Transforming the prohibition of torture in the context of rising terrorist threats
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.302Abstract
The article explores the content of the prohibition of torture in constitutional and international acts. The ban is absolute, as confirmed by the extensive practice of international human rights organizations. At present, a revision of the general attitude towards torture in Western Europe is taking place against the background of increasing terrorist threats. In the United States, after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack, at the level of Justice Department directives, certain methods of “intensive interrogation” were allowed in order to obtain information from persons captured during anti-terrorist operations. It was assumed that in the conditions of the “war on terror”, terrorists were not subject to the privileges provided for by the Geneva Conventions in relation to prisoners of war. Our study involves an analysis of a wide range of sources on problems of the use of torture in the context of countering terrorism, and provides an analysis of foreign scientific discussions of the admissibility of torture against terrorists. One argument is the lack of moral boundaries among terrorists themselves, capable of committing deadly attacks against civilians. Supporters of the use of torture proceed from the principle of extreme necessity for obtaining information about the planned terrorist acts. Opponents of torture proceed from the principle of the moral absolute, which does not justify attaining a goal by any means. In modern legal science there is a search for a balance of interests: the dignity of a person suspected of preparing a terrorist act, and the safety of other citizens, society, and the state.
Keywords:
torture, human dignity, prohibition, ticking bomb, constitutional value, terrorism, threat
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Библиография
Владимиров, Леонид Е. 1910. Учение об уголовных доказательствах. СПб.: Законоведение.
Вольтер, Франсуа Мари. 1956. «О пытке». Вольтер, Франсуа Мари. Избранные произведения по уголовному праву и процессу. Под ред. Алексея Герцензона, 79–80. М.: Госюриздат.
Вышинский, Андрей Я. 1941. Теория судебных доказательств в советском праве. М.: НКЮ СССР.
Дершовиц, Алан. 2011. Слово в защиту Израиля. М.: Текст.
Канторович, Яков. 1896. Средневековые процессы о ведьмах. СПб.: Издание Я. А. Канторовича.
Крамер, Генрих, Яков Шпренгер. 2017. Молот ведьм. М.: Эксмо.
Ланглуа, Шарль В. 1903. Инквизиция по новейшим трудам. СПб.: М. и С. Сабашниковы.
Сергеевич, Василий И. 1910. Лекции и исследования по древней истории русского права. СПб.: Типография М. М. Стасюлевича.
Троицкая, Александра. 2015. «Пределы прав и абсолютные права: за рамками принципа пропорциональности? Теоретические вопросы и практика Конституционного Суда РФ». Сравнительное конституционное обозрение 2: 45–69.
Трубецкой, Евгений Н. 1917. Лекции по энциклопедии права. М.: Товарищество типографии А. И. Мамонтова.
Allen, Мike, Dana Priest. 2004. “Memo on torture draws focus to Bush. Aide says president set guidelines for interrogations, not specific techniques”. Washington Post. Дата обращения 20 декабря, 2020. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26401-2004Jun8.html?noredirect=on.
Alter, Jonathan. 2001. “Time to think about torture”. Newsweek. Дата обращения 20 декабря, 2020. https://www.newsweek.com/time-think-about-torture-149445.
Curzer, Howard J. 2006. “Admirable immorality, dirty hands, ticking bombs, and torturing innocents”. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (1): 31–56.
Dershowitz, Аlan. 2002. Why terrorism works: Understanding the threat, responding to the challenge. London: Yale University Press.
Evans, Rebecca. 2007. “The ethics of torture”. Human Rights & Human Welfare 7: 53–66.
Fearon, James D. 2003. “Catastrophic terrorism and civil liberties in the short and long run”. The symposium on “Constitutions, Democracy, and the Rule of Law”, Columbia University’s 250th anniversary celebrations. Дата обращения 20 декабря, 2020. http://ci.columbia.edu/ci/c250/symposia/constitutions/constitutions_vid_archive.html.
Honeywood, Christian A. 2016. “Britain’s approach to balancing counter-terrorism laws with human rights”. Journal of Strategic Security 9 (3): 28–48.
Ignatieff, Michael. 2004. The lesser evil: Political ethics in an age of terror. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ignatieff, Michael. 2006. “If torture works…” Prospect. Дата обращения 20 декабря, 2020. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/iftortureworks.
McLaughlin, Аbraham. 2001. “How far Americans would go to fight terror”. Christian Science Monitor. Дата обращения 28 декабря, 2020. https://www.csmonitor.com/2001/1114/p1s3-usju.html.
Meisels, Tamar. 2008. “Torture and the problem of dirty hands”. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 21: 149–173.
Nye, Joseph S. Jr. 2005. Understanding international conflicts: An introduction to theory and history. 5th ed. New York: Pearson.
Posner, Richard A. 2006. Not a suicide pact: The constitution in a time of national emergency (inalienable rights). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Renke, Wayne N. 2003. “Book reviews: Why terrorism works: Understanding the threat, responding to the challenge, Alan M. Dershowitz”. Alberta Law Review. Special Issue: Globalization and the Law 41 (3): 771–796.
Reza, Sadiq. 2007. “Torture and Islamic law”. Chicago Journal of International Law 8 (1): 21–41.
