Political justice: Essence, genesis, and evolution

Authors

  • Оleksandr P. Yevsieiev National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, 3, Bolshoy Trekhsvyatitelskiy per., Moscow, 109028, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.117

Abstract

The article deals with the phenomenon of the dependence of the judicial branch from the political authorities, known as “political justice”. Various forms of manifestation of this phenomenon in numerous types of legal proceedings (international, constitutional and criminal) are investigated. In addition to the politicization of justice, the opposite phenomenon is also observed — the judicialization of politics, which means more active listening by politicians to the position of the judiciary and more frequent appeals by politicians to legal means in order to achieve political goals. Indicators of judicial statistics are analyzed, indicative of the presence of an accusatory bias as a sign of politicization of the judiciary sui generis. Referring to specific trials (in particular, on former heads of state, political opponents of the ruling elite and Islamic extremists), different kinds of procedural tricks are used, which the judges resort to in resolving this category of cases. Positive and negative aspects of the interaction of courts with the legislative and executive branches of state power are highlighted. Psychological phenomena in the behavior and consciousness of judges that accompany “political justice”, in particular the so-called “strategic flight phenomenon”, can be analyzed where judges refrain from making decisions on high-profile cases, artificially delaying their consideration. The prevalence of a situation in which two parallel systems coexist peacefully in the structure of the judiciary is ascertained: ordinary courts and various kinds of emergency tribunals and other structures involved in political repressions. Reference is made to the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, in which the latter stated the political motivation of a number of criminal cases previously resolved by the national courts. In particular, a characteristic trick that lawyers resort to under conditions of political justice is to give retroactive force to the law.

Keywords:

“political justice”, constitutional justice, political repression, accusatory bias, prosecution of heads of state, international criminal justice

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Арендт, Ханна. 2008. Банальность зла. М.: Знание.

Блохин, Павел. 2013. «Реформа судебной власти в Венгрии и европейские стандарты справедливого правосудия». Сравнительное конституционное обозрение 5: 67–84.

Григорьев, Иван С. 2012. «Политология судов: предмет и исследовательская программа». Политическая наука 3: 258–275.

Григорьев, Иван С. 2013. «Причины провала первого проекта конституционного правосудия в постсоветской России». Полития 2: 39–49.

Григорьев, Иван С. 2017a. «Внутрисудебные институты как инструмент адаптации конституционного суда в процессе консолидации политического режима (на примере КС РФ)». Дис. … канд. полит. наук. НИУ «Высшая школа экономики».

Григорьев, Иван С. 2017b. «Стратегический подход к судебной политике и соотношение внешних и внутрисудебных институтов в организации судебной власти». Полития 1: 159–174.

Дель Понте, Карла. 2008. Охота: я и военные преступники. М.: Эксмо.

Дершовиц, Алан. 2005. Почему терроризм действует. М.: РОССПЭН.

Евсеев, Александр П. 2013. Психология конституционного судопроизводства. Харьков: Юрайт.

Егоров, Сергей А. 1989. Политическая юриспруденция в США. М.: Наука.

Загретдинов, Василий. 2015. «Конституционное орудие политической борьбы». Сравнительное конституционное обозрение 5: 104–119.

Краковский, Константин П. 2012. Политическая юстиция в России во второй половине XIX — начале XX веков. М.: Юрист.

Кудрявцев, Владимир Н., Алексей И. Трусов. 2000. Политическая юстиция в СССР. М.: Наука.

Ларин, Александр М. 2000. Государственные преступления. Россия. XIX век. Тула: Автограф.

Мадьяр, Балинт. 2016. Анатомия посткоммунистического мафиозного государства: на примере Венгрии. М.: Новое литературное обозрение.

Марченко, Михаил Н. 1995. «Судебная власть в политической системе Германии 30–40-х годов». Вестник МГУ. Серия 11. Право 1: 3–11.

Меллер, Хорст. 2010. Веймарская республика: опыт одной незавершенной демократии. М.:РОССПЭН.

«Можно ли отступать от Конституции во имя ее защиты? Обзор заключения Венецианской комиссии о чрезвычайном положении в Турции (декабрь 2016 г.)» 2017. Сравнительное конституционное обозрение 2: 133–138.

