Участие прокурора в гражданском и административном процессе при защите общественных интересов в Китае

Shaoxue Jia; Yao Li

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2022.111

Authors

Shaoxue Jia Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, 7989, Wai Qingsong Road, Qingpu District, Shanghai, 200333, China https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3159-0387
Yao Li Institute of Comparative Law, China University of Political Science and Law, 25, Xitucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100088, China https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9933-7513

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.111

Abstract

With the rapid development of the economy, violations of public interest, such as environmental pollution, and food and drug safety issues, are increasingly occurring, resulting in the violation of personal rights and enormous losses of property assets for a large number of people. At present, citizens or relevant public organizations are unable to take legal action affecting the public interest to resolve problems, so it is necessary to rely on the prosecution authorities to protect public order and the public interest through the exercise of their prosecutorial powers. The implementation of relevant legislation by prosecutors has achieved considerable results in favor of the protection of public interests, but problems have accordingly arisen in both civil and administrative proceedings for the protection of public interests brought by prosecution authorities. One set of problems is the limitation only to areas of cases specified in law, making the range of cases is narrow; the implementation of prosecutorial supervision leading to difficulties in proving damage to the public interest; and prosecutors’ lack of professional knowledge. The article presents and analyzes the legal framework for prosecutors’ involvement in public interest litigation in China and reveals the causes of the fundamental problems; and suggests ways to improve the current legislation and ways to solve the problems arising by using a modern intelligent judicial system and with the help of relevant administrative authorities in the field of environment and environmental protection, natural resources, food and medicine, consumer protection, and so on.

Keywords:

prosecutors, public interest protection, environmental protection, food safety, evidence, artificial intelligence

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

王万华：《完善检察机关提起行政公益诉讼制度的若干问题》，载《法学杂志》2018年第1期，第96-108页。 [Ван, Ваньхуа. 2018. «Некоторые вопросы совершенствования административного судопроизводства в общественных интересах по инициативе органов прокуратуры». Правовой журнал 1: 96–108].

李成，赵维刚：《困境与突破：行政公益诉讼线索发现机制研究》，载《四川师范大学学报》2018年第4期，第54–61页。[Ли, Чэн, Чжао Вэйган. 2018. «Проблема и путь решения: исследование механизма выявления административных правоотношений в судебных процессах в общественных интересах». Вестник Сычуаньского педагогического университета 4: 54–61].

李伟，林仙芝：《对行政公益诉讼的若干思考——以公益诉讼司法解释第26条的理解为视角》，载《人民司法》2018年第22期，第107–111页。 [Ли, Вэй, Линь Сянчжи. 2018. «Некоторые размышления об административном судопроизводстве в общественных интересах — взгляд на понимание статьи 26 Разъяснения о некоторых вопросах, касающихся применения прокурорами законодательства в судебных делах, связанных с общественными интересами». Народное правосудие 22: 107–111].

栗峥：《人工智能与事实认定》，载《法学研究》2020年第1期，第117–133页。[Ли, Чжэн. 2020. «Искусственный интеллект и установление фактов». Исследование в области юриспруденции 1: 117–133].

姜明安：《完善立法、推进检察机关对行政违法行为的监督》，载《检察日报》2016年３月７日第3版。[Цзян, Минъань. 2016. «Совершенствование законодательства и содействие надзору за административными нарушениями со стороны органов прокуратуры». Ежедневная газета о прокуратуре 7 марта. Дата обращения 25 июня, 2021. https://www.spp.gov.cn/llyj/201603/t20160307_113859.shtml].

崔亚东: 《司法科技梦: 上海刑事案件智能辅助办案系统的实践与思考》，《人民法治》2018 年第18 期，第 92–97 页。 [Цуй, Ядун. 2018. «Мечта о судебной технологии: практика и размышления о шанхайской интеллектуальной вспомогательной судебной системе рассмотрения уголовных дел». Народное право 18: 92–97].

曹明德：《检察院提起公益诉讼面临的困境和推进方向》，载《法学评论》2020年第1期，第118–125页。 [Цао, Миндэ. 2020. «Дилемма, с которой сталкивается прокуратура при возбуждении дел в защиту общественных интересов, и направление продвижения». Юридическое обозрение 1: 118–125].

References

Cao, Mingde. 2020. “The dilemma and direction for advancing public interest litigation by the procuratorate”. Fa xue ping lun 1: 118–125. (In Chinese)

Cui, Yadong. 2018. “Judicial technology dream: Practice and reflections on Shanghai’s intelligent assisted case management system for criminal cases”. Ren min fa zhi 18: 92–97. (In Chinese)

Jiang, Ming’an. 2016 “Improving legislation and promoting supervision of administrative violations by procuratorial organs”. Jian cha ri bao March 7. Accessed June 25, 2021. https://www.spp.gov.cn/llyj/201603/t20160307_113859.shtml. (In Chinese)

Li, Cheng, Zhao Weigang. 2018. “Dilemmas and breakthroughs: a study on the discovery mechanism of administrative public interest litigation clues”. Si chuan shi fan da xue xue bao 1: 54–61. (In Chinese)

Li, Wei, Lin Xianzhi. 2018. “Some reflections on administrative public interest litigation — a perspective on the understanding of Article 26 of the Judicial Interpretation of Public Interest Litigation”. Ren min si fa 22: 107–111. (In Chinese)

Li, Zheng. 2020. “Artificial intelligence and fact finding”. Fa xue yan jiu 1: 117–133. (In Chinese)

Wang, Wanhua. 2018. “Some problems of improving the administrative public interest litigation system initiated by procuratorial organs”. Fa xue za zhi 1: 96–108. (In Chinese)