Operational control in the system of state control (supervision): Implementation problems and ways to improve efficiency

Authors

  • Aleksei A. Batarin Federal Tax Service of Russia; Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8975-265X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.404

Abstract

The article analyses the regulatory and legal framework for operational control carried out by tax authorities to ensure compliance with the obligation to use cash registers, in the context of the introduction of this type of control into the sphere of state control legislation. Based on practical experience, the author identifies problems in law enforcement and states a decrease in the effectiveness of operational control within the context of a new legal framework characterized by an unmeasurable liberalization of legislation, including administrative offense legislation. The non-compliance with the principle of checks and balances within the design of legal norms has led to a decline in discipline, as confirmed by statistics from the Federal Tax Service of Russia. As a result, the tax authorities today lack the authority to respond promptly to violations (they cannot initiate an administrative offence case without a control event with a controlled person, even if they have evidence and mandatory prevention, and they cannot impose a warning for the first time, regardless of the damage). The reduced size of the sanctions raises questions about achieving the goal of administrative punishment. The author consistently points out logical inconsistencies in current legal regulations, as well as excessive bureaucratization of control procedures, which runs counter to the aims of the reform of control and supervision activities. He suggests ways to improve the effectiveness of operational controls, including specific amendments to Federal legislation. In addition, the article draws attention to the need to change the conceptual approach to operational control and incorporate it into the sphere of tax legislation regulation, which corresponds to its essential purpose — controlling the formation of a taxpayer’s tax basis through the use of cash registers. Hence, operational control is a state tool for ensuring tax security, and appropriate legal regulations should address such a goal.

Keywords:

cash register equipment, operational control, tax security, moratorium on inspections, administrative responsibility, control (supervisory) event, control purchase

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Батарин, А. А. 2022. «Особенности государственного регулирования применения контрольно-кассовых машин в Киргизской Республике». Финансовый журнал 14 (1): 108–125. https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2022-1-108-125

Батарин, А. А. 2023. «Налоговое законодательство государства и правила применения контрольно-кассовой техники: вопросы интеграции». Правоприменение 7 (1): 62–71. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(1).62-71

References

Batarin, A. A. 2022. “Features of state regulation of cash register use in the Kyrgyz Republic”. Finansovii zhurnal 14 (1): 108–125. https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2022-1-108-125 (In Russian)

Batarin, A. A. 2023. “The tax legislation of the state and the rules for the use of cash registers: Integration issues”. Pravoprimenenie 7 (1): 62–71. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(1).62-71 (In Russian)

Published

2024-12-28

How to Cite

Batarin , A. A. (2024). Operational control in the system of state control (supervision): Implementation problems and ways to improve efficiency. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 15(4), 974–992. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.404

Issue

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research