Development of legal-tech prospects in the Federal Republic of Iraq: The predictive justice in Anglo-Saxon and Latin perspectives

Авторы

  • Fahil Abdulbasit A. Abdulkareem Duhok Polytechnic University, 61, Zakho Road, 1006 Mazi Qr Duhok, 42001, Kurdistan — Iraq https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5204-0421

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.413

Аннотация

The research presents an academic study which examines according to a deep critico-analytical approach, one of the most controversial modernist issues in Western jurisprudence circles, specifically French, and by which we mean the reality of judicial justice in the digital age according to the concept “Predictive Justice”, and the consequent effect of this justice on judicial justice within the legal justice system in legislation. The French system, with the highlighting the Anglo-Saxon experiences, this is according to a research scheme that presents in its first section the opportunities which offering by this concept to the judicial justice system as a whole, especially in light of strengthening the principle of Democracy of Justice; and in its second section, the challenges which this concept poses to this traditional justice system and the fear that it could remould the judicial justice system digitally and regionally, concluding research with a set of results and recommendations, which stimulates the Iraqi criminal legislator with a scientific mechanism to introduce the Predictive Justice to the Iraqi criminal doctrine. The research shows the state of anxiety and anticipation that prevails in this new justice concept in the French legal environment, explains the concept of Glass Justice, Digital Computational Justice, and Capitalist Justice, as well as the fear of stereotyping judicial work with a duplicate digital template, and modelling justice with the Anglo-Saxon’s justice features(source and identity).

Ключевые слова:

predictive justice, algorithmic criminology, democracy of justice, big data, artificial intelligence, machine learning

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Библиографические ссылки

References

Aletras, Nikolaos, Dimitrios Tsarapatsanis, Daniel Preoţiuc-Pietro, Vasileios Lampos. 2016. “Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A natural language processing perspective”. Peer Journal Computer Science 2: e93. Accessed June 29, 2023. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.93

Al-Khatib, Muhammad Irfan. 2018a. “Robots Legal Center: Personality and responsibility. A Comparative study: A reading of the European Rules for the Civil Law of Robots 2017”. Mjlt klyt alqanwn alkwytyt alalmyt 6: 97–136. Accessed June 29, 2023. https://journal.kilaw.edu.kw/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/97-136.pdf. (In Arabic)

Al-Khatib, Muhammad Irfan. 2018b. “Guarantees of the right in the digital age: From changing concept to changing protection. A reading of the European and French legislative position and a projection on the Kuwaiti legislative position”. Mjlt klyt alqanwn alkwytyt alalmyt 6: 251–324. Accessed June 29, 2023. https://journal.kilaw.edu.kw/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/251-324-Arfan-alkteeb-2.pdf. (In Arabic)

Bayamlıoğlu, Emre, Ronald Leenes. 2018. “The ‘rule of law’ implications of data-driven decision-making: A techno-regulatory perspective”. Law, Innovation and Technology 10 (2): 295–313. Accessed June 29, 2023. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/17579961.2018.1527475?needAccess=true&role=button.

Blackman, Josh, Adam Aft, Corey Carpenter. 2012. “Fantasy SCOTUS: Crowdsourcing a Prediction Market for the Supreme Court”. Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property 10 (3). Accessed June 29, 2023. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1160&context=njtip.

Brester, Aleksandr A., Elena A. Iurishina. 2018. “Criteria underlying decision making on punishment: Law enforcement practice empirical analysis”. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo 9 (4): 535–553. Accessed June 29, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2018.406 (In Russian)

Brynjolfsson, Erik, Andrew McAfee. 2014. “The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies”. New York, London, W. W. Norton & Company. Accessed June 29, 2023. https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4312922/mod_resource/content/2/Erik%20-%20The%20Second%20Machine%20Age.pdf.

Delacroix, Sylvie. 2018. “Computer systems fit for the legal profession?” Legal Ethics 21 (2): 119–135. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2018.1551702

Diallo, Ibrahima. 2020. “Les enjeux de la justice prédictive”. HAL open science. Accessed July 1, 2023, https://hal.science/hal-02563645/document.

