Confiscation and other procedures for deprivation of illegally acquired (criminal) proceeds under the laws of Russia and foreign jurisdictions

Авторы

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.414%20

Аннотация

The article focuses on the problems of effective combating profit-driven crimes and the implementation of the “crime does not pay” principle in the Russian legislation. The author analyzes the existing civil and criminal mechanisms for the return of assets in Russia, as well as the issues of a special unexplained wealth procedure. The paper reveals the deficiencies of each instrument that result in practical challenges, faced by law enforcement agencies, the judiciary and victims, while restoring the situation that existed prior to commission of a crime. In the search for possible solutions to the problems, legal acts of the European Union, international conventions and the legislation of the certain jurisdictions (Germany and the United States) were reviewed in order to explore the alternative procedures for reducing the “profitability” of economically-motivated crimes and compensating victims. In particular, the article considers non-conviction-based confiscation models, their expansion and application conditions, maintaining balance between confiscation of assets and the interests of victims, as well as certain aspects of post-conviction assets tracing and confiscation. In conclusion, the author introduces the concept of modernizing the confiscation system in the Russian Federation, differentiating between evidentiary standards used to determine a person’s guilt and to confiscate illegally acquired assets, with reference to foreign experience in using confiscated property to compensate for damage caused by a crime; proposes supplements to the criminal procedure law providing for the application of extended and independent confiscation; identifies possible outlines of the institution to sever “criminal case against assets” from “criminal case against a person” when the latter is referred to the court (in respect of the highly profitable crimes).

Ключевые слова:

confiscation, forfeiture, restitution, asset recovery, corruption, drug trafficking, victim, organized crime

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Библиографические ссылки

References

Bavsun, M. V., K. D. Nikolayev, S. Yu. Samoylova. 2019. Confiscation of property in Russian criminal legislation. Moscow, Iurlitiform Publ. (In Russian)

Belyaeva, Y. L. 2020. “Legal framework for confiscation of proceeds derived from corruption crimes in the European Union”. Gumanitarnye, sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie i obshhestvennye nauki 10: 102–105. (In Russian)

Boucht, J. 2017. The limits of asset confiscation: On the legitimacy of extended appropriation of criminal proceeds. Oxford; Portland, Hart Publ.

Brun, J. P., A. Sotiropoulou, L. Gray, C. Scott, K. M. Stephenson. 2020. Asset recovery handbook: A guide for practitioners. StAR Initiative. Washington, Worldbank.

Burchard, C. 2019. “Confiscation as criminal law (or what) on how the ill-advised discussion about ‘the’ legal ‘nature’ of confiscation obfuscates what really needs to be discussed”. Latin American Legal Studies 4: 211–242. https://doi.org/10.15691/0719-9112Vol4a3

Cohen, M. A. 2000. “Measuring the costs and benefits of crime and justice”. Criminal Justice. Measurement and analysis of crime and justice. Ed. by D. Duffee 4: 263–315. Washington, D. C., National Institute of Justice.

Gladkikh, V. I. 2021. “Illegal banking (Art. 172 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation): Theory and practice”. Bankovskoe pravo 5: 38–44. (In Russian)

Iani, P. S. 2006. “Application of confiscation norms”. Rossiiskaia iustitsiia 12: 32–36. (In Russian)

Kapinus, O. S., ed. 2021. Legal framework and experience of cooperation with foreign countries in the field of tracing, freezing, confiscation of criminal proceeds and asset recovery. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. (In Russian)

Kaufmann, Annelie. 2019. “Reform scheint sich zu bewahren”. Legal Tribune Online. Accessed November 6, 2024. https://www.lto.de/recht/justiz/j/vermoegensabschoepfung-straftaten-staatsanwaltschaftenreform-in-der-praxis-bewaehrt/.

Kayumova, A. F. 2018. “Practice of applying in rem confiscation in developed foreign countries”. Rossiiskaia pravovaia sistema v kontekste obespecheniia prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina: teoriia i praktika: sbornik materialov konferentsii, Kurgan, 1 dekabria 2017 g. , 229–247. Kurgan, Kurganskii gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)

Klyuchnikov, A. Yu. 2017. “Extended confiscation in France and England”. Nauchnyi vestnik Omskoi akademii MVD Rossii 4 (67): 30–33. (In Russian)

Lafitskiy, V. I., ed. 2014. Prospects for applying of freezing, restraining, confiscation of criminal assets and management of confiscated assets mechanisms. Moscow, Institut zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniia pri Pravitel’stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii Publ.; MUMTsFM Publ. (In Russian)

Levin, S. C., S. Ramachandran. 2013. “The interplay between forfeiture and restitution in complex multivictim white-collar cases”. Federal Sentencing Reporter 26 (1): 10–18.

Mei.ner, M. 2017. “Die Reform der strafrechtlichen Vermogensabschopfung — ein Ehrgeizprojekt oder: Hoher, schneller, weiter… das neue Abschopfungsrecht aus Sicht des Strafverteidigers”. Kriminalpolitische Zeitschrift (KriPoz) 4: 237–243.

Mujanović, E., D. Datzer, eds. 2020. Handbook on effective asset recovery in compliance with European and international standards. Strengthening anti-corruption in the South East Europe through improving asset seizure measures. AIRE/RAI Publ. Accessed November 6, 2024. https://www.rai-see.org/php_sets/uploads/2020/11/Handbook-asset_recovery_eng-1.pdf.

Shatailyuk, E. E. 2021. “Criminal prosecution of money laundering cases in the Russian Federation: Challenges and FATF fourth round of mutual evaluations”. Ugolovno-pravovoe vozdeistvie na biznes. Eds. E. Sidorenko, A. Volevodz, K. Klevtsov, O. Semykina, 321–327. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. (In Russian)

Skoblikov, P. A. 2018. “Ruling of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on confiscation of property: Critical analysis”. Zakon 9: 122–132. (In Russian)

Vinberg, A. I., R. D. Rakhunov. 1947. Indirect evidence in criminal cases. Moscow, Iuridicheskoe izdatel’stvo Publ. (In Russian)

Загрузки

Опубликован

28.12.2024

Как цитировать

Shatailyuk, E. E. (2024). Confiscation and other procedures for deprivation of illegally acquired (criminal) proceeds under the laws of Russia and foreign jurisdictions. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право, 15(4), 1132–1152. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.414

Выпуск

Раздел

Сравнительное право