Гемопоэтические стволовые клетки пуповинной (плацентарной) крови как объект гражданских прав

Kseniya I. Korobko

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2023.207

Authors

Kseniya I. Korobko Syktyvkar State University named after Pitirim Sorokin, 55, Oktyabrsky pr., Syktyvkar, Republic of Komi, 167001, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1355-4083

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.207

Abstract

The article examines the problems of civil law regime of hematopoietic stem cells of umbilical cord (placental) blood. Currently, hematopoietic stem cells of umbilical cord (placental) blood, as well as other human biological objects are not legally classified as objects of civil rights. As part of the study, the author conducted an analysis of hematopoietic stem cells of umbilical cord (placenta) blood in the context of their attribution to civil rights objects, for which they were studied in the refraction of such properties (attributes) of civil rights objects as discreteness, legal binding and consistency. Based on the analysis, it was found that the examined cells correspond to the properties (attributes) of objects of civil rights and therefore can be classified as such. One of the key problems arising in law enforcement is the determination of the owner of these cells. To answer this question, the author has analysed the legal position of the child’s father, the child’s mother and the child himself, taking into account medical advances. It is concluded that both mother and child have rights to these cages and they are subject to the regime of joint ownership. It is argued that the ownership of hematopoietic stem cells arises at the time of isolation of their concentrate from the umbilical cord (placental) blood. Considering the contractual regulation of legal relations in the use of hematopoietic stem cells of umbilical cord (placenta) blood, taking into account that their collection, transportation and storage are types of works (services) constituting medical activities, it is concluded that these activities should be carried out in accordance with Chapter 39 “Gratuitous provision of services” of the Civil Code. In terms of storage of isolated cells, the rules of Chapter 47 “Storage” of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation may be applied subsidiarily

Keywords:

hematopoietic stem cells, cord blood, placental blood, medical activity, transplantation, object of civil rights, ownership

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Аполинская, Нина В. 2009. «Биологические объекты человека в гражданском праве Российской Федерации». Дис. … канд. юрид. наук, Юридический институт Иркутского государственного университета.

Гончарова, Антонина В. 2016. «Сравнительный анализ объектов гражданских прав и объектов гражданских правоотношений». Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Сер. 5. Юриспруденция 4 (33): 68–71.

Коган, Яна Э. 2016. «Патология пуповины и ее роль в перинатальных осложнениях». Практическая медицина 1 (93): 22–25.

Кожемякин, Дмитрий В. 2019. Доменное имя в системе объектов гражданских прав. М.: Проспект.

Лапач, Владимир А. 2002. «Система объектов гражданских прав в законодательстве России». Дис. … д-ра юрид. наук, Ростовский юридический институт Северо-Кавказской академии государственной службы.

Лысенко, Александр Н. 2007. «Понятие и виды имущества в гражданском праве России». Дис. … канд. юрид. наук, Самарcкий государственный университет.

Малеина, Марина Н. 2003. «Статус органов, тканей, тела человека как объекта права собственности и прав на физическую неприкосновенность». Законодательство 11: 13–20. СПС «Гарант». Дата обращения 1 марта, 2023. https://base.garant.ru/4083995/?ysclid=lf7xlgz1vt448048934.

Смирнова, Татьяна Л. 2009. «Плацента. Этапы развития». Вестник Чувашского университета 2: 73–79.

Солоницына, Любовь А. Сергей В. Сазонов, Сергей Л. Леонтьев. 2013. «Проблемы правового регулирования забора пуповинной крови». Клеточная трансплантология и клеточная инженерия 4: 91–94.

Суслова, Светлана И. 2020. «Непоименованность в гражданском праве». Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки 2: 322–347. http://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2020-48-322-347

Трапезникова, Анна В. 2010. «Наследование обязательной доли». Дис. … канд. юрид. наук, Южно-Уральский государственный университет.

Трубина, Виолетта А. 2020. «Ткани и органы человека как объекты гражданских прав». Дис. … канд. юрид. наук, Институт законодательства и сравнительного правоведения при Правительстве РФ.

Шабанова, Анастасия С. 2019. «Правовое положение донорского репродуктивного материала». Вопросы российского и международного права = Matters of Russian and International Law 7A: 82–90. Дата обращения 1 марта, 2023. http://publishing-vak.ru/file/archive-law-2019-7/10-shabanova.pdf.

Шмитько, Анна Д. Светлана В. Новикова, Ирина И. Бочарова, Анна А. Якубина, Михаил П. Костинов. 2014. «Механизмы и факторы, влияющие на трансплацентарную передачу антител класса IgG в системе мать — плацента — плод». Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога 14 (6): 27–31. Дата обращения 14 апреля, 2021. https://www.mediasphera.ru/issues/rossijskij-vestnik-akushera-ginekologa/2014/6/031726-6122201466.