Faisal, Mohammed Al-Buhairi. 2015. The Impact of the Modern Scientific Renaissance on Legal Thought. A Study in the Philosophy of Law. Egypt, Markaz al-Dirāsāt al-ʻArabīyah lil-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʻ. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://platform.almanhal.com/Reader/Book/56334. (In Arabic)

Haller, Stephan. 2010. “The things in the Internet of things”. RFID Journal. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228488111_The_Things_in_the_Internet_of_Things.

Hyde, Aurore. 2019. “La justice prédictive: Enjeux et perspectives”. HAL open science. Accessed July 1, 2023. https://hal.science/hal-02149092/document.

Katz, Daniel M., Michael J. Bommarito II, Josh Blackman. 2014. “Predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States: A general approach”. Cornell University. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1407.6333.pdf.

Kay, Jonathan. 2017. “How do you regulate a self-improving algorithm?” The Atlantic. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/10/algorithms-future-of-health-care/543825.

Keown, Robert. 1980. “Mathematical models for legal prediction”. Computer Law Journal 2 (1). Accessed June 30, 2023. https://repository.law.uic.edu/jitpl/vol2/iss1/29.

Khalil, Ahmed. 2017. “Judicial announcement in the electronic way, its cases and sometimes illogicality”. The twenty-fifth international conference of the College of Law. Abu Dhabi. (In Arabic)

Kischel, Uwe, Andrew Hammel, eds. 2019. “The Context of Common Law”. Comparative Law, 227–358. Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791355.003.0005.

Leach, Philip, Costas Paraskeva, Gordana Uzelac. 2010. “Human rights fact-finding. The European Court of Human Rights at a crossroads”. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 28 (1): 41–77. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934411002800103

Magrish, James L. 1961. “The Common Law tradition: Deciding appeals by Karl N. Llewellyn”. Indiana Law Journal 36 (4). Accessed June 30, 2023. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol36/iss4/9.

Manyika, James, Michael Chui. 2013. “Digital era brings hyperscale challenges”. The Financial Times. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://www.ft.com/content/f30051b2-1e36-11e4-bb68-00144feabdc0.

Polisano, Kevin. 2018. Cours de Statistiques niveau L1-L2. Accessed July 1, 2023. https://hal.science/cel-01787365/file/Cours_Statistiques_Polisano.pdf.

Pound, Roscoe. 1908. “Mechanical jurisprudence”. Columbia Law Review 8 (8): 605–623. Accessed June 30, 2023. http://www.minnesotalegalhistoryproject.org/assets/Pound-Mech.J.(1908)-MM.pdf.

Razmetaeva, Yulia, Sergiy Razmetaev. 2021. “Justice in the digital age: Technological solutions, hidden threats and enticing opportunities”. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 2 (10): 104–117. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-4.2-a000061

Rouvière, Frédéric. 2018. “Le raisonnement par algorithmes: le fantasme du juge-robot”. HAL open science. Accessed July 1, 2023. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02250220.

Segal, Jeffrey. 1984. “Predicting Supreme Court cases probabilistically: The search and seizure cases, 1962–1981”. American Political Science Review 78 (4): 891–900. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1955796.

Villasenor, John, Virginia Foggo. 2019. “Algorithms and sentencing: What does due process require?” Brookings. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/algorithms-and-sentencing-whatdoes-due-process-require.

Weber, Stephanie. 2018. “How artificial intelligence is transforming the criminal justice system”. /thoughtworks. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://www.thoughtworks.com/insights/blog/how-artificial-intelligence-transforming-criminal-justice-system.

Загрузки

Опубликован

14.12.2023

Как цитировать

Abdulkareem, F. A. A. (2023). Development of legal-tech prospects in the Federal Republic of Iraq: The predictive justice in Anglo-Saxon and Latin perspectives. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право, 14(4), 1045–1061. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.413

Выпуск

Раздел

Зарубежное и международное право