The Right of Private Defence under the Indian Penal Code, 1860

Authors

  • Елена Николаевна Трикоз Moscow State Institute of International Relations MGIMO University, 76, Vernadskogo av., Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 6, Miklukho-Maklaya st., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.109

Abstract

The complex institute of Private Defence (self-defence) in Indian criminal law was codified in the colonial period. This institute was included in Chapter IV “General Exceptions” of the Indian Penal Code of 1860, which continues to operate in the modern period with some changes and the judicial interpretation. According to the classification in the Indian and all common law countries doctrine, the self-defense institute belongs to the category of justifications, which excluding unlawfulness and, accordingly, the criminal nature of the conduct. The IPC Right of Private Defence is regulated in three blocks of legal norms (section 96 to 106) relating to the defence of person and property. Among them definitions and general provisions on private protection, the conditions for legitimacy and the self-defence excess (timeliness and proportionality), restriction of this right, situations in which the right of private defence of the body extends even to causing death or other harm. In the Indian Penal Code, unlike in most countries, there is an exception to the rule of proportionality: harm can be caused not only to the attacker but also to third parties who are not related to this dangerous encroachment. Another condition for legality has become cases where the defense is directed against officials or other authorized persons, even if their actions against the defender did not have a basis specified in the law. Most of the explanatory norms of the right of private defence are contained in the practice of the federal supreme and highest state courts. A feature of the institute is its social orientation and the active position of the court in the matter of establishing such exceptional circumstances as self-defence in each specific case.

Keywords:

common law system, Hindu law, case law, criminal code, criminal liability, general exceptions, justifications, excuses, self-defence, a right of private defence, the lawfulness of defenсe

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Голованова, Наталья, А. 2017. Уголовное право Англии. М.: Юрайт.

Грюнхут, Макс. 1961. «Английское уголовное право». Современное зарубежное уголовное право. Чили, Англия, Греция, Австрия. Под ред. Андрея А. Пионтковского, 177–352. М.: Иностранная литература.

Есаков, Геннадий А., Крылова, Наталья Е., Серебренникова, Анна В. 2011. Уголовное право зарубежных стран. М.: Проспект.

Кенни, Кортни С. 1949. Основы уголовного права. Пер. с англ. под ред. Б. С. Никифорова. М.: Иностранная литература.

Крашенинникова, Нина А., Трикоз, Елена Н. 2017. «Уголовный кодекс Индии 1860 года: история создания и характерные черты». Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение 4: 183–206.

Крашенинникова, Нина А., Трикоз, Елена Н. 2018. «Цели и система наказаний в Уголовном кодексе Индии 1860 г.». Вестник Московского университета. Серия 11. Право 1: 23–43.

Музлов, Александр В. 2008. «Возникновение и развитие института необходимой обороны». Государство и право 10: 101–105.

Никифоров, Борис С. 1958. Уголовное законодательство Республики Индии: Очерк. М.: Госюриздат.

Трикоз, Елена Н. 2002. Уголовный кодекс Австралии 1995 г. СПб.: Юридический центр «Пресс».

Хасан, Мохаммад Джеаул. 2005. Преступления против жизни и здоровья по уголовному праву Индии и Бангладеш. Автореф. дис. … канд. юрид. наук. Российский университет дружбы народов.

Berman, Mitchell. 2003. “Justification and Excuse, Law and Morality”. Duke Law Journal 53: 1–77.

Blackstone, William. 2018. “Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England”. The Avalon Project at Yale Law School. Accessed May 1, 2018. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/blackstone_bk4ch2.asp.

Cross, Rupert. 1978. “The Making of English Criminal Law: Macaulay”. Criminal Law Review 5: 519–528.

Lelan, Lester. 1878. “Law and the Study of Law”. The Canadian Monthly and National Review 13(1): 199.

Rai, Mridu. 2004. Hindu Rulers, Muslim Subjects: Islam, Rights, and the History of Kashmir. Ranikhet: Published by Permanent Black.

Rankin, George C. 1946. Background to Indian Law. Cambridge: University Press.

Ratanlal R., Dhirajlal K. Th. 1999. The Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860). Agra; New Delhi.

