Inheritance of social media accounts in Germany and Sweden

Authors

  • Ekaterina A. Abrosimova Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, MGIMO-University, 76, pr. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2801-8686
  • Ellina V. Vlasenko Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, MGIMO-University, 76, pr. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1804-527X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.210

Abstract

The question how the legal framework may cover Internet relations is not new and has been discussed at least since the end of the 20th century. But over the past decade and a half, the electronic environment has been developing, while classification and regulation of new institutions raise some complexities. One of them is social media accounts. Their legal status as objects of rights is unclear since such accounts are a set of rights and relationships laying at the intersection of different institutions and law branches such as contractual relationships, copyright for posts and photos, personal correspondence, and privacy. At the same time, commercialization of social media accounts is gaining momentum, which turns them into an “electronic enterprise”. The purpose of this research is to identify order of inheritance of accounts in Sweden and Germany. These legal systems are close to the Russian one, the results obtained may be used to improve Russian legislation. Moreover, the authors know the relevant foreign languages, which allows them to analyze the legislation in detail. The object of analysis is the relationships that arise in connection with the need to determine the legal fate of a user’s account after his death. The scope of inheritance relations is chosen because this issue has become increasingly common in law enforcement practice. Besides, the Federal Supreme court of Germany recently issued a controversial decision which might affect German law, other European legal systems, or the relevant elements of the content of user agreements. The authors use the comparative method, methods of analysis, synthesis, deduction, and induction. The authors’ conclusion is the issue is unsettled. The solution proposed by the German Federal Supreme court is imperfect. In the article there are also some comments on improving Russian regulation, taking into account the experience of the legal systems studied.

Keywords:

digital property, digital accounts qualification, digital accounts inheritance, inheritance digitalization, memory clause

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Лазаренкова, Ольга Г. 2019. «К вопросу о цифровых правах, а также цифровой учетной записи в наследственных правоотношениях». Наследственное право 3: 24–27.

Лоренц, Дмитрий В. 2020. «Наследственный договор: подход континентального права». Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики 2: 105–129.

Панарина, Мария М. 2018. «Наследование аккаунта в социальных сетях и вопросы цифрового наследования: правовое исследование». Наследственное право 3: 27–28.

Петров, Евгений Ю. 2018. «Комментарий к статье 1112». Наследственное право: постатейный комментарий к статьям 1110–1185, 1224 Гражданского кодекса РФ. Отв. ред. Евгений Ю. Петров, 58–80. М.: М-Логос.

Печеный, Олег П. 2018. «Влияние интернет-среды на сделки о распоряжении имуществом на случай смерти физического лица». Право в сфере интернета: сб. ст. Под ред. Марины А. Рожковой, 356–362. М.: Статут.

Djeffal, Kristian, Christian Ernst, Daniel Mattig, Peter Schaar, Theresa Witt. 2017. “Digitalisierung und Recht”. Schriften der Bucerius Law School 2/31: 1–124. Hamburg: Bucerius Law School Press. Дата обращения 20 октября, 2020. http://www.gbv.de/dms/buls/899017584.pdf.

Hedin, Lotta. 2018. “Så ser du över ditt digitala arv”. Testfakta. Дата обращения 15 ноября, 2021. https://www.testfakta.se/sv/article/sa-ser-du-over-ditt-digitala-arv.

Larenz, Karl. 1989. Allgemeiner Teil des deutschen Bürgerlichen Rechts. 7 Aufl., neubearbeitete. München: C. H. Beck.

Leffler, Tim. 2020. “Ditt digitala arv”. Voister. Дата обращения 15 ноября, 2021. https://www.voister.se/artikel/2020/02/ditt-digitala-arv.

Ludyga, Hannes. 2018. “Digitales Update für das Erbrecht im BGB?” Zeitschrift für Erbrecht und Vermögensnachfolge 1: 1–6.