Segev, Re’em. 2009. “Balancing, Judicial review, and disobedience: Comments on Richard Posner’s analysis of anti-terror measures (not a suicide pact)”. Israel Law Review 42 (2): 234–247.
Shue, Henry.1978. “Torture”. Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (2): 124–143.
Walzer, Michael. 1973. “Political action: The problem of dirty hands”. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2 (2): 160–180.
References
Allen, Мike, Dana Priest. 2004. “Memo on torture draws focus to Bush. Aide says president set guidelines for interrogations, not specific techniques”. Washington Post. Accessed December 20, 2020. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26401-2004Jun8.html?noredirect=on.
Alter, Jonathan. 2001. “Time to think about torture”. Newsweek. Accessed December 20, 2020. https://www.newsweek.com/time-think-about-torture-149445.
Curzer, Howard J. 2006. “Admirable immorality, dirty hands, ticking bombs, and torturing innocents”. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (1): 31–56.
Dershowitz, Аlan. 2002. Why terrorism works: Understanding the threat, responding to the challenge. London, Yale University Press.
Dershowitz, Аlan. 2011. A Word for Israel. Moscow, Tekst Publ. (In Russian)
Evans, Rebecca.2007. “The ethics of torture”. Human Rights & Human Welfare 7: 53–66.
Fearon, James D. 2003. “Catastrophic terrorism and civil liberties in the short and long run”. The symposium on “Constitutions, Democracy, and the Rule of Law”, Columbia University’s 250th anniversary celebrations. Accessed December 20, 2020. http://ci.columbia.edu/ci/c250/symposia/constitutions/constitutions_vid_archive.html.
Honeywood, Christian A. 2016. “Britain’s approach to balancing counter-terrorism laws with human rights”. Journal of Strategic Security 9 (3): 28–48.
Ignatieff, Michael. 2004. The lesser evil: Political ethics in an age of terror. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Ignatieff, Michael. 2006. “If torture works…” Prospect. Accessed December 20, 2020. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/iftortureworks.
Kantorovich, Iakob. 1896. Medieval witch trials. St Petersburg, Ia. A. Kantorovich Publ. (In Russian)
Kramer, Genrikh, Iakob Shprenger. 2017. Hammer of the witches. Moscow, Eksmo Publ. (In Russian)
Langlua, Sharl’V. 1903. Inquisition on the latest writings. St Petersburg, M. i S. Sabashnikovy Publ. (In Russian)
McLaughlin, Аbraham. 2001. “How far Americans would go to fight terror”. Christian Science Monitor. Accessed December 28, 2020. https://www.csmonitor.com/2001/1114/p1s3-usju.html.
Meisels, Tamar. 2008. “Torture and the problem of dirty hands”. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 21: 149–173.
Nye, Joseph S. Jr. 2005. Understanding international conflicts: An introduction to theory and history. 5th ed. New York, Pearson.
Posner, Richard A. 2006. Not a suicide pact: The constitution in a time of national emergency (inalienable rights). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Renke, Wayne N. 2003. “Book reviews: Why terrorism works: Understanding the threat, responding to the challenge, Alan M. Dershowitz”. Alberta Law Review. Special Issue: Globalization and the Law 41 (3): 771–796.
Reza, Sadiq. 2007. “Torture and Islamic law”. Chicago Journal of International Law 8 (1): 21–41.
Segev, Re’em. 2009. “Balancing, Judicial review, and disobedience: Comments on Richard Posner’s analysis of anti-terror measures (not a suicide pact)”. Israel Law Review 42 (2): 234–247.
Sergeevich, Vasilii I. 1910. Lectures and research on the ancient history of Russian law. St Petersburg, Tipografiia M. M. Stasiulevicha Publ. (In Russian)
Shue, Henry.1978. “Torture”. Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (2): 124–143.
Troitskaia, Aleksandra. 2015. “Limits of rights and absolute rights: Beyond the principle of proportionality? Theoretical issues and practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation”. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie 2: 45–69. (In Russian)
Trubetskoi, Evgenii N. 1917. Lectures on the encyclopedia of law. Moscow, Tovarishchestvo tipografii A. I. Mamontova Publ. (In Russian)
Vladimirov, Leonid E. 1910. The doctrine of criminal evidence. St Petersburg, Zakonovedenie Publ. (In Russian)
Vol’ter, Fransua Mari. 1956. “About torture”. Vol’ter, Fransua Mari. Izbrannye proizvedeniia po ugolovnomu pravu i protsessu. Ed. by Aleksei Gertsenzon, 79–80. Moscow, Gosiurizdat Publ. (In Russian)
Vyshinskii, Andrei Ia. 1941. The theory of judicial evidence in Soviet law. Moscow, NKIu SSSR Publ. (In Russian)
Walzer, Michael. 1973. “Political action: The problem of dirty hands”. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2 (2): 160–180.
Downloads
Published
2022-09-22
How to Cite
Romanovsky, G. B., & Romanovsky, V. G. (2022). Transforming the prohibition of torture in the context of rising terrorist threats. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 13(3), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.302
Issue
Section
Public and Private Law: Applied Research
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