Морщакова, Тамара Г. 1970. «Реакционное уголовное право — составная часть чрезвычайного законодательства». Чрезвычайное законодательство ФРГ, под ред. Виктора М. Чхиквадзе, 192–207. М.: Юридическая литература.

Панеях, Элла. 2016. «Суды и правоохранительные органы: репрессивное правоприменение». Политическое развитие России. 2014–2016: институты и практики авторитарной консолидации, под ред. Кирилла Рогова, 154–163. М.: Либеральная миссия.

Пашин, Сергей А. 2011. Становление правосудия. М.: Р. Валент.

Попова, Мария. 2012. «Политизированное правосудие в новых демократиях: политическая борьба и судебная независимость в России и Украине». Как судьи принимают решения: эмпирические исследования права, под ред. Вадима В. Волкова, 199–223. М.: Статут.

Соломон, Питер. 2008. Советская юстиция при Сталине. М.: РОССПЭН.

Соломон-мл., Питер. 2008. «Суды и судьи при авторитарных режимах». Сравнительное конституционное обозрение 3: 156–174.

Троицкий, Николай А. 2000. Адвокатура в России и политические процессы 1866–1904 гг. Тула: Автограф.

Хованская, Анна. 2010. «Политическая юриспруденция: постклассический анализ судебных решений и идея легитимности». Сравнительное конституционное обозрение 1: 5–19.

Bachmann, Klaus, Thomas Sparrow-Botero, Peter Lambertz. 2013. When Justice Meets Politics. Frankfurt a/M.: Peter Lang Edition.

Epstein, Lee, Eric Posner. 2016. “Supreme Court Justices’ Loyalty to the President”. The Journal of Legal Studies 45 (June): 401–436.

Helmke, Gretchen. 2005. Courts under Constraints. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kirchheimer, Otto. 1961. Political Justice. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.

Koch, Hannsjoachim W. 1989. In the Name of the Volk. Political Justice in Hitler’s Germany. New York: Barnes & Noble.

Laughland, John. 2008. A History of Political Trials. London: Peter Lang Oxford.

Meierhenrich, Jens, Devin O. Pendas. 2016. “The Justice of My Course Is Clear, but There’s Politics to Fear:Political Trials in Theory and History”. Political Trials in Theory and History, eds J. Meierhenrich and D. Pendas, 1–64. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Muller, Ingo. 1991. Hitler’s Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Popova, Maria. 2012. Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Posner, Eric. 2005. “Political Trials in Domestic and International Law”. Duke Law Journal 55 (75): 75–152.

References

Arendt, Hanna 2008. Banality of evil. Moscow, Znanie Publ. (In Russian)

Bachmann, Klaus, Thomas Sparrow-Botero, Peter Lambertz. 2013. When Justice Meets Politics. Frankfurt a/M., Peter Lang Edition.

Blokhin, Pavel. 2013. “The reform of judiciary in Hungary and the European standarts of the fair trial”. Sravnitel’noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie 5: 67–84. (In Russian)

Grigoriev, Ivan S. 2012. “The politology of courts: the subject and research programme”. Politicheskaya nauka 3: 258–275. (In Russian)

Grigoriev, Ivan S. 2013. “The reasons of the fail of the first project of the constitutional justice in post-Soviet Russia”. Politiya 2: 39–49. (In Russian)

Grigoriev, Ivan S. 2017b. “A strategic approach to judicial policy and the ratio of external and intra-judicial institutions in the organization of the judiciary”. Politiya 1: 159–174. (In Russian)

Grigoriev, Ivan S. 2017a. “Internal judicial institutions as a tool for the adaptation of a constitutional court in the process of consolidating the political regime (on example of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation).” PhD Diss. in Politics, NIU “Vysshaia shkola ekonomiki”. (In Russian)

Del Ponte, Karla. 2008. Hunting: me and military criminals. Moscow, Eksmo Publ. (In Russian)

Dershovic, Alan. 2005. Why terrorism works. Moscow, Rosspen Publ. (In Russian)

Egorov, Sergei A. 1989. The political jurisprudence in the USA. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Epstein, Lee, Eric Posner. 2016. “Supreme Court Justices’ Loyalty to the President”. The Journal of Legal Studies 45 (June): 401–436.

