Impact of digitalization on antitrust regulation and control over economic concentration in the high-tech sector

Authors

  • Maria A. Egorova Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 123242, Russian Federation; Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property, 55a, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, Moscow, 117279, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0227-8845
  • Aleksandr A. Petrov Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 9, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow, 123242, Russian Federation
  • Ol’ga V. Kozhevina Bauman Moscow State Technical University (National Research University), 5, ul. 2-ya Baumanskaya, Moscow, 105005, Russian Federation; Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation, 1-6/1, ul. Ilyinka, Moscow, 109012, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5347-2253

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.203

Abstract

 

The article discusses topical issues of protection and regulation of competition in the markets in the digital business environment. The authors noted that the systems of regulation and law enforcement should be flexibly combined, harmonized in order to develop adequate measures to stimulate fair competition. From the standpoint of adaptation to Russian practice, the foreign experience of the antimonopoly authorities in terms of regulating online markets, price algorithms, and mergers and acquisitions has been studied. The high-tech sector is particularly dynamic. In this regard, the authors draw attention to the fact that in the digital economy of demand, the processes of monopolization, competition persist, but their content is transformed, which complicates the analysis and assessment of monopolization, dominance, competition. Anticompetitive practices can lead to the dominance of a single platform. The signs of the dominant position of digital platforms are revealed. Based on the regulatory and legal approach, the article summarizes the Russian and foreign experience of qualifying economic concentration and dominant position, identifies negative factors that cause the expansion of regulatory control of antimonopoly authorities over digital platforms. The legal nature of digital platforms, direct and indirect network effects have been studied in detail. It has been proven that algorithms can serve as collusion tools in both horizontal and vertical agreements. From the standpoint of economic research methods, an overview of the assessment of the dominant position of antimonopoly authorities in the digital economy is carried out, it is noted that the preconditions have been created for the formation of a platform economy. The features of the antitrust policy in relation to digital platforms in Russia, the European Union and the United States are considered. It is concluded that antitrust legislation in recent years has become a powerful regulatory tool at the level of different jurisdictions.

Keywords:

economic concentration, competition, antitrust regulation, digitalization, hightech sector, digital platforms, price algorithms

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Егорова, Мария А. 2018. «Особенности нормативного регулирования цифровой экономики и проблемы антимонопольного регулирования на цифровых рынках как средство защиты национальных интересов». Юрист. 11: 7–10.

Петров, Дмитрий А., Мария А. Егорова, Александр Ю. Кинев. 2016. Экономическая концентрация: опыт экономико-правового исследования рыночных и юридических конструкций. М.: Юстицинформ.

Петросян, Давид C. 2018. Институциональная экономика. Управление формированием и развитием социально-экономических институтов. М.: ИНФРА-М.

Свэнт, Марти. 2020. «Самые дорогие бренды мира 2020 года по версии Forbes». Forbes. Дата обращения 30 марта, 2021. https://www.forbes.ru/biznes/405947-samye-dorogie-brendy-mira-2020-godapo-versii-forbes.

Цариковский, Андрей Ю., Алексей Ю. Иванов, Елена А. Войникас, ред. 2018. Антимонопольное регулирование в цифровую эпоху. Как защищать конкуренцию в эпоху глобализации и четвертой промышленной революции. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ.

Arts, Dirk. 2020. “Antitrust in focus”. Allen & Overy. Дата обращения 1 марта, 2021. https://www.allenovery.com/en-gb/global/news-and-insights/publications/antitrust-in-focus-december-2020.

Belk, Russell. 2014. “You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online”. Journal of Business Research 67: 1595–1600.

Botsman, Rachel, Roo Rogers. 2011. What’s mine is yours: How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live. London: Collins.

Chen, Zishu. 2020. “Why the platform economy can unlock prosperity for billions of workers”. World Economic Forum. Дата обращения 4 апреля, 2021. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/11/digitalization-platform-economy-covid-recovery.

Coyle, Diane. 2015. “The hobbit approach to the sharing economy”. Financial Times. Дата обращения 3 апреля, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/80e4682c-a966-11e5-9700-2b669a5aeb83.

Evans, David S., Richard Schmalensee. 2016. Matchmakers: The new economics of multi-sided platforms. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

Graf, Thomas, Henry Mostyn. 2020. “The dominance and monopolies review: European Union”. The Law Reviews. Дата обращения 21 февраля, 2021. https://thelawreviews.co.uk/edition/1001512/the-dominance-and-monopolies-review-edition-8.