Lundin, Emma. 2016. Den digitala arvsrätten — när avlidna personer lever vidare. Stockholm: Stockholms universitetet. Дата обращения 15 ноября, 2021. http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:910460/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

Müller, Welf. 1995. Wohin entwickelt sich der bilanzrechtliche Eigenkapitalbegriff? Rechenschaftslegung im Wandel. München: C. H. Beck.

Rydgren, Denis. 2020. “Vem ärver din digitala närvaro när du dör?”. Pressmeddelande 200212. Lavendla. Дата обращения 15 ноября, 2021. https://mb.cision.com/Main/760/3033407/1192479.pdf.

Seifert, Alexander I. 2019. “The digital heritage in the conflict of personal rights, telecommunications secrecy and data protection in Germany”. European Review of Private Law 27 (5): 1169–1179.

Zimmermann, Reinhard. 2016. “The intestate succession rights of the deceased’s spouse in historical and comparative perspective”. Rabels Zeitschrift Fur Auslandisches Und Internationales Privatrecht 80 (1): 39–92.

References

Djeffal, Kristian, Christian Ernst, Daniel Mattig, Peter Schaar, Theresa Witt. 2017. “Digitalisierung und Recht”. Schriften der Bucerius Law School 2/31: 1–124. Hamburg: Bucerius Law School Press. Accessed October 20, 2020. http://www.gbv.de/dms/buls/899017584.pdf.

Hedin, Lotta. 2018. “Så ser du över ditt digitala arv”. Testfakta. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://www.testfakta.se/sv/article/sa-ser-du-over-ditt-digitala-arv.

Larenz, Karl. 1989. Allgemeiner Teil des deutschen Bürgerlichen Rechts. 7 Aufl., neubearbeitete. München: C. H. Beck.

Lazarenkova, Ol’ga G. 2019. “On digital rights and the digital account in inheritance relationships”. Nasledstvennoe pravo 3: 24–27. (In Russian)

Leffler, Tim. 2020. “Ditt digitala arv”. Voister. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://www.voister.se/artikel/2020/02/ditt-digitala-arv.

Ludyga, Hannes. 2018. “Digitales Update für das Erbrecht im BGB?” Zeitschrift für Erbrecht und Vermögensnachfolge 1: 1–6.

Lundin, Emma. 2016. Den digitala arvsrätten — när avlidna personer lever vidare. Stockholm: Stockholms universitetet. Accessed November 15, 2021. http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:910460/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

Müller, Welf. 1995. Wohin entwickelt sich der bilanzrechtliche Eigenkapitalbegriff? Rechenschaftslegung im Wandel. München: C. H. Beck.

Panarina, Mariia M. 2018. “Inheritance of an account in social networks and digital inheritance issues: A legal research”. Nasledstvennoe pravo 3: 27–28. (In Russian)

Pechenyi, Oleg P. 2018. “Impact of internet-environment of transactions about property disposal in case of death of physical person”. Pravo v sfere Interneta: sbornik statei. Ed. by Marina A. Rozhkova, 356–362. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Petrov, Evgenii Iu. 2018. “Commentary to Article 1112”. Nasledstvennoe pravo: postateinyi kommentarii k stat’iam 1110–1185, 1224 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Ed. by Evgenii Iu. Petrov, 58–80. Moscow, M-Logos Publ. (In Russian)

Rydgren, Denis. 2020. “Vem ärver din digitala närvaro när du dör?”. Pressmeddelande 200212. Lavendla. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://mb.cision.com/Main/760/3033407/1192479.pdf.

Seifert, Alexander I. 2019. “The digital heritage in the conflict of personal rights, telecommunications secrecy and data protection in Germany”. European Review of Private Law 27 (5): 1169–1179.

Zimmermann, Reinhard. 2016. “The intestate succession rights of the deceased’s spouse in historical and comparative perspective”. Rabels Zeitschrift Fur Auslandisches Und Internationales Privatrecht 80 (1): 39–92.

Published

2022-07-28

How to Cite

Abrosimova, E. A., & Vlasenko, E. V. (2022). Inheritance of social media accounts in Germany and Sweden. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 13(2), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.210

Issue

Section

Foreign and International Law

Most read articles by the same author(s)