the definition of the subject of regulation of laws. In particular, there is a need to clarify the provisions of paragraph 3 of Art. 61 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan in terms of the concepts “the most important public relations”, “all other relations”, “subsidiary legislation”, as well as to establish the relationship between these concepts. Interpretation is also required by the provisions of paragraph 4 of Art. 61 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan in terms of clarifying the question of whether the conclusion follows from mentioned provisions that all possible social relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan are subject to legal regulation, including those that are subject to other social and technical regulators (morality, national, business and professional traditions and customs, religion, standards, technical regulations, etc.). Answering the questions raised, the author emphasizes that the law and bylaws, as a rule, constitute a single system of legislation, performing the functions of primary and secondary acts. However, the secondary nature of subsidiary legislation does not mean that they regulate “unimportant” public relations. The law is essentially aimed at regulating all important social relations.

Keywords:

constitution, law, subsidiary legislation, legislative regulation, supplementary legal regulation, uncertainty of constitutional norms, interpretation of constitutional norms, parliament, law-making process

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Власенко, Николай А. 2013. «Неопределенность в праве: природа и формы выражения». Журнал российского права 2: 32–44.

Вопленко, Николай Н. 1976. Официальное толкование норм права. М.: Юридическая литература.

Ершов, Валентин В. 2017. Правовое и индивидуальное регулирование общественных отношений. М.: Российский государственный университет правосудия.

Злобин, Александр В. 2012. «Юридическая природа подзаконных нормативных актов в Российской Федерации». Вестник Саратовской юридической академии 5 (88): 34–39.

Иванов, Роман Л. 2011. «Пределы правового регулирования: понятие и виды». Вестник Омского государственного университета. Право 4: 6–18.

Иванов, Станислав А. 2002. Соотношение закона и подзаконного нормативного правового акта Российской Федерации. М.: Народный учитель.

Макарова, Оксана В. 2005. «Судебный контроль судов общей юрисдикции за соответствием нормативных правовых актов федеральных органов исполнительной власти федеральным законам». Дис. … канд. юрид. наук, Институт законодательства и сравнительного правоведения при Правительстве РФ.

Матузов, Николай И. 1996. «Право в системе социальных норм». Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение 2 (213): 144–157.

Овсепян, Жанна И. 2007. «Пробелы и дефекты как категории конституционного права». Конституционное и муниципальное право 15: 10–17.

Пресняков, Михаил В. 2018. «Стабильность и абстрактность Конституции Российской Федерации: конституционный дуализм юридической (формальной) и фактической конституции». Вестник Саратовской государственной юридической академии 5 (124): 15–22.

Реутов, Валерий П., Александр В. Ваньков. 2013. «К вопросу о консолидации как форме систематизации законодательства». Право и современные государства 3: 16–20.

Сафинов, Канатбек Б. 2020. «Подзаконный акт не может выходить за рамки закона, на основе которого он был принят». Nomad. Дата обращения 2 июля, 2022. https://nomad.su/?a=3-202004210025.

Темербеков, Алибек А., Айжан А. Досаева. 2020. «Правовая природа ежегодных посланий Конституционного Совета». Утверждение верховенства права, общечеловеческих ценностей и приоритетов современного государства: деятельность Конституционного Совета РК. Под ред. Кайрата А. Мами, 79–94. Нур-Султан: Деловой мир Астана.

George Forji, Amin. 2010. “The correlation between law and behaviour as pillars of human society”. International Journal of Psychological Studies 6 (3): 84–96.

Whitman, Glen 2009. “The rules of abstraction”. The Review of Austrian Economics 22 (1): 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-008-0064-2

References

Ershov, Valentin V. 2017. Legal and individual regulation of public relations. Moscow, Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi universitet pravosudiia Publ. (In Russian)

George Forji, Amin. 2010. “The correlation between law and behaviour as pillars of human society”. International Journal of Psychological Studies 6 (3): 84–96.

Ivanov, Roman L. 2011. “Limits of legal regulation: The concept and the forms”. Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo 4: 6–18. (In Russian)

Ivanov, Stanislav A. 2002. The ratio of the law and the subordinate regulatory legal act of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Narodnyi uchitel’ Publ. (In Russian)

Makarova, Oksana V. 2005. “Judicial control of courts of general jurisdiction over compliance of regulatory legal acts of federal executive authorities with federal laws”. PhD Thesis in Law, Institut zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniia pri Pravitel’stve RF. (In Russian)

Matuzov, Nikolai I. 1996. “Law in the system of social norms”. Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie 2 (213): 144–157. (In Russian)

Ovsepian, Zhanna I. 2007. “Gaps and defects as categories of constitutional law”. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo 15: 10–17. (In Russian)

Presniakov, Mikhail V. 2018. “Stability and abstractness of the Constitution of the Russian Federation: constitutional dualism of the legal (formal) and actual constitution”. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi akademii 5 (124): 15–22. (In Russian)

Reutov, Valerii P., Aleksandr V. Van’kov. 2013. “On the issue of consolidation as a form of systematization of legislation”. Pravo i sovremennye gosudarstva 3: 16–20. (In Russian)

Safinov, Kanatbek B. 2020. “A by-law cannot go beyond the law on the basis of which it was adopted”. Nomad. Accessed July 2, 2022. https://nomad.su/?a=3-202004210025. (In Russian)

Temerbekov, Alibek A., Aizhan A. Dosaeva. 2020. “The legal nature of the annual messages of the Constitutional Council”. Utverzhdenie verkhovenstva prava, obshchechelovecheskikh tsennostei i prioritetov sovremennogo gosudarstva: deiatel’nost’ Konstitutsionnogo Soveta RK. Ed. by Kayrat A. Mami, 79–94. Nur-Sultan, Delovoi mir Astana Publ. (In Russian)

Vlasenko, Nikolai A. 2013. “Uncertainty in law: the nature and forms of expression”. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 2: 32–44. (In Russian)

Voplenko, Nikolai N. 1976. Official interpretation of the law. Moscow, Iuridicheskaia literatura Publ.(In Russian)

Whitman, Glen 2009. “The rules of abstraction”. The Review of Austrian Economics 22 (1): 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-008-0064-2

Zlobin, Aleksandr V. 2012. “The legal nature of subordinate regulations in the Russian Federation”. Vestnik Saratovskoi iuridicheskoi akademii 5 (88): 34–39. (In Russian)