Hermes, Sebastian, Simon Pfab, Andreas Hein, Jörg Weking. 2020. “Digital platforms and market dominance: Insights from a systematic literature review and avenues for future research”. Conference: 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Information System (PACIS) 5: 1–42.

Lehdonvirta, Vili. 2018. “Platform work: Now and in the future”. EU Agenda. Дата обращения 4 апреля, 2021. https://euagenda.eu/upload/publications/untitled-152869-ea.pdf.

Lehdonvirta, Vili, Otto Kässi, Isis Hjorth, Helena Barnard, Mark Graham. 2018. “The global platform economy: A new offshoring institution enabling emerging-economy microproviders”. Journal of Management 10 (20): 1–33.

Mokronosov, Alexander G. 2020. “Digital platform: Antitrust approaches”. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research 138: 1126–1129.

Strowel, Alain, Wouter Vergote. 2018. “Digital platforms: To regulate or not to regulate?” European Commission. Дата обращения 5 апреля, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/image/document/2016-7/uclouvain_et_universit_saint_louis_14044.pdf.

References

Arts, Dirk. 2020. “Antitrust in focus”. Allen & Overy. Accessed March 1, 2021. https://www.allenovery.com/en-gb/global/news-and-insights/publications/antitrust-in-focus-december-2020.

Belk, Russell. 2014. “You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online”. Journal of Business Research 67: 1595–1600.

Botsman, Rachel, Roo Rogers. 2011. What’s mine is yours: How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live. London: Collins.

Chen, Zishu. 2020. “Why the platform economy can unlock prosperity for billions of workers”. World Economic Forum. Accessed April 4, 2021. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/11/digitalization-platform-economy-covid-recovery.

Coyle, Diane. 2015. “The hobbit approach to the sharing economy”. Financial Times. Accessed April 3, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/80e4682c-a966-11e5-9700-2b669a5aeb83.

Egorova, Maria A. 2018. “Peculiarities of regulatory regulation of the digital economy and problems of antitrust regulation in digital markets as a means of protecting national interests”. Iurist 11: 7–10. (In Russian)

Evans, David S., Richard Schmalensee. 2016. Matchmakers: The new economics of multi-sided platforms. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

Graf, Thomas, Henry Mostyn. 2020. “The dominance and monopolies review: European Union”. The Law Reviews. Accessed February 24, 2021. https://thelawreviews.co.uk/edition/1001512/the-dominance-and-monopolies-review-edition-8.

Hermes, Sebastian, Simon Pfab, Andreas Hein, Jörg Weking. 2020. “Digital platforms and market dominance: Insights from a systematic literature review and avenues for future research”. Conference: 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Information System (PACIS) 5: 1–42.

Lehdonvirta, Vili. 2018. “Platform work: Now and in the future”. EU Agenda. Accessed April 4, 2021. https://euagenda.eu/upload/publications/untitled-152869-ea.pdf.

Lehdonvirta, Vili, Otto Kässi, Isis Hjorth, Helena Barnard, Mark Graham. 2018. “The global platform economy: A new offshoring institution enabling emerging-economy microproviders”. Journal of Management 10 (20): 1–33.

Mokronosov, Alexander G. 2020. “Digital platform: Antitrust approaches”. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research 138: 1126–1129.

Petrosian, David C. 2018. Institutional economics. Management of the formation and development of socioeconomic institutions. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ. (In Russian)

Petrov, Dmitrii A., Maria A. Egorova, Aleksandr Iu. Kinev. 2016. Economic concentration: The experience of economic and legal research of market and legal structures. Moscow, Iustitsinform Publ. (In Russian)

Strowel, Alain, Wouter Vergote. 2018. “Digital platforms: To regulate or not to regulate?” European Commission. Accessed April 5, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/image/document/2016-7/uclouvain_et_universit_saint_louis_14044.pdf.

Svant, Marty. 2020. “The most expensive brands in 2020. The Forbes ranking”. Forbes. Accessed March 30, 2021. https://www.forbes.ru/biznes/405947-samye-dorogie-brendy-mira-2020-goda-po-versii-forbes(In Russian)

Tsarikovskii, Andrei Iu., Aleksei Iu. Ivanov, Elena A. Voinikas, eds. 2018. Antitrust regulation in the digital age. How to protect competition in the era of globalization and the fourth industrial revolution. Moscow, HSE Publishing House. (In Russian)

Published

2022-07-28

How to Cite

Egorova, M. A., Petrov, A. A., & Kozhevina, O. V. (2022). Impact of digitalization on antitrust regulation and control over economic concentration in the high-tech sector. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 13(2), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.203

Issue

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research