Открытый характер земельных регистров: сравнительно-правовой анализ в европейском контексте

Аркадиуш Вударский

doi:10.21638/11701/spbu14.2016.406

Authors

Аркадиуш Вударский Große Scharrnstrasse, 59, Frankfurt (Oder), 15230, Germany; University of Zielona Góra, 50, ul. Podgorna, Zielona Góra, 65-264, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2016.406

Abstract

This paper focuses on the problem of the availability of land register content and on associated axiological dilemmas, in particular those resulting from conflicts with the right to privacy. The paper offers a comparative study set in the European context. It outlines the existing regulations concerning this topic as well as the most recent changes and directions of development, and observes that the principle of open public access to land registers is well-known in Europe, although it is regulated and applied in a variety of ways. In this context, the unlimited nature of public access to land registers in Poland receives a critical note. Risks related to electronic land registers and their online accessibility are also presented. The main basis of comparative reference is the German system of land registers, which seems to balance all relevant conflicting values. In the search for the best concept of public access to land registers, it is argued that only what is essential for the safety of economic transactions should be open to the public. To achieve this, the content of land registers should be verified and then two levels of access to such data should be introduced. It is also asserted that the security of legal transactions is based not on the quantity, but rather on the quality and reliability of information, and that the pursuit of information availability cannot completely ignore the information autonomy of individuals or Deprive them of their right to privacy. Finally, it is suggested that although improved functioning of land registers in member states could serve as an important instrument to improve the competitiveness of the European Union, a common European land register seems unlikely in the near future, despite dynamic growth and continued development of land register systems. Refs 36.

Keywords:

land registers, economic and legal transactions, open public access, Polish context, German context, European context

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References

Kuropatwiński J. Land Registers. Vol. 1. Commentary on Art. 1–10 of the Land Register and Mortgage Act. Bydgoszcz, Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością w Bydgoszcz, 2013.

Cierpiał R. Polish Real Property Law, Civil Law Aspects. Vienna, Graz, BWV Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2006.

Stawecki T. Publicity as a Legal Value. Studia Iuridica, 2004, vol. XLIII.

Wudarski A. Das formelle Publizitätsprinzip [Formal principle of publicity]. Ius est ars boni et aequi— Festschrift für Stanisława Kalus [Ius est ars boni et aequi — Jubilee collection for Stanislawa Kalus]. Eds M. Habdas, A. Wudarski. Frankfurt/M., Berlin, Bern, Brüssel, New York, Oxford, Wien, Peter Lang Verlag, 2010.

Kisilowska H., ed. Real Property. Legal Issues. Warszawa, LexisNexis Polska, 2007.

Rudnicki S. The Land Register and Mortgage Act. Regulations on Land Register Proceedings. Commentary. Warszawa, LexisNexis Polska, 2010. 284 p.

Borkowski P., Trześniewski-Kwiecień J. Entries in Land Registers. Warszawa, Wolters Kluwer S. A., 2008.

Gniewek E. Private Law System, vol. 4. Property Law. Ed. by E. Gniewek. Warszawa, C. H. Beck, 2007.

Szostek D. Access to the Land Register for a Notary — Amendment of the Land Register and Mortgage Act. Rejent. [The notary], 2013, no. 10.

Siciński P. Disclosing the Content of the Land Register — Tradition and Perspectives. Part II. Nieruchomości [Real estate], 2001, no. 5.

Westermann H. P., Gursky K. H., Eickmann D. Sachenrecht [Law of ownership]. Berlin, Osnabrück, Tübingen, C. F. Müller Publ., 2011.

Simitis S. Die informationelle Selbstbestimmung- Grundbedingung einer verfassungskonformen Informationsordnung [The informational self-determination fundamental condition of a constitutional order of information]. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift [New Legal Weekly Journal], 1984, no. 18.

Böttcher R. M. Grundbuchordnung, Kommentar [Land Register, Comment]. Köln, München, Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2009, § 12, no. 2.

Wilsch H. Beck’scher Online-Kommentar zur Grundbuchordnung [Beck-Online Comment to Land Register]. Ed. S. Hügel. München, 2014. 1532 s.

Melchers J. Das Recht auf Grundbucheinsicht [The right of access to the land register]. Der Deutsche Rechtspfl eger (Rpfleger) [The German registrars (Registrars)], 1993, no. 5.