Devine, Karen. 2017. The umbilical cord blood controversies in medical law. London; New York, Routledge.

Munzer, Stephen R. 1999. “The special case of property rights in umbilical cord blood for transplantation”. Rutgers Law Review Spring 51 (3): 493–568.

Seema, Mohapatra. 2013. “Cutting the cord to private cord blood banking: Encouraging compensation for public cord blood donations after Flynn v. Holder”. University of Colorado Law Review 84: 933–983.

Sun, Changbin, Yue Jianhui, He Na, Liu Yaqiong, Zhang Xi, Zhang Yong. 2016. “Fundamental principles of stem cell banking”. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 951: 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45457-3_3

References

Apolinskaia, Nina V. 2009. “Human biological objects in the civil law of the Russian Federation”. PhD Thesis in Law, Iuridicheskii institut Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. (In Russian)

Devine, Karen. 2017. The umbilical cord blood controversies in medical law. London; New York, Routledge.

Goncharova, Antonina V. 2016. “Comparative analysis of objects of civil rights and objects of civil legal relations”. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 5. Iurisprudentsiia 4 (33): 68–71. (In Russian)

Kogan, Iana E. 2016. “Umbilical cord pathology and its role in perinatal complications”. Prakticheskaia meditsina 1 (93): 22–25

Kozhemiakin, Dmitrii V. 2019. Domain name in the civil rights system. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. (In Russian)

Lapach, Vladimir A. 2002. “The system of objects of civil rights in the legislation of Russia”. Dr. Sci. Thesis in Law, Rostovskii iuridicheskii institut Severo-Kavkazskoi akademii gosudarstvennoi sluzhby. (In Russian)

Lysenko, Aleksandr N. 2007. “The concept and types of property in the civil law of Russia”. PhD Thesis in Law, Samarckii gosudarstvennyi universitet. (In Russian)

Maleina, Marina N. 2003. “The status of organs, tissues, the human body as an object of property rights and rights to physical integrity”. Zakonodatel’stvo 11: 13–20. SPS “Garant”. Accessed March 1, 2023. https://base.garant.ru/4083995/?ysclid=lf7xlgz1vt448048934. (In Russian)

Munzer, Stephen R. 1999. “The special case of property rights in umbilical cord blood for transplantation”. Rutgers Law Review Spring 51 (3): 493–568.

Seema, Mohapatra. 2013. “Cutting the cord to private cord blood banking: Encouraging compensation for public cord blood donations after Flynn v. Holder”. University of Colorado Law Review 84: 933–983.

Shabanova, Anastasiia S. 2019. “Legal status of donor reproductive material”. Voprosy rossiiskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava = Matters of Russian and International Law 7A: 82–90. Accessed April 14, 2021. http://publishing-vak.ru/file/archive-law-2019-7/10-shabanova.pdf. (In Russian)

Shmit’ko, Anna D. Svetlana V. Novikova, Irina I. Bocharova, Anna A. Iakubina, Mikhail P. Kostinov. 2014. “Mechanisms and factors affecting the transplacental transmission of IgG antibodies in the mother — placenta — fetus system”. Rossiiskii vestnik akushera-ginekologa 14 (6): 27–31. Accessed March 1, 2023. https://www.mediasphera.ru/issues/rossijskij-vestnik-akushera-ginekologa/014/6/031726-6122201466. (In Russian)

Smirnova, Tat’iana L. 2009. “Placenta. Stages of development”. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta 2: 73–79.(In Russian)

Solonitsyna, Liubov’ A., Sergei V. Sazonov, Sergei L. Leont’ev. 2013. “Problems of legal regulation of umbilical cord blood sampling”. Kletochnaia transplantologiia i kletochnaia inzheneriia 4: 91–94. (In Russian)

Sun, Changbin, Yue, Jianhui, He, Na, Liu, Yaqiong, Zhang Xi, Zhang, Yong. 2016. “Fundamental principles of stem cell banking”. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 951: 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45457-3_3

Suslova, Svetlana I. 2020. “Namelessness in civil law”. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Iuridicheskie nauki 2: 322–347. http://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2020-48-322-347 (In Russian)

Trapeznikova, Anna V. 2010. “Mandatory share inheritance”. PhD Thesis in Law, Iuzhno-Ural’skii gosudarstvennyi universitet. (In Russian)

Trubina, Violetta A. 2020. “Human tissues and organs as objects of civil rights”. PhD Thesis in Law, Institut zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniia pri Pravitel’stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii. (In Russian)