Party will autonomy in public-private partnership: Procedural aspects

Authors

  • Inna A. Orlova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1052-7052

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.204

Abstract

The article examines the problems of the realization of the autonomy of parties in the process of selecting ways to resolve disputes from public-private partnerships. A public-private partnership is considered as a type of contractual relationship based on the autonomy of will of the parties (the autonomy of the parties). The autonomy of the parties is one of the principles of private relations and is implemented in the material and procedural aspects. The opinion is expressed that the autonomy of the parties was formed as a principle in not only private, but also civil procedural and transnational procedural law. In procedural relations, it is expressed in the freedom to choose the method of resolving a dispute. The procedural autonomy of the parties is limited by imperative norms of national legislation. A comparison is made of methods for resolving disputes from public-private partnerships recommended by international intergovernmental universal and regional organizations and enshrined in domestic and foreign legislation. The protection mechanisms offered by international organizations are based on freedom of choice when selecting a method for dispute resolution by the parties, however, the state may limit the autonomy of the parties in the freedom of choice of procedures. An assessment is made of the prospects for the use of alternative procedures as an effective means of resolving disputes between the state and business structures. There is considerable potential for the extrajudicial procedures in the settlement of public-private partnership disputes. It is noted that in the legislation of the states that allow a foreign natural or legal person as a public partner, international commercial arbitration is usually introduced into the dispute resolution system. One of the trends in the development of the dispute resolution mechanism was the creation of specialized arbitrations for the settlement of disputes in the field of public-private partnerships.

Keywords:

public-private partnership, party will autonomy, dispute resolution, arbitration, procedural forms, mediation, mini-trail, adaptation of contracts

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Абросимова, Екатерина А. 2016. «Внедоговорные обязательства в МЧП и косвенная автономия воли». Право и экономика 6: 55–62.

Канашевский, Владимир А. 2009. Международное частное право: учебник. М.: Международные отношения.

Нешатаева, Татьяна А. 2004. Международное частное право и международный гражданский процесс. М.: Городец.

Gutmann, Thomas. 2013. Theories of Contract and the Concept of Autonomy. Münster: Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster. Дата обращения 28 октября, 2018. https://www.uni-muenster.de/imperia/md/content/kfg-normenbegruendung/intern/publikationen/gutmann/55_gutmann_-_contract_and_autonomy.pdf.

Howells, Geraint, Andre Janssen, Reiner Schulze eds. 2005. Information Rights and Obligations: A Challenge for Party Autonomy and Transactional Fairness. Aldershot, Hants, England; Burlington VT: Ashgate Publishing.

Nygh, Peter. 1999. Autonomy in International Contracts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pryles, Michael. 2007. “Limits to Party Autonomy in Arbitral Procedure”. Journal of International Arbitration 24(3): 327–339.

Sanni, Gabriel A. and John. O. Adebiyi. 2017. “Dispute Resolution in Public-Private Partnerships (PPPS)Contracts in Nigeria”. Nigerian Research Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences 2(1): 259–269.

Zen, Fauziah and Michael Regan eds. 2014. Asean Public Private Partnership Guidelines. Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia. Дата обращения 12 июля, 2018. https://asean.org/storage/2016/09/Public-Private-Partnership-in-South-East-Asia.pdf.

References

Abrosimova, Ekaterina. A. 2016. “Non-contractual obligations in international private law and indirect autonomy of the will”. Pravo i ekonomika 6: 55–62. (In Russian)

Gutmann, Thomas. 2013. Theories of Contract and the Concept of Autonomy. Münster: Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster. Accessed October 28, 2018. https://www.uni-muenster.de/imperia/md/content/kfg-normenbegruendung/intern/publikationen/gutmann/55_gutmann_-_contract_and_autonomy.pdf.

Howells, Geraint, Andre Janssen, Reiner Schulze eds. 2005. Information Rights and Obligations: A Challenge for Party Autonomy and Transactional Fairness. Aldershot, Hants, England; Burlington VT: Ashgate Publishing.

Kanashevskii, Vladimir A. 2009. International Private Law: textbook. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia Publ. (In Russian)

Neshataeva, Tat’iana A. 2004. International Private Law and International Civil Process. Moscow, Gorodets Publ. (In Russian)

Nygh, Peter. 1999. Autonomy in International Contracts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pryles, Michael. 2007. “Limits to Party Autonomy in Arbitral Procedure”. Journal of International Arbitration 24(3): 327–339.

Sanni, Gabriel A. and John. O. Adebiyi. 2017. “Dispute Resolution in Public-Private Partnerships (PPPS)Contracts in Nigeria”. Nigerian Research Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences 2(1): 259–269.

Zen, Fauziah and Michael Regan eds. 2014. Asean Public Private Partnership Guidelines. Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia. Accessed July 12, 2018. https://asean.org/storage/2016/09/Public-Private-Partnership-in-South-East-Asia.pdf.

Published

2020-06-29

How to Cite

Orlova, I. A. (2020). Party will autonomy in public-private partnership: Procedural aspects. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 11(2), 306–318. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.204

Issue

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research