Böhringer W. Informationelles Selbstbestimmungsrecht kontra Publizitätsprinzip bei § 12 Grundbuchordnung[Informational self-determination versus publicity principle in § 12 Land Register]. Der Deutsche Rechtspfl eger (Rpfleger) [The German registrars (Registrars)]. 1987, no. 3.

Böhringer W. Grundbucheinsicht — quo vadis? [Acquaintance with the land register — quo vadis?] Der Deutsche Rechtspfl eger (Rpfleger) [The German registrars (Registrars)]. 2001, no. 3, S. 210–253.

Nieder H. Entwicklungstendenzen und Probleme des Grundbuchverfahrens [Trends and problems of the land register procedure]. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift [New Legal Weekly Journal], 1984, no. 2.

Maaß E. Bauer H. J., Oefele H. F. Grundbuchordnung — Kommentar [Land Register — Comments]. München, 2013.

Demharter J. Grundbuchordnung, Kommentar [Land Register, Comments]. München, 2012, § 12, no. 7.

Schöner H., Stöber K. Grundbuchrecht, Handbuch der Rechtspraxis [Land registry law, Handbook of legal practice]. Vol. 4. München, 2008, no. 526a.

Göttlinger F. Notariat und Grundbuchamt im elektronischen Zeitalter [Notary and land registry office in the electronic age]. Zeitschrift für das Notariat in Deutschland [Journal of the Notary’s Office in Germany], 2002, no. 1.

Völzmann A. Die Zulässigkeit sog.‚ isolierter Grundbucheinsichten‘ durch Notare — Zugleich Anmerkungen zum Beschluss des Oberlandesgericht in Celle. Urteil vom 24.08.2010 [The so-called permissibility “separate viewing land records” for notaries — note to the regulation of the Higher Court in Celle. Judgment of 24.08.2010]. Zeitschrift für das Notariat in Deutschland [Journal of the Notary’s Office in Germany], 2011, no. 9/10, S. 156–177.

Heinemann J. Aufgabenübertragung auf Notare [Notary change tasks]. Praxis der Freiwilligen [Practice of voluntary jurisdiction], 2013, no. 1.

Preuß N. Das Gesetz zur Übertragung von Aufgaben im Bereich der freiwilligen Gerichtsbarkeit auf Notare [Th e Act of transferring tasks relating to the voluntary jurisdiction on notaries]. Zeitschrift für das Notariat in Deutschland [Journal of the Notary’s Offi ce in Germany], 2013, no. 5.

Eickmann D. Zur Konkretisierung des berechtigten als Voraussetzung eines Einsichtsrechtes in das Grundbuch [Specifi cation of legitimate interest to access the land register]. Zeitschrift für das Notariat in Deutschland [Journal of the Notary’s Offi ce in Germany], 1986, no. 2, S. 487–512.

Brehm W., Berger C. Sachenrecht [Proprietary Law]. Tübingen, 2006, § 10, no. 1.

Kollhosser H. Das Grundbuch — Funktion, Aufb au, Inhalt [Land register — functions, structure,content]. Juristischen Analyse [Legal Analysis], 1984, no. 10.

Weidemann M. Beck’scher Online Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch [Beck-Online Comment to Criminal Code]. Ed. B. Heintschel-Heinegg. München, 2013, § 271 Strafgesetzbuch [Criminal Code], no. 8.

Haritz D., Menner S. Umwandlungssteuergesetz, Kommentar [The law on the transformation of the taxation system. Commetnts]. München, 2009. § 27 Umwandlungssteuergesetz [The law on the transformation of the taxation system], no. 16.

Füller J. T. Eigenständiges Sachenrecht? [Independence Proprietary Law?]. Tübingen, 2006.

Stoecker O. The Eurohypothec. Jahresheft der Internationalen Juristenvereinigung Osnabrück [Yearbook of the International Association of lawyers in Osnabruc]. Osnabrück, 2007.

Wudarski A. In Search of the Structure of Eurohypothec. Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego [Quarterly Journal of Private Law], 2009, no. 1.

Ploeger H., van Loenen B., Nasarre Aznar S. EuroTitle: Land Registry Standard. International Journal of geoinformatics. 29.12.2005.

Ploeger H., van Loenen B. European Land Information Service — At the beginning of the road to harmonization of land registry in Europe. European review of private law, 2004, no. 3.

Remien O. Immobiliarsachenrecht in Europa — Skizze eines unvermessenen Gebiets [Properties in Europe — sketch not measured territory]. Festschrift Tuğrul Ansay [Jubilee collection for Tuğrul Ansay]. Alphen aan den Rijn, 2006.