Stephen, James Fitzjames. 1872. “Codification in India and England”. The Fortnightly Review 18: 644–672.

Yeo, S. 1985. “The Application of Common Law Defences to the Penal Code in Singapore and Malaysia.” The Common Law in Singapore and Malaysia. Singapore: Butterworths.

References

Berman, Mitchell. 2003. “Justification and Excuse, Law and Morality”. Duke Law Journal 53: 1–77.

Blackstone, William. 2018. “Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England”. The Avalon Project at Yale Law School. Accessed May 1, 2018. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/blackstone_bk4ch2.asp.

Cross, Rupert. 1978. “The Making of English Criminal Law: Macaulay”. Criminal Law Review 5: 519–528.

Golovanova, Nataliya, A. 2017. “Ugolovnoye pravo Anglii” [“Criminal Law of England”]. Moscow: Yurayt Publ. (In Russian)

Gryunkhut, Maks. 1961. “Angliyskoye ugolovnoye pravo” [“English criminal law”]. Sovremennoye zarubezhnoye ugolovnoye pravo. Chili, Angliya, Gretsiya, Avstriya [Modern foreign criminal law. Chile, England, Greece, Austria], 177–352. Moscow: Foreign Literature Publ. (In Russian)

Kenni, Kortni S. 1949. Osnovy ugolovnogo prava [Outlines of Criminal Law]. Moscow: Foreign Literature Publ. (In Russian)

Khasan, Mokhammad Dzheaul. 2005. Prestupleniya protiv zhizni i zdorov'ya po ugolovnomu pravu Indii i Bangladesh [Crimes against Life and Health in the Criminal Law of India and Bangladesh]. Self-abstract of a PhD dissertation. Peoples’ Friendship Russian University. (In Russian)

Krasheninnikova, Nina A., Trikoz, Elena N. 2017. “Ugolovnyy kodeks Indii 1860 goda: istoriya sozdaniya i kharakternyye cherty” [“The Indian Penal Code, 1860: History and Characteristics”]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedeniye 4: 183–206. (In Russian)

Krasheninnikova, Nina A., Trikoz, Elena N. 2018. “Tseli i sistema nakazaniy v Ugolovnom kodekse Indii 1860 g.” [“Goals and System of Punishments in the Indian Penal Code, 1860”]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11. Pravo 1: 23–43. (In Russian)

Lelan, Lester. 1878. “Law and the Study of Law”. The Canadian Monthly and National Review 13(1): 199.

Muzlov, Aleksandr V. 2008. “Vozniknoveniye i razvitiye instituta neobkhodimoy oborony” [“The emergence and development of the institution of necessary defence”]. Gosudarstvo i pravo [The State and the Law] 10: 101–105. (In Russian)

Nikiforov, Boris S. 1958. Ugolovnoye zakonodatel'stvo Respubliki Indii: Ocherk [Criminal legislation of the Republic of India: Essay]. Moscow: The state law literature publ. (In Russian)

Rai, Mridu. 2004. Hindu Rulers, Muslim Subjects: Islam, Rights, and the History of Kashmir. Ranikhet: Published by Permanent Black.

Rankin, George C. 1946. Background to Indian Law. Cambridge: University Press.

Ratanlal R., Dhirajlal K. Th. 1999. The Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860). Agra; New Delhi.

Stephen, James Fitzjames. 1872. “Codification in India and England”. The Fortnightly Review 18: 644–672.

Trikoz, Elena N. 2002. Ugolovnyy kodeks Avstralii 1995 [The Criminal Code of Australia, 1995]. St. Petersburg: Yuridichesky Center Press. (In Russian)

Yeo, S. 1985. “The Application of Common Law Defences to the Penal Code in Singapore and Malaysia”. The Common Law in Singapore and Malaysia. Singapore: Butterworths.

Yesakov, Gennadiy A., Krylova, Nataliya Y.; Serebrennikova, Anna V. 2011. Ugolovnoye pravo zarubezhnykh stran [“Criminal Law of Foreign Countries”]. Moscow: Prospekt Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2019-01-31

How to Cite

Трикоз, Е. Н. (2019). The Right of Private Defence under the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 10(1), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.109

Issue

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research