Helmke, Gretchen. 2005. Courts under Constraints. New York, Cambridge University Press.

“Is it possible to break the constitution for its defense? Review of the Venice commission opinion on the state of emergency in Turkey (December 2016)” 2017. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie 2: 133–138. (In Russian)

Khovanskaia, Anna. 2010. “Political jurisprudence: post-classical analysis of judgments and the idea of legitimacy”. Sravnitelnoe konstitucionnoe obozrenie 1: 5–19. (In Russian)

Kirchheimer, Otto. 1961. Political Justice. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Koch, Hannsjoachim W. 1989. In the Name of the Volk. Political Justice in Hitler’s Germany. New York, Barnes & Noble.

Krakovskii, Konstantin P. 2012. Political justice in Russia in the second half of XIX — at the beginning of the XX century. Moscow, Iurist Publ. (In Russian)

Kudriavtsev, Vladimir N., Aleksei I. Trusov. 2000. The political justice in the USSR. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Larin, Aleksandr M. 2000. The state crimes. Russia. XIX century. Tula, Avtograf Publ. (In Russian)

Laughland, John. 2008. A History of Political Trials. London, Peter Lang Oxford.

Mad’iar, Balint. 2016. Anatomy of the post-communist mafia state: case of Hungary. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ. (In Russian)

Marchenko, Mikhail N. 1995. “Judiciary in the political system of Germany in 30–40s years”. Vestnik MGU. Seriia 11. Pravo 1: 3–11. (In Russian)

Meierhenrich, Jens, Devin O. Pendas. 2016. “The Justice of My Course Is Clear, but There’s Politics to Fear: Political Trials in Theory and History”. Political Trials in Theory and History, eds J. Meierhenrich and D. Pendas, 1–64. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Meller, Horst. 2010. Weimar republic: the experience of single unfinished democracy. Moscow, Rosspen Publ.(In Russian)

Morshchakova, Tamara G. 1970. “Reactionary criminal law as the part of the extraordinary legislation of the FRG”. Chrezvychainoe zakonodatel’stvo FRG, ed. Viktor M. Chkhikvadze, 192–207. Moscow, Iuridicheskaia literaturа Publ. (In Russian)

Muller, Ingo. 1991. Hitler’s Justice. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Paneiakh, Ella. 2016. “The courts and law-enforcement organs: repressive law-enforcement”. Politicheskoe razvitie Rossii. 2014–2016: instituty i praktiki avtoritarnoi konsolidatsii, ed. Kirill Rogov, 154–163. Moscow, Liberal’naia missiia Publ. (In Russian)

Pashin, Sergei A. 2011. Making justice. Moscow, R. Valent Publ. (In Russian)

Popova, Maria. 2012. Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Popova, Maria. 2012. “Politicized justice in new democracies: politics and judicial independence in Russia and Ukraine”. Kak sud’i prinimaiut resheniia: empiricheskie issledovaniia prava, ed. Vadim V. Volkov, 199–223. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Posner, Eric. 2005. “Political Trials in Domestic and International Law”. Duke Law Journal 55 (75): 75–152.

Solomon, Piter. 2008. The soviet justice under Stalin. Moscow, Rosspen Publ. (In Russian)

Solomon-ml., Piter. 2008. “The courts and judges under the authoritarian regimes”. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie 3: 156–174. (In Russian)

Troitskii, Nikolai A. 2000. The bar in Russia and political trials 1864–1904. Tula, Avtograf Publ. (In Russian)

Yevsieiev, Oleksandr P. 2013. The psychology of constitutional justice. Khar’kov, Iurait Publ. (In Russian)

Zagretdinov, Vasilii. 2015. “The constitutional tool of political fighting”. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie 5: 104–119. (In Russian)

Published

2020-03-31

How to Cite

Yevsieiev О. P. (2020). Political justice: Essence, genesis, and evolution. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 11(1), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.117

Issue

Section

Legal Life: Scientific-Practical Conclusions, Comments and